the mou is an interdepartmental mou between rpd, the real estate division and dpw and outlining each agency's responsibility in the creation and management of the dog and skate park as well as adjacent parking lot that will be on the site but adjacent to the park and managed by the real estate division. rpd's responsibilities under the mou are essentially to maintain and operate the skate and dog parks for the 20 year lease term. there is an identified funding source for the majority of those costs. we estimate maintenance cost at $85,000 a year. we identified 66,000-dollar a year in funding so there is a little gab there, but our department feels given the importance of both of these amenities in our park system we feel comfortable in recommending that we move forward despite small spending -- small expenditure short fall. dpw has been responsible for designing and will be responsible for building the park. design drawings are almost complete. you should have in your packet a copy of those drawings. hopefully to have it completed by the end of the year and real estate will be respon

shouldn't that happen as part of this mou? >> for give me commissioner i don't follow. >> yeah, we're saying we're going to incur these additional costs. yearly basis; right? >> yeah. >> shouldn't that be for future generations part of this mou, so that from year to year this liability or this responsibility is assumed by the department by future administrations? >> well, i think that while the exact amount of the fund suggest not outlined in the document the responsibilities that total to that $85,000 in annual costs are outlined in the document. >> right, but it doesn't -- it says that -- it mentions the $66,000 but that's the extent of it. it doesn't mention -- >> that's the 66,000-dollar that dpw required and up front. >> right. but i don't see -- >> the responsibilities -- >> [inaudible] >> the responsibilities that we're required or we are committing to in the mou they're outlined there. we didn't do a cost estimate. >> [inaudible] >> we can include that cost estimate as an attachment but to be honest 20 years out i don'

>> you're on the right track, but this is an mou so this is not going to the board and we can't have future boards appropriate funds in a certain way so this is something we could have them move it in the budget and have the board approve it before we take over maintaining and operating the facility and we would have the certainty that this funding source was in play the next 20 years. >> with that we're through public comment. i don't see anymore commissioner questions. can i explain a motion? >> moved. >> and seconded. >> moved and seconded. all those in favor? so moved. >> now we are item 10 which is general public comment continued so joshua, jeff and richard. >> thanks for waiting. >> no problem mr. chair. sorry for being premature in the agenda. i am executive director of bright line defense project. we're a nonprofit community advocacy organization worked on policies to promote sustainable communities and one of the things that we do is target job opportunities through programs like the city's hiring program which park and rec is a successful partner in and promote wages and c

why can't mou be a role model for kids? we have elmo. >> and i do like mr.pibb by the way. i actually disagree with the coat. i think he was wrong. he says -- no, we should be in satiable in our learning. he is saying accept mediocrity. no, we should be learning insatiably. that being said we owe the chinese so we have to say whatever they want. >> that was like a charlie rose thing you said right there. >> take a break. we will arm wrestle later. patti ann browne does really good. >> you outraged o are are quite handsome. >> greg: she is as pretty as bill is repulsive. >> that is almost like a compliment. >> you don't have to help him.

we are in the cali complex, we have an mou with the secretary of cali and can bring resources from other companies in the field across all the disciplines for mutual assistance. we can stage, deploy and sit on situational awareness providing the state the information they need to posture a response and at the same time we can then be putting together the teams that are going to have to come in and support pg&e or other utilities that are in the stricken zone. we'll be calling on organizations from san diego to redding, we'll be calling on organizations outside the state of california that we have mou's with out of nevada and other surrounding states so that in the event an incident of this magnitude happens there is sufficient response personnel notified postured and deployed to keep a continuous line of assistance from the private municipal sector moving into the stricken area in san francisco to support and reconstitute those life lines across all disciplines, telecommunication, water, waste water, gas and energy. >> thank you. mr. brig. >> good afternoon. when we talk about resill yep

on the high speed rail front, san francisco is committed to 60 million as our member's share for the mou, contribution to the early investment projects for high speed rail. 7, we have some funding 7 million approximately, that needs to be identified this spring. at to fulfill our contribution to the early investments positive train, control project. and so we will continue to work with the mayor's office and these funds and also the funding for the project in general and bringing it to the terminal which is north of the terminal in the state. on the federal appropriation side, central subway has received the funding grant agreement but they are still subject to annual appropriations by congress and so we will be working to insure that an appropriate level of funding is appropriate d every year and advocating for small starts including vanes and brt. >> new, federal transportation funding. the federal gasoline tax at 18.4 cents has not been increased since 1993 and has lost a significant amount of its value over the last 20 years, the highway trust fund can no longer support the programs

. >> yes, general, in the mou it does address the ground portion but the focus of effort is mainly on the aviation side but it is built in there for the ground side if necessary. >> i just want to say in 2008 we did activate hand crews to fight fires and we've identified soldiers throughout the state to respond if needed. they've got the tools that they need, the boots and all that cached and available. it's really just a matter of getting the call and being ready to go. >> i was going to end with general myat. i know we've trained soldiers to do that kind of thing. after the colorado fires just recently they did put a lot of soldiers that trained, so we do still have that program who can do that if the need warrants. any other questions from out there before i turn it over to general myat? let me thank our panel here. >> thank you. (applause). as we leave here today, we need to keep the ball moving forward. we can't -- i think most of us all here would agree, we really can't prevent the next disaster from happening. but by building the partnerships that we are here today and will con

why can't mou be a role model for kids? we have elmo. >> and i do like mr.pibb by the way. i actually disagree with the coat. i think he was wrong. he says -- no, we should be in satiable in our learning. he is saying accept mediocrity. no, we should be learning insatiably. that being said we owe the chinese so we have to say whatever they want. >> that was like a charlie rose thing you said right there. >> take a break. we will arm wrestle later. patti ann browne does really good. >> you outraged o are are quite handsome. >> greg: she is as pretty as bill is repulsive. >> that is almost like a compliment. >> you don't have to help him. >> greg: is this a sim is many error by a clueless intern working some kind of program or is it what i think it is, a sinister plot to transform the united states into a communist state? >> tough to say. he did convert china to a single party socialist state and now a u.s. agency under the obama administration puts this up and somebody who we are supposed to admire and look up to our students. >> scary. >> it as conspiracy. >> greg: a conspi

just had a question i know in the resolution it mentioned that this is a carry over from the previous mou in terms of the amount but in our notes page 17 it says that the amount carried over is -- they are requesting 120 thousand and i just wanted some clarity. >> the 120 thousand is the amount not to exceed i think it covers past work that's already been initiated most of the remaining work the total budget is consistent at 120 thousand. 78 thousand is carried over from the previous -- the new will be completed by 2013 and that's the subject of the update. >> so the 78 thousand -- so an additional -- so that's included in the 120 thousand? >> correct. >> okay thank you. >> okay if no other comments, can we have a role call vote. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> aye. >> the item passes. >> okay item passes our next item please. >> state and federal legislative program. >> any comments or questions? let's go on to public comment. any member of the public like to comment on this item? close public comment. this resolution is adopted. next item please. >> adopt a position o

, the plan assumes inflationary increases equivalent to inflation, the consumer price index on open mou agreements beginning in fiscal 15-16. the plan also incorporates savings that have been generated through the passage of proposition fee or pension reform measure and the plan identifies a number of department specified issues that i'm happy to talk to you more about and there's certainly more detail in the report itself. so, at the highest level, the plan identifies a gap between revenues and expenditures over the five year period of 487 million dollars, as you can see in the chart that's on the screen, over the five years, our city revenues are projected to grow by 13%, but our expenditures are expected to grow by 25% over that same period of time. and that difference creates our projected deficit shortfall that we're going to talk about how to close. on the revenue side, i would highlight, these are strong revenue projections and so over the next five years, 578, nearly 600 million dollars of revenue growth to the city. the growth is supported by, you know, the overall economic con

mou do i support this? and i can't. it's insane and adam this is the antithesis of libertarianm.y i was in brooklyn last night and showing up at the door. >> charlie turn down the insurance, don't take it. >> and on the crew that i saw last night, and-- >> i'm not a lawyer, but i've watched perry mason. and i will say this, charles payne, that let's say they could look into that and did see where we're going after work and shouldn't have had the double order of wings and all. is that a fireable offense? the next obvious concern that you either stop going out to that wing place or we're going to fire you. i mean, that's the beyond the-- >> and the policy and they go through the trouble, it will be fireable offense for them. i've got to tell you, i run a business and scares me, the most when they have a big breakfast or a big lunch. i don't want to control their lunch, but they're done for the day. i've seen guys with a steak and mashed potato and think, my man and-- >> what do you think they come back-- no, you get sluggish after that, not productive after that. these guys eat the

corner of 5th and brannan, which is 601 brannan, assessor's block 3785, lot 132 be reclassified so the mou district . the purpose of the change would be to allow that site, which houses the architecture department of aau to be considered as conditional use, which is the way it could be under the current zoning. the conditional use was filed in 2012 and actually the planning department started working with a or a you in the legalization of that property. it could be consistent with eastside of 5th street, which is in that western muo district and south of the property between brooks and townsend. the two on townsend street are permitted to conditional uses. the one on 5th street and brannan would not be. alternatively i would suggest a grandfather clause, which was turned down by the commission. thank you. >> thank you, mr. passmore. >> good afternoon, supervisors, tim collin on behalf of the san francisco housing action coalition and i should state without ambiguity, this plan should be moved forward. it should be adopted. there has been a lot of work done ton it and one of san francisco's

item number 5, discussion of mou between dbi and the san francisco housing authority and the housing tenant complaint report process. >> thank you. i guess i was the one that asked that this be put on the agenda because, as we've all read about, there's been a lot of reports of problems at some of the housing projects in san francisco and there is an m-o-u between the hud and the dbi in term of the inspections that we're supposed to do if there's any violations and stuff or repairs or any tenant complaints. so, i wanted to get an update on how we've been dealing with novs, how many novs we've gotten and whether some of those problems have been abated. >> thank you, members of the commission. good morning, rosemary boss key, chief housing expecter. you have before you the ongoing tracking table that we created upon the execution and adoption of the m-o-u between the housing authority, the san francisco housing authority and the department of building inspection. it deals exclusively with complaints that are received by the department of building inspection. this m-o-u does not address

and between the two of them, they helped work out the mou, that was an important piece for the work we need to do. and they are helping us out on who can be on the yards and what cannot be. so we are putting in the safety measures. and i want to give a shout out to michael and christine. these are volunteers, residents in the community. that loved this idea and stepped up to say, what can we can do to help. chris and i didn't have the capacity to make this a stronger program. and i feel such confidence in michael and christine to make this a strong, viable program. i think that the principals will be appreciative that there are funds for them to do something on the weekend. and to bring people on their school site. and i want to give a heart-felt thank you to supervisor farrell. without your help and support and willingness to raise the funds and to see a vision for community and schools to be closer aligned. and just the vision to open those up. i feel badly, roosevelt is not on our list. and this is the school across the street from supervisor farrell that inspired him to want to do

. >> i talked a little bit about mou's and relationships with the marines. maybe we can talk about how is the national guard and dod resources and capabilities integrated into the command and control at the fire and also the supporting ops centers whether it be the gac or other centers down there. maybe our military personnel can talk about that, or ray. >> it's important to note that we are the supporting effort to cal fire and we get called in when they are basically out of assets. we are working for cal fire, they are the incident commanders, we follow their coordination, typically we're the last ones in and the first ones out. we do have an on-going relationship with cal fire, i'm in contact with cal fire all the time. we have good situational awareness what's going on in the state of california. they normally put us in an alert stat us so we're prepared to respond in an attack mode. i don't often work with chief chaney in southern california, about a month ago we had 9 aircraft at our peak working fires throughout northern california if that answers you