in the mou, it states that in fact it always has and i wanted to show you that in the previous mou, it stated that there will be monthly reports to you with the data, so, in the new mou, we have amended that to be three times a year. so this is that time, this is the summary one at the end of the year i included march, and november, and march and at the end of the year. i do want to mention one thing about the data that you are going to see tonight. it does say in the mou and it we will be amending this, it says that it is going to be disarrogated by the school site and that is actually not the case and i was actually requested by the board not to call it out by school sites. and so, we will be making that amendment. and lastly, an important part of the mlu is also related to the grievances. and the current mou, states that the sfusd restorative practices task force which will be convened will have at least two youth members and i don't know if i read it for you, and this is an area that i want to be up front that we did and we have not had an opportunity and actually of the people ser

now that we have one we would like to move our focus from getting an mou to implementation of that mou. with that, our recommendations are to identify time lines to expedite full implementation of the school sites. continued collaboration relationships with sfusd and stakeholders to include process to implementation, to commence training and collaboration with sf you'd. if there were trainings for actual documents we would like to see inclusion of language from do 71. i would like to thank the chief who is here today and everyone who worked with us on this priority and students who collaborated with us. we see this mou to improve community relationships within the city and establish relationships between the schools, departments and the community. i will be presenting no. 9. the police department has made huge strides in improving youth relations. they passed didgo 7.01 for interrogation. last year announced the police officers would be involved with the boys and girls club of america. that being said we recommend an implementation for training for all police officers for the stress on

i think this is largely a policy matter for the board but i'll come with the information about the mou dead and . >> within the assigned of my voice i'll request when you do could be with a conceptual commentary on this matter we'll request the representative of the d hr department of human resources be present so we might be able to further inquire their understanding of what is expected in this regard i request that under the director that has direct contact. >> and commissioners francisco'sier the d h.r. descendent on this item they're not setting united states us up they were cognizant of the increased work and it was special and if we have had to do this with all 60 i'm not sorry you need a whole different department. >> the ash traitor bieptd us and this was imposed by the ash traitor. >> it was imposed. >> yeah. through the binding process. i'm asking we get a complete assessment of the process as well as the mremsdz and have a moment during one of those meetings to have discussion around the item. >> that concludes my report. . thank you >> thank you. one question i had dr. dod

. >> so one of the things that is definitely in the mou. and one of the things that it does say in the mou is do not call and if it does specify things that you should not call the police for, you are not supposed to call the police to be the disciplinary for the school. that regular staff should not be calling the police that they need to inform an administrator who would be the one to contact the police, security guards do not contact, unless it is a 911 which anyone can do, the principal, however, is the one who would be and make that determination, and that is what is in the mou. as far as interrogations or any contact in being questioned by the police, the parents must be notified and given a reasonable time to appear at the school and we assessed the reasonable time to be three or three hours, at least given the parents and how soon can you be here and allow them that time to be there. to be present when their child is questioned, so those things are happening. yes, okay. >> so i have two other issues. one is that we have always been

>> are you suggesting an mou between at&t? >> no, were you involved during those cushions that -- discussions that occurred when the mou came out? >> no between the city and at&t, i was not. >> the criteria that is listed on the discussion are extremely difficult to define. you know, it's hard to say anybody if they had a certain opinion about those things is incorrect. you know, without anymore flesh to it, you know? >> what the department tries to do is to get community input to identify the least objectionable. >> i was curious as to whether there were discussions at the conclusion of this mou related to some more tive eye thank you. >> any public comment on this item. this is by the association, i would ask that officers speak on the time allotted to the parties and not on public comment. >> commissioners, thank you for your time tonight. my name is thomas gulf mcgiven. i live at 21 quintara at the proposed location by at&t. when i moved to this street quintara, the street was a dumping ground for unwanted debris. garbage.

>> it was 96'. >> okay. >> i will make a motion to approve the mou. >> thank you. mr. pacheco? city clerk: we have a motion from commissioner honda to adopt the memorandum of understanding for the port commission. on that motion, commissioner fung, huang, hurt doeshgs lapis -- lazarus. this item is adopted. >> thank you for coming today. >> then item 5 is our next item up which is two jurisdictions request. item 5: subject property at 56 presidio avenue. letter from brian soriano, attorney for steven minisini, requestor, asking that the board take jurisdiction over electrical permit e2014/02/26/7657 and bpa no. 2014/03/13/0693, which was issued on february 26, 2014 and march 13, 2014, respectively. the appeal periods ended on march 13, 2014 and march 28, 2014 respectively, and both jurisdiction requests were filed at the board office on may 06, 2014. permit holder: steven greenwald & rochelle alpert. project #1: 27 roof mounted solar pv modules, 250 watts per module; 1 interactive inverter, 250w power rating, ttl no. of rating 6.75kw905039, meter main electrical service will al

to the cal tran contribution, we as the city, i believe also the transportation authority signed an mou committing to $60 million worth of funding. this is a possible source for that funding. it doesn't preclude us exploring other sources but i think we do want to send a strong signal to our regional partners that we'll absolutely honor the terms of that mou, that we signed onto. in terms of committing to fill the gap, what i can commit is to work with the board and i appreciate your offer to work with us on that, and with the mayor's office to close that gap, again, both in fiscal 16 and in fiscal 17 because it's two years of impact from the two year delay of the vehicle license fee, but we're committed and my board was the first to dopt vision zero and we want to make sure we're doing what we can to raise the revenues so we can implement it as fully as possible. speaker: i look forward to the conversations. thank you. >> supervisor wiener. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i want to follow up on a few comments and questions from supervisor mar. in terms of cal trans and cal trans success in

with the union. >> and the mou, currently provides, 10 to 12 hour shifts for level ones and twos and so we will have to meet and confer with the local 798 bargaining unit. >> and so i would like us to move on that sooner rather than later and my office is happy to introduce the legislation, but, i would like us to be in compliance with this issue so that it is off the table. >> no problem. >> reallocation number 1.4, of over time hours to ems to insure that all schedule ambulances can be sent out and serviced to respond to medical calls, can you explain that a bit in terms of the fact that you completely disagree, with that recommendation? >> yes, and so, i am going to have mark come up and describe that, he can do it much more succintly than i could. >> thank you. >> to address the issue of over time in the ems division, our department uses absolutely is in support of using over time for the ems division, the issue we are currently having is due to the scheduling and the dynamic schedules that we have for the paramedics and the emts and it is not as easy to allocate the shifts and w

take the illicit premium they get one hundred percent credit that's zero the question is how is the mou language reader for the e plus one it didn't distinguish between the employee only and then the didn't want indemnifies of costs it takes the combined e plus premium and multiples by a certain percent then you pay x x percentage points that's how it is written so the good news is - >> let me say you've basically rated this with with the mou for the union; right? >> right so the clarification the real good thing all the people employees only pay zero before the 93, 83 they pay in the case of united health care or the cities health care plan 93 percent so those people in the subsequent table those people get full credit for the premium that's a good thing. so it's well negotiated situation so i hope that answers our question and comments? dr. >> i believe the language is in the handout but it actually is employee accomplice one and dependents who want to enroll sea the city shall contribute 93 percent the total health care insurance provided the city's contributions s are capitalized in

and we'll be sharing more about that with you as that mou is developed. and also the dph budget office is working with the sheriff's cfo on staffing. you're going to hear more about that from the sheriff at the conclusion of this presentation. the fourth and final key finding area was in facility improvements. the finding was that the designated security communications office, or soc it's also referred to was inadequate in terms of space and functionality of the technology. invested security equipment and hardware did not meet the needs of the unique clientele served by sfgh. recommendations and corrective actions include the establishment of an appropriate hospital security operating center that's equipped to handle 24/7 requests for skusht and safety services. in terms of activities to date, a larger space has been identified to house the security on the first floor of the hospital and we're working with our facility folks now to begin to transition that from the current space into the new space. the other part of the finding was that the technology was

>> as has been said, the restrictions of the mou are for a one-year period. that includes the restriction on their travel outside of qatar. so after one year -- >> so after one year, no restrictions. >> except under circumstances that we would discuss in the closed -- >> gentleman's time is expired. >> thank you, mr. chairman. >> thank you, mr. chairman. thank you very much, mr. secretary and mr. preston. i appreciate very much your service. mr. secretary, you said in your testimony that this was a -- well, first of all, let me just say that i think a lot of people have had very emotional reactions to this and what they've seen about this with incomplete information, and i certainly think that's understandable, but these are difficult circumstances to judge, and we as elected officials and you as appointed officials have to put aside our emotions and political expediency in order to best use our professional judgment, and obviously what will be said in secret session also pertains to this. but what i'm concerned about now is the law and the notification of co

and as part of the mou that we had entered into, there was a side letter, and with a commitment to add nursing staffing, and in specific areas, and it was part of that agreement, and so our concern was that we did not want to have an offseting reduction to salary, we had agreed with the budget and legislative analyst, to remove that recommendation, so that is not part of these reductions, and with the technical adjustment from the mayor's office, that mou side letters going forward fully anticipated. >> thank you. >> and in our haurg hearing it was discussed that the department is doing a lot of work to expedite the hiring process to the department dhr and how is that moving along and how are we seeing that stream lining going forward? >> we are very focused on it from top to bottom and we actually just left the executive team meeting where we focused on that, so we have got, a new several, new hr team members, that are hired, as of about three weeks ago. and so, we have reorganized ourselves and added staffing in the exam unit that will help to facilitate to move that process along an

present 31 individual pieces of legislation, 31 contracts, amendments and or ordinates, we have 34 mous in the city and we renegotiated and amended every single one except for two related to the police and two related to our city's doctor and dentist and so we think that we have a new record. >> what you see this, and embodied in these agreements, are a three-year contract. which, in which all of those 31 contracts are proud in, in time. and we believe that these are fair and sustain able contracts fair to the employees and the city. the three-year deal preserves general equity between bargaining units, and the wage package and the economic items in the contracts line up very well with each other. there are a couple of anomalies due mostly to the items that went into the arbitration, but by and large the labor feels that the process was fair and that the results are fair. the single biggest issue in these negotiations was of course, wages. as you know, prior to the raises given in this current fiscal year, employees went five years without a raise, coming out of the financial crisis of

>> as has been said, the restrictions of the mou are for a one-year period. that includes the restriction on their travel outside of qatar. so after one year -- >> so after one year, no restrictions. >> except under circumstances that we would discuss in the closed -- >> gentleman's time is expired. >> thank you, mr. chairman. >> thank you, mr. chairman. thank you very much, mr. secretary and mr. preston. i appreciate very much your service. mr. secretary, you said in your testimony that this was a -- well, first of all, let me just say that i think a lot of people have had very emotional reactions to this and what they've seen about this with incomplete information, and i certainly think that's understandable, but these are difficult circumstances to judge, and we as elected officials and you as appointed officials have to put aside our emotions and political expediency in order to best use our professional judgment, and obviously what will be said in secret session also pertains to this. but what i'm concerned about now is the law and the notification of co

. >> these things are all done without an mou in place. and what we have found on a number of occasions is that our local law enforcement agencies aren't beholden to the dod or any other directives to enter into any agreement. if i approach them with something they're going to have to sign they'll run it through their legal counsel and either refuse to sign or handshake and work with us. we haven't had a problem working with people. it's never a bad idea to try to come up with something that forces agencies that have difficulty working together, but i'm not sure an mou is the right thing for that. >> we do have -- excuse me. go ahead. >> go ahead. >> we have a franklin county sexual assault response protocol that's been developed among all law enforcement agencies in our -- led by our county prosecutor that that serves as that road map or guide as well. a guiding document. and that's reviewed and analy analyzed. >> the university is part of that? >> absolutely. >> i just wanted to underline what mike was saying about coordination being a b

that comes back to the importance of mou. i was on a first name basis are detected and can cause or my cell phone. having the reassurance when a student does come, i can sit and call this person noted personally come and give them the positive aspects after just despite how important is to have an advocate through the process because yes it may be hard, but i will help along the way. if you did if you need help with your academic stuff, let me talk to your teen. been there with a student, but helping them throughout that is so important. >> one of the rights inc. was to not take it. confidentiality and advocate. by the way, senator mccaskill and i joined in expanding the right to an advocate within the military system. so i thought from what i heard in a roundtable is that the idea of an advocate who would provide advice. it matches that the advocates speak to the world in advocacy, but also can advise on these options with confidentiality because that is what an advocate, a lawyer does for a client. rather than the universit

they mou does not derive whether or not we work with people. it's never a bad idea to try to come up with something forces agencies that have difficulty working together but i'm not sure an mou is the right thing for that. >> excuse me. go ahead. we do a franklin county sexual assault response protocol developed among all law enforcement agencies led by our county prosecutor that serves as their roadmap or guide or guiding document and that is reviewed and analyzed. >> university is part of that? >> absolutely. >> i wanted to underline what mike was saying about ordination being a bigger issue than just law enforcement and the university. it's an internal university issue and there is also other key relationships outside of the university and that is with whoever the community sexual violence advocates are, anti-sexual advocates are. sexual assault response team has been a key best practice that has been -- that has been shown to work over and over again because you can pull in both the people internally that need to be coordinated and the peop

he signed the mou. i'll ask him to handle that question in particular because he negotiated and signed it. thank you. >> i think the question is best answered in the closed session, if you would indulge us in that respect. >> okay. let me close by asking this then. what happens to these detainees after a year? >> as has been said, the restrictions of the mou are for a one year period. that includes the restriction on their travel outside of qatar. so after one year -- >> after one year no restrictions. >> except under circumstances that we would discuss in the closed session. >> gentleman's time is expired. >> thank you, mr. chairman. >>> thank you very much, mr. secretary and mr. preston. i appreciate very much your service. mr. secretary, you said in your testimony that this was a -- first of all let me say i think a lot of people have had very emotional reactions to this and what they've seen about this with incomplete information. and i certainly think that's understandable, but these are difficult

>> as has been said, the restrictions of the mou are for a one-year period. that includes the restriction on their travel outside of qatar. so after one year -- >> so after one year, no restrictions. >> except under circumstances that we would discuss in the closed -- >> gentleman's time is expired. >> thank you, mr. chairman. >> thank you, mr. chairman. thank you very much, mr. secretary and mr. preston. i appreciate very much your service. mr. secretary, you said in your testimony that this was a -- well, first of all, let me just say that i think a lot of people have had very emotional reactions to this and what they've seen about this with incomplete information, and i certainly think that's understandable, but these are difficult circumstances to judge, and we as elected officials and you as appointed officials have to put aside our emotions and political expediency in order to best use our professional judgment, and obviously what will be said in secret session also pertains to this. but what i'm concerned about now is the law and the notification of co

this permit is part of the at&t light speed project that has other layers of protocol due to the mou and thing is there any, no, sir, requirements in there >> the initial visitation as it relates to at&t's agreement with the city and the mounted facilities is the original posting necessity indication we'll hold a hearing to gather input from the public to determine whether the site is appropriate for place of employment once that's determined a decision is render and if the decision is affirmative attica apply for an constellation facility pilot it's that on the approval that triggers the appeal period. >> right but the only notification is for the site permit. >> that's correct. >> thank you. any public comment on that item? please step forward >> hello. thank you for letting me speak i'm one of the several people that oppose this site. i was in e-mails and communication with dpw regarding that and they sent me an e-mail saying you'll be modified when the permit was i didn't know anything was happening until i got a notification that construction was beginning i started to came back