where mr alito works issued a report which presented the problem to congress president bush tried to change the system so that a portion of the food would be procured from local markets and arrive faster and cost less. they failed and they failed because of the lobbying efforts the highly successful and very sophisticated lobbying efforts of those who benefit from the status quo and use food aid programs from the american taxpayers' money only forty percent goes for the purchase of food aid for the starving people in africa the remaining sixty percent goes to the shipping companies. that i mean yes. yes it was a good idea yes i'm. good i am a god who are very happy that i was. like you i don't like depending on others with the work. all that much and all of them on the but our land doesn't produce anything and deprives us of some. of what we did a month ago with so some wheat but it was aired in the sun on holland i met them yes i missed in the world. but they have met al and we appreciate that other countries take care of us that are going to go the government of kenya. knows that t

where mr alito works issued a report which presented the problem to congress. president bush tried to change the system so that a portion of the food would be procured from local markets and thus a wry faster and cost less. they failed and they failed because of the lobbying efforts the highly successful and very sophisticated lobbying efforts of those who benefit from the status quo in u.s. food aid programs from the american taxpayers' money only forty percent goes for the purchase of food aid for the starving people in africa the remaining sixty percent goes to the shipping companies. that haven't yet yet the reader have made yet.

where mr alito works issued a report which presented the problem to congress. president bush tried to change the system so that a portion of the food would be procured from local markets and thus a wry faster and cost less. they failed and they failed because of the lobbying efforts the highly successful and very sophisticated lobbying efforts of those who benefit from the status quo in u.s. food aid programs from the american taxpayer's money only forty percent goes for the purchase of food aid for the starving people in africa the remaining sixty percent goes to the shipping companies. that haven't yet. yet the reader have a good however. was that i am the god who gave you haven't heard. that. i don't like depending on as heirs with the right. of that much and all of them other than i but our land doesn't produce anything and to prise us a soda. out of what did and months ago was so to some wheat but it was aired in the sun on. a mist and. now. we.

where mr alito works issued a report.

where mr alito works issued a report which presented the problem to congress president bush tried to change the system so that a portion of the food would be procured from local markets and arrive faster and cost less.

mr. chairman justice alito said new technology may provide increased security at the expense of privacy and many people might find the tradeoff worthwhile. how do we know if people find the tradeoff worthwhile and who gets to make that decision? >> can i comment on that? >> sure. >> that's a catchy statement. the problem if -- >> it's not my statement. >> i know it's not yours. i understand that. my concern with that statement is that because society would -- or members of society would be willing to make that tradeoff, the individual will be the one who suffers the harm, and i think again that's the job of -- i assume that's one of the reasons why this committee is holding these hearings, is to get our view. i agree with congressman richmond that this body should make a determination of that because if it's just a matter of, well, what society would prefer or what tradeoffs society would be willing to make, individuals are going to be the ones who suffer. >> so, if i remember law correctly, the bill of rights sets the minimum and if states or this entity perhaps wanted to have a more arduo

mr. chairman. gentlemen, i think justice alito said this: new technology may provide increased convenience or securityxpense of privacy, and many people may find the trade worthwhile. how we will know that who who who gets to make that decision? >> can i comment on that, congressman? >> sure. >> that's a touchy statement. the problem with -- >> it's not my statement. >> i understand that. my concern with that statement is that because society would -- or members of society would be willing to make that tradeoff, the individual will be the one who suffers the harm. and i think, again, that's the job of -- i assume that's one of the reasons why this committee is holding the hearing to get our view. i agree with congressman richmond this body should make a determination of that. if it's just a matter of what society would prefer or what tradeoff society would be willing to make, individuals are the ones who suffer. >> so, if i remember con law correctly, the bill of rights kind of sets the minimum, and if states or this entity, perhaps, wanted to have a more arduous view of of one of the amendments, we c