not all of the program has been mothballed. one third of the things that they have used -- i lose the word -- sit in place. john: centrifuges? alan: thank you so much. and they have not made any concessions on other issues, which you talked about. human rights and the attitude towards israel. towards all their neighbors, in fact. the expansionist nature of the regime. we have not gotten anything politically in return. also as you pointed out, the germans are eager for a deal. john: the german economic minister was there before the ink dried on paper. alan: it has not been signed yet. it has not been ratified by the congress, either. the reason is oil. john: ursula weidenfeld benjamin netanyahu told the israeli parliament the agreement does not make war more distant. it brings it closer. he is presumably thinking of the fact that in his view, israel feels abandoned and a military strike against iran is on the table. ursula: i do not think he is right. what we have is not a new agreement or friendship. it is only about preventing

. >> mothballs aren't working. >> something's wrong. >> that's going to do it for us. your way next. >> see you tomorrow. good night. ♪ >> steve: from studio 6b in rockefeller center in the heart of new york city, it's "the tonight show starring jimmy fallon." tonight, join jimmy and his guests -- adam sandler. judd

dreams of a luxury reinvun shun at the multi-billion rebel mothballed casting shadow of disappointmentwntown atlantic city but atlantic city's mayor remains optimistic. >> when people talk about the failure of atlantic city in the last few years the beautiful building sitting empty has to be sore for you to look at. >> absolutely and it represents at least 3,000 jobs that we don't have and some of the best restaurants and clubs and bars that we had so we are doing everything we can to try to get it open again. >> reporter: there is a silver lining to the casino closures. the ones that remain are rebounding with revenues up thanks to less competition. still the atlantic city area has an unemployment rate three times the national average. >> after talking with you over the last year your plan to me sounds like diversification. is gaming still going to be the backbone of this economy though? >> it's not the only choice. there is no single answer to make our city great. everything is going to be important. so great libation and cool bars and fun dining and bars is all part. >> reporter: in

centrifuges are being mothballed. if we don't take any action in the first year, we get the benefit and the detriment of the first year of the deal. the 10th the year is absolutely terrible. iran has free access to 10 times as many centrifuges. and so i think our focus needs to be thinking about preventing year 10. we can pass a resolution, it to be voted down overwhelmingly. in the future, congresses and presidents would be free to take action before year 10. that will be the strongest statement against the agreement. what is more likely to happen is a resolution of disapproval. it will pass vetoed, the veto is likely to be sustained. so, we reach the same position, or just congress declaring that it doesn't like the position. we do so in the most pitiful way, the final vote to being a victory for those that support the agreement. so, i think this deal is going to go into force. what i would like, what advice to you give president's next decade as about to prevent iran from having an industrial size enrichment progra

do if it's faithful to the interim agreement in april it's going to put it in a deep freeze or in mothball if you like but in ten years' time that super structure will still be in place. the iranians could begin theoretically to begin building it back up. and so you don't want them to have been able to experiment with advanced centrifuges. that would bring them closer to a nuclear capability. and there have to be very strict, i think, provisions that prevent iran from doing that. so obviously that's another issue that secretary kerry and the american administration are trying to prevent iranian advantages here. not surprising given all that we've talked about, andrea given the stakes involved that these talks are in extra innings. >> what about the upside the possibility that we can continue to restrain as has been restrained, everyone agrees for the past 18 1/2, 19 months of the interim agreement, that we can continue under this agreement to not only restrain any advancement of their nuclear program but actually dismantle it at various stages? isn't that a benefit, plus the side benefit t

they've stopped that and are going to mothball it and dismantle it. finally, they were not allowing the international community any inspections to determine what they are doing under this deal. they are agreeing to inspections for 10, 15, 25 years and, in some instances, under this i.a.e.a. additional protocall forever. so if you look at where we were before diplomacy and where we were after this deal, you will see there is a significant change that the administration has been able to achieve. and i'll tell you, charlie, even the critics kind of acknowledge this because the critics who were saying, two and a half years ago iran is within months of being a nuclear threshold state, now they are complaining about this deal because they say, under this deal iran might get a nuclear weapon in year 15. even their criticism acknowledges that the deal dramatically changes the status quo ante. that's why i think the president feels so strongly about the deal because his deal has achieved these ends and nobody else has advocated a plan that would have achieved

to look at the facts of the program, grants program will be suspended and frozen in effect and mothballed 14 years but when that 10 years is over, the superstructure of the program will be intact. iran would have a theoretical right to build back up plutonium or uranium route to nuclear weapons. that is a weakness of this agreement. that's the trade off. this was a real world negotiation where we receive some benefit, the freezing of the program for changes, but the program is not being entirely dismantled and we have to understand that. second i think it's important that the iaea past 25 years of insight into iran's program but would have a clear line of sight? will they have unfettered access? want in practice does managed access to nuclear plant mean? i think it means iran will write some of the rules about how its plans are inspected and survey questions have to be asked about that as well as about military dimensions. third, would we actually be able to reimpose sanction should iran cheat a fundamentally violate the agreement? none of us know. we are talking about a hypothetical situ

i believe iran's program will be frozen in mothballs for 10 years, but when that 10 years is over, the superstructure of the program will be intact. iran would have that their article right to build back up a plutonium or uranium route to a nuclear weapon. that is the weakness of this agreement. that is a trade-off. this was a real-world negotiation where we received some benefit, the freezing of the program for 10 years, but that program is not entirely dismantled and we have two understand that. second, i think it is important that the ie ae will have 25 years of insight into iran's program, but will they have a clear line of sight? will they have unfettered access? what, in practice, does managed access to a nuclear plant mean? i think it means iran will write some of the rules about how its plants aren't spec did. certainly we have to ask that about military dimensions. third, would we really be able to to play sanctions should iran she or violate sanctions? -- should iran she or violate sanctions? it will affect whoever we elect in 2016. i think the europeans will be with us. i th

iran must ship 90% of its uranium stockpiles out of the country and mothball 2/3 of the centrifuges. as we craft our policy, we should be loathed to give up those two advantages. we must whenever we focus on anything, say yes there are bad parts of this deal, but 2/3 of the centrifuges, 90% of the stockpiles, that's something we need to be focused on. so that's the good. the bad also occurs in the first year. iran will get its hands on 120 billion-plus dollars of their own money that we have under the sanctions have been able to freeze in various money centers around the world. what will they use this $120 billion for? part of it will go to help their own people because they have raised expectations. a good part will go to graft and corruption in the iranian regime because it is after all the iranian regime. a large portion of that will go to kill sunni muslims. some of them deserve it, most do not. and what is left over will be used to kill americans and israelis. so there is bad in the first year and good in the first year. but what is truly ugly occurs after 10 years. yet after ye

political dimensions to this but this is a highly technical agreement that deals with centrifuge, mothballingquires a technical competency that someone like moniz, who is the secretary of energy and a cabinet official he comes wired with an enormous amount of technical capability and frankly, passed agreements that we have with the iranians to get us to this point. we're very dependent on his creativity, so it's a fascinating team we've got. >> speaking of mvps from the atlantic steven clemens, good to see you. >> my pleasure. good to talk to you. >>> up ahead, the string of shark attacks on the atlantic coast is making swimmers think twice about going in the water. but can scientists really explain what's happening? we'll take a look. we leave out corn,wheat and soy. and we own where our dry food is made-100 percent! can other brands say all that? for nutrition you can trust and your pet will enjoy... does your food go beyond? learn more at purinabeyond.com. you owned your car for four years. you named it brad. you loved brad. and then you totaled him. you two had been through everything tog