couple of position mr blair will try we are aware of the problem with truly are of course the other courts with the same repeat they shouldn't be said to favor the disembarkation and clearing through customs of illegal fishing projects in there has been complaints and we're trying to work together with the corresponding countries but with minister however as far as the european union countries are concerned we are responsible and all they can say is that we intend to use force controls and we really must look into these issues. her. at the center was from soon ago or soon as the fish is caught in a bit on the one hand it is caught immediately and on the other it gets here within twelve hours packed in styrofoam with a proper airy set nine to twelve degrees celsius and it gets here right away within twelve hours. who yes of course they buy it it's also cheaper there's not a lot of difference from domestic fish. it's not just the michael should sink if you do that when they eat fish that comes from each illegal fishing they eat the life of a fisherman. if they can see him as think of that an

but to make up for the point on what mr. blair just said there, when the initial set of problems were first exposed by the ap last spring, the air force's initial response was, well, part of the problem is these fellows, these officer was do this job are very young and they have not taken it seriously enough. >> and they have a moral problem. >> and that's norbted with this morale problem. on the other hand, that is some what putting the blame on these young officers. other people will tell you that the real problem is weak leadership by the more senior people in the air force. >> ifill: is that something you found in your investigation with secretary, then senator hagel as well, mr. blair? >> well, we didn't look into this dimention very thoroughly. but i stay very close to the ground on these questions, in close contact with former and current launch control officers and my view is that these men and women are every bit as capable and proficient, competent and dedicated as previous generations of launch officers, including my ow

mr. tony blair. mr. sharon's body will be buried at his ranch in southern israel. here in washington, d.c., tomorrow, from the brookings institution, a conversation with kiersten jell-o brand about social mobility, the ability of people to move from lower class status to upper class. that will be at 9:00 a.m. eastern time. atorrow afternoon, paul ryan the brookings institution also talking about social mobility. he is the budget committee chair. we will have him live on c-span 3 at 4:00 eastern. i see itrial case, as come is one of the bigger court cases that could potentially affect the communication sector, and the biggest thing that will change our space is the aerial case. potentially the supreme court take this up and find out one way or the other whether aerial services legal under copyright law. >> with the sec does this year will be determined by a brand- new and very dynamic chairman in tom wheeler who used to head the wireless association ctia and cable association and is not afraid to come out swinging england >> the biggest decision right now on the hil

mr. tony blair. mr. sharon's body will be buried at his ranch in southern israel. here in washington, d.c., tomorrow, from the brookings institution, a conversation with kiersten jell-o brand about social mobility, the ability of people to move from lower class status to upper class. that will be at 9:00 a.m. eastern time. tomorrow

mrs. thatcher or tony blair would say they just left defense and foreign policy decisions to their secretary of state. and only occasionally intervened. i think the history -- history as a bilateralds thing between a prime minister and a foreign secretary or prime minister and a defense secretary. the good thing is that it's a more collective way of making decisions. of course, there are decisions made by ministers. you talk about the decisions -- for instance, how we went about our engagement in libya and the decisions we made about syria, they were genuinely discussed around the table with those ministers, with the expert advice and another point, i think a better institutionalization of the legal advice. the attorney general is there to give his opinion about these things. if you're asking, are there times when the n.s.c. comes to a different decision what the defense secretary or prime minister walked into the room, yes, it has. that's what collective decisionmaking is all about. >> we'd like to ask a series of questions on how the system actually works in practice. and you mentioned syr

he is no longer a big story in iran. .ost: let's go to blair caller: i'd like to ask mr. singh if he and members of the washington institute for near east policy ever watch press tv out of iran, and how do they , or the verycism veracity and authenticity of the 9/11 attack itself, most especially when coupled with our own u.s. investigators' conclusions about building seven? this is brought up repeatedly at press tv and i'm wondering how think tanks in washington handle the skepticism's. 9/11 truth or is folly.earing is absolute it is nonsense. the story of 9/11 is well- established and has been well established and it is nonsense to go into that. but you do here skepticism around the world about what is happening in iran and the middle east. what i think is best to do is start with the facts and go from there. john is next on the republican line. i'd like to make a complaint about yesterday's program on the nsa. on for an hour and 15 minutes, had a one-sided and-surveillance viewpoint interrupted a caller as he was making a comment against his own position. sanctions are

i talked to tony blair about british history. mr. dimon and i'm a late conversation about changes in. davos this year. he did not bring up his compensation package. >> that would be uncouth. >> the champagne was very good. >> actions speak louder than words. those are our front page stories. our guest is contributing editor david plouffe. let's go back to the jamie dimon story. despite being at a party and paying for champagne, he has kept a fairly low profile. no headlines generated from his appearance. trust is a big topic. mike mentioned $20 million in fines and settlements that he paid. what does he need to do to regain trust? he obviously has investor trust. >> they are they put this behind them. that is the key thing. have they paid all of the fines? are they out of the trouble? >> they always have more fines. >> more problems coming, more investigations. i will be tough. if they have put this behind them, then there's a strategy. they have to reboot and move beyond. that is what they're hoping. >> they may put it behind them a

he is no longer a big story in iran. .ost: let's go to blair caller: i'd like to ask mr. if he and members of the washington institute for near east policy ever watch press tv out of iran, and how do they , or the verycism veracity and authenticity of the 9/11 attack itself, most especially when coupled with our own u.s. investigators' conclusions about building seven? this is brought up repeatedly at press tv and i'm wondering how think tanks in washington handle the skepticism's. 9/11 truth or is folly.earing is absolute it is nonsense. the story of 9/11 is well- established and has been well established and it is nonsense to go into that. but you do here skepticism around the world about what is happening in iran and the middle east. what i think is best to do is start with the facts and go from there. john is next on the republican line. i'd like to make a complaint about yesterday's program on the nsa. on for an hour and 15 minutes, had a one-sided and-surveillance viewpoint interrupted a caller as he was making a comment against his own position. sanctions aret alre

mrs. netanyahu, president of the biden, court, joe special envoy to the middle east , tony blair, prime ministerch republic, chairman of the state of the russian federation, prime minister of australia, prime minister of , oursset members ,uests from israel and overseas .e are thankful -- you devoted your life to the country. the imprint of your footsteps throughout the country. land.otected the in every military operation, you made important historic decisions. in the early 1950s, i was asked to present a young officer who who hadudent of history .riginal ideas the description i received about poem.unded more like a it was said to me that you are wise and courageous, nonconformist, with courage and , a soldierability and not afraid of the enemy, not afraid of the vision. born for greatness. we informed -- we formed a friendship. there is a youngster way above all of us with the ability to lead us. his words captured our hearts and his soldiers followed him blindly. when one of him -- when one of them was hurt, he never left him until he recovered. he was a brother and a comforter . he told of t

mr. craig morgan. ♪ ♪ wow, this hotel is amazing. oh no. who are you? who are you? wrong answer. wait, daddy, this is blair saved a ton. yeah, i didn't have to bid i got everything i wanted. oh good i always do. oh good he seemed nice. express deals. priceline savings without the bidding. really? 25 grams of protein. what do we have? all four of us, together? 24. he's low fat too, and has five grams of sugars. i'll believe it when i -- [ both ] oooooh... what's shakin'? oops. [ female announcer ] as you get older, protein is an important part of staying active and strong. ensure high protein... 50% of your daily value of protein. low fat and five grams of sugars. see? he's a good egg. [ major nutrition ] ensure high protein. ensure. nutrition in charge! how much money do you think you'll need when you retire? then we gave each person a ribbon to show how many years that amount might last. i was trying to, like, pull it a little further. [ woman ] got me to 70 years old. i'm going to have to rethink this thing. it's hard to imagine how much we'll need for a retirement that could last 30 years or more. so ma

white house limousine coming back from blair house to the white house, and the president is reaching over and taking a hair that had blown, putting it back into place. mrs. kennedy told stanley that it was the most intimate and affectionate photograph that they ever had. and it was spontaneous. john f. kennedy in public was very, very reserved. no public display of affection, rarely held his wife's hand can't even after the inaugural speech, he didn't kiss his wife as most presidents do. so this was an important picture to jackie kennedy. >> host: you have a picture in here of him putting on a late and eating. [laughter] >> guest: yes. he hated -- you know, this was a symbiotic relationship between photographer and the president, because they both cared about getting a good picture. and kennedy refused to be photographed eating or doing anything silly. he wouldn't put on a hat, and the only hat do was willingly where was a hard hat. and he told stanley that he felt the of labor, hard-working labor people could turn out for him, a rich man's son, he was proud to wear their hat. and the only other time he willingly put a hat on was a top hat at his own in

i am sure i mr. blair will forgive me -- prime minister blair will forgive me.rish writer is james joyce and he said, when i die, dublin will be written on my heart. i am absolutely sure the land of is etched on his soul as it was written on joyce's heart. the defining attributes of this great man's character, the passion for the jewish people, physical as well as political courage, and love of this land, they have all played out on the canvas of the state of israel's historic trajectory. his journey and the state of israel are inseparable. they are woven together in war, and politics, and diplomacy. toward the end of his life, he said, i have been everywhere. i have met kings, queens, presidents. i have been around the world. i have one thing i would like to do. piece.to reach we will never know what the ultimate arc of his life would have been had he been physically able to pursue his stated goal. that will be for historians to speculate and debate. what we -- we do know this. as prime minister, he surprised many. i have been told, reflecting on the difference

mr. tony blair. >> the sharon family, mr.ime minister of the czech republic, excellencies and delegations. my official meetings with arik sharon were difficult. he was not comfortable in formal meetings surrounded by protocol. he would read at length from them, repeating and repeating israel's position. really, arik i would say, i understand what you're saying. okay, he would reply, and then pause. but just in case, i will say it again. and then one time i invited him to my home for dinner. no protocol. i wanted to know the man. and now i saw a completely different arik. warmhearted, humorous, charming, and passionate. about his country, of course, but also about his wonderful family and his farming. and over the years we worked together as prime minister's, he took actions no one ever thought he would take, the roadmap, withdraw from gaza. but the ideas that he changed from the man of war to the men of peace, that which defines him, actually he never changed. is strategic objectives never wavered. the states which from the a