agent motyka raised to other issues. one was make an emergency disclosures mandatory and in the discretion of law-enforcement insiders in the discussion for providers. i think he would have constitutional implications and i'm not sure that congress could even do it. i do think that if there is a problem with the emergency disclosures and whether they are being made in proper emergency is, that congress ought to look at it. there are two b. study and a reporter. i suspect that are there are some instances where the disclosure should be made and probably instances where they should not have been that they were. i am not saying that there are abuses. i'm not saying there misuses. i am saying if we change the rules on emergency disclosures, you ought to be able to point to things that we're trying to fixb and get a better idea of what they are. finally, on how quickly providers respond to law enforcement requests, i think additional study needs to be done about as well. one amendment that was noticed but never offered the se

it is a very narrow defined circumstance. >> konrad motyka is a special agent. he is currently assigned to the foreign counterintelligence division. gregory nojeim is with the center of technology. he spent many years as the associate director legislative counsel of the washington office. next area of discussion? >> is there any risk of impeding litigation? the securitiesf and exchange commission, and they want to get information from you. they want to know something about whether the company is engaging in illegal business practices. does this impede the investigation? >> you could use google as an example. google acts both as a provider of communications and is a provider of communication to its employees. what i think the world ought to look like is that if they are investigating google and they want to get the corporate records, it they should be able to serve a subpoena and get the records. that is what the legislation is intended to do. if they are doing an investigation of somebody else to has age e-mail account and your e-mail is not a global corporate r