interview with mr blank you want until of america's doing this and blah blah and you cannot say that. you cannot say i mean have a public debate in the world i mean this is not but this is not the way to appeal to push public debate and we are we are really making interview we are not making into regulation no it's not supposed to be interesting but i would like to have a conversation it's a conversation has a limit and has a ticket we should loeb's over let's go and if you don't like the way i interview or we just stop right there mr exxon although just before i began to break you were talking about syria being in the sake of different for legends and different strains of islam and i think it was a very rare example of peaceful coexistence of all those various religions in the world but what we are now seeing in syria is essentially be the crash of that idea off peaceful coexistence do you think it could be recreated and if you have any idea how well first of all let me tell you that i feel very set for what's happening because this society historically speaking was one of the most s

interview mr blank come on until america's doing this and blah blah and you cannot say that. why you cannot say we have a public debate in the world i mean this is not a bus this is not the way to prove to push public debate and we are more we are only making interview we are not making into regulation now it's not supposed to be interesting but i would love to have a conversation and it's a call visitation has a limit and has a ticket we should observations let's go and if you don't like the way i interview or we just stop right there mr exxon a little just before i began to break you were talking about syria being in the sake of different religions and different strains of islam and i think it was a very rare example of peaceful coexistence of all those various religions in the world but what we are now seeing in syria is essentially be the crash of that idea off peaceful coexistence do you think it could be recreated and if you have any idea how well first of all let me tell you that i feel very set for what's happening because this society historically speaking was one of

but when congress -- when the choice congress faced when it -- writing on a t blank slate in 2006, mr. chief choice.s, it faced the and the choice was whether the conditions were such that it confidently conclude that this deterrence in this longer needed.no relevant to congress making because it made a cautious hoice in 2006 to keep the constraints and the deterrence in place. >> justice? > there's no question that the voting rights act has done enormous good. it's one of the most successful congress in the 20th century. one could go further than that. hen congress decided to reauthorize it in 2006, why congress incumbent on congruence standard, maybe the whole country should covered or maybe certain parts should be covered based on grounded in t is up-to-date statistics. hy wasn't that required by the proportionalty standards. suppose congress in 1965 based he coverage formula on voting statistics from 1919? earlier. do you think katzenbach would way? out in a different >> what congress did in 2006 was different than in 1965. 2006 was not writing on a clean slate. judgment was made

mr. o'mara said that there's nothing to contradict the idea that he went right from the t back to his car. there's two minutes of blank time in those phone records where this defendant is apparently wandering about the neighborhood. there's two minutes he can't account for. if he's to be believed that he is hit when he says he's hit, the phone records prove that he had plenty of time to cover whatever distance it was, and he says he never got more than a hundred feet from his truck. number two, he keeps changing the meeting location for the police. i mean, that is circumstantial evidence that he's got something else in mind. he wants the police to meet him at the clubhouse. no, okay, go back from the clubhouse, just meet me at my truck instead, never mind all together, just call me when you get here. i'm not going to meet you, you find me. that's not evidence that he is interested in getting to the police right away, nor is getting out of his car in the first place evidence that he is meeting the police there. what it is is evidence, circumstantial at least, that he was going to ensure because the police have always b

mr. o'mara said that there's nothing to contradict the idea that he went right from the tea to his car. there's two minutes of blank time in the phone records where this defendant is apparently wandering about the neighborhood. there's two minutes he can't account for. if he's to be believed that he's hit when he says he's hit, the phone records proof that he had plenty of time to cover whatever distance he was and he said he never got more than 100 feet from his truck. number two, he keeps changing the meeting location for the police. i mean, that is circumstantial evidence that he's got something else in mind. he wants the police to meet him at the clubhouse. no, okay, go back from the clubhouse, just meet me at my truck instead. never mind altogether. just call me when you get here. i'm not going to meet you. you find me. that's not evidence that he is interested in getting to the police right away nor is getting out of his car in the first place evidence that he is interested in meeting the police there. what it is, evidence, circumstantial at least, that he was going to ensure because the police have always be

mr. snowden joins us to talk about edward snowden. he says the american people do not know the whole truth. we'll ask him to fill in the blanks.i's biggest child prostitution sting to date. 150 arrests made, more than 100 children rescued. we'll speak to child safety advocate john walsh about what needs to be done to put a stop to the crimes in the future. and a lot more at the top of the hour. >> all right, anderson, see new a few minutes. >>> and now, tweeting someone's dying moment. over the past few days, npr host scott simon has the tweets to his 1.2 million followers are heartwarming and sad. for instance, when she asked for my help last night, we locked eyes, she calmed down. a look of love that surpasses understanding. a very emotional and public farewell. has this changed what's private forever or are some things too personal to share? hearing is the last sense to go. so i sing and joke. i have so much resecond for scott simon. he does a wonderful job. are these moments too personal to share with 1.2 million people. >> it all depends. if you are tweeting you miss what the person said. i talked to my sister and brother

mr. zimmerman to profile him. as a motivating element within, as a reasonable as a reasonable response. second le you have to use code words, so we leave it to the audience to fill in the blanks. then the prosecutor has to use open-ended questions. the fact he's leaving they questions open, but b, because we have been circumscribed in the production of certainly elements and facts, according to a racial narrative, because that's been riled out's being able to be introduced into the courtroom. so now we are floundering. you can't say what you this i is obvious. the differences are left open-ended, because depending on what that jury thinks, they will either side with the defense or the prosecution, so we're in a very dark and i think ambiguous arena here, and the inability to say with specificity what we think may have been happened is one of the real constraints here, and i think it's showing up in the way in which the prosecution is presenting its case. >> joy, one of the things that the prosecution send a great deal of time doing was redefining the character of rachel jeantel. bernie d bernie de la rionda, sell -- he did like about not attending the funeral, but why? she di

mr. president, would you tell us now if you would accept a third term one reporter asked him point-blank? put on a dunce cap and go stand in the corner. fdr replied with a laugh. not even the members of his own family knew what his real intentions were. of course, one question was whether fdr deserved another four years in the white house. his attorney general, robert jackson, was convinced that war and war alone compelled fdr to run for an unprecedented third term. jackson believed that at least as far as domestic policy was concerned, the president had already pulled everything out of his new deal bag of tricks. only the foreign crisis justified a possible third term. of course, fdr's own ambition also played a role. some democrats had accused him of torpedoing all the other potential candidates, but in fact, the widely president had done the opposite. he encouraged them all to run. secretary of state, former indiana governor, senate majority leader, new york governor, and even his isolationist ambassador to great britain, joseph kennedy, who salivated at the idea of occupying the white