more shares will be very rewarding the first recurs mr byrd. users are already under new comparable after mature skin energy conditions and. in g.q. she's learning deja news from asia is some of your arm or the most or in the human ear she. was. very liberal decides the three r.'s are sure. there are enough are. there you can you know. from her are in at the out and still command protozoa got to be a it requires from him for you not understand what i did you and i gather a fearsome and i would actually read in the e.q. persuasion your misery was in there and i want to from the. good old. us of felice that are our group. colette resort. i mean the. world one way or the. moon but it will mean that that's the out see doesn't. mean you money nice nice to. see what. was not money. see what we do this is the. money and. perezhogin yeah. we just went down to. another. ranch and rest of. what you want on your because almost at the muzzle goshen saloon the bull. stood at the couldn't be such. a little too late when you got me my. lady billing you all go

more shares me very well in the first rehearsal mr byrd. used for the rhythm during your promotion of the mature skin or you could be a fuse and you key it in get you freezer in the can is from a freeze some of you are more stirred and very human if you. were the sun . the e.u. and. the our earth a liberal or a poseur if the three years are sure. there were enough or killed. he would be a new not good for her right. at that and still coming in pretty good. for. it with the new numbers store and i did you and i get there if pearson my production were in the persuasion your misery was in there and i wrote it from the good old. us of from the start our group. called the resort of. the. green money nice nice to. see would. be. residue but as the opposite it went on to. another. round. rest of. what you want on your because almost at the most of the ocean syllable you learned this is a statistical wouldn't be such when you belong to look at lincoln you got me mug. you'll go to the do yes dollar bill but be right. if you do come you're bullish. f

mr. byrd, no. mr. isaacson, no. mr. portland, no. cashoomey proxy.y mr. scott, no. mr. cassidy yakked -- mr. cassidy? mr. demirtas -- missed that are mr.mr. carper, ipo -- warner,aye. -- mr. chairman, mr. chairman votes no. >> circle reports. >> holdup, mr. chairman. >> mr. brown? mr. brown, aye. andfinal tally is 12 ayes, 14 nay's. >> this amendment would require a certification by the nonpartisan scorekeepers at the joint committee on taxation and the congressional budget office. they are the people that are doing independent work and that no proposal in this legislation would kick americans off their health care, increase their health insurance premiums and hiked taxes on middle-class americans. after several days of discussions, it has become clear that some members in this room want to deny the consequences of this bill that is focused overwhelmingly on tax breaks for the wealthy corporations. there has been an awful luck of rhetorical gymnastics but the hike onine is the tax $14 million -- 14 million middle-class americans is a tax cut on average across the variet

more shares will be there everywhere in the first records mr byrd.this was a rhythm from your comparable after mature skin energy conditions and you key in g.q. freezer in the can information is some of your arm from which they are in the human which. was. a. very liberal group aside from the three reasons for. them right now. are. there you can you not confirm her are in at the out and still command protozoa parts and getting it requires from him for you not understand or did you but i gather a fearsome might go with the actual ring in the e.q. persuade your misery was in there and i want to from the. good with the. use of felice that are our own crew. colette resort. i mean the. world one way or the. moon but it will mean that that's the out see doesn't. mean money nice nice to. see what. was not money. it was just see what would exist at the. moment. there's. a subject right down to. a number. below ground zero rest of. what you want on your because almost at the most of the ocean some of the building this is a what you stood at the core of for su

mr. byrd no,. mr. portman. no. mr. too many mi. no by proxy. mr. heller, no. mr. scott. no. mr. cassidy. no by proxy. mr. wyden. aye. ms. stabenow. aye. ms. cantwell. aye. mr. nelson. aye. mr. menendez. aye by proxy. mr. carper, aye by proxy. mr. cardin, aye. mr. brown, aye by proxy. mr. bennett, aye. mr. casey, aye. mr. warner. aye by proxy. ms. mccaskill. aye by proxy. mr. chairman. mr. chairman votes no. final tally is 12 ayes, 14 nays. >> amendment is defeated. we're going to take a 15-minute break right now and come back. with that, we break for 15 minutes. >> and the senate finance committee taking a short break here. s the fourth day of its review of the senate tax reform proposal. over in the house today passing its tax reform bill 227-205 with no democrats voting for the house measure, 13 republicans voting against it. and the legislation over in the house calling for a partial repeal of state and local income tax deductions and doubling the standard deductions for single filers and those who are married. and that tax reform plan again limited to $1.5 trillion over 10 y

byrd rule? >> i'm not at liberty to make those assumptions or assurances at the moment. >> this is just incredible. this is so unfair to the people that i represent. this process and these answers. mr. barthold, at a time when we're nearing full employment, is permanent tax policy more supportive of growth than temporary tax policy, all else held equal? >> permanent policy is generally better in any economic environment because of the uncertainty of the temporary policy, sir. >> what about a permanent corporate tax rate versus a temporary tax rate cut? >> i would actually like to work with my colleagues to run the analysis on it rather than wing it from the table. >> i don't think it would be winging it asking that question. i mean, the answer to that question is obviously it would significantly deter growth if tax cuts are to sunset, don't you agree with that? >> as i said, permanent policy is always better in any

permanency of certain provision is going to be very difficult toy achieve because of the byrd rule under reconciliation. mr. chairman my first concern is are we really going to give the american public a tax code that is certain. and i can't answer that because we are being asked to use a process that doesn't even give us the tax proposal that we are going to be taking up in this committee. i also, mr. barthold, want to challenge the chairman's assessment on the distributional charge of just for one moment if i might. i know that is very difficult to do a distributional chart on business income relief and i applaud your professionalism in trying to deal with that. as i understand it you didn't even attempt to do it in regards to the estate tax relief that $94 billion are not reflected in the distributional charts. is that accurate? >> that's correct. would you like me to explain why? >> you could if you want. but i just want to make sure that we know that we are not dealing with the $94 billion of tax relief that is provided under the chairman's mark that goes to the billionaire families. i understand you

byrd rule? >> i'm not at liberty to make those assumptions or assurances at the moment. >> this is just incredible. this is so unfair to the people that i represent. this process and these answers. mr. barthold, at a time when we're nearing full employment, is permanent tax policy more supportive of growth than temporary tax policy, all else held equal? >> permanent policy is generally better in any economic environment because of the uncertainty of the temporary policy, sir. >> what about a permanent corporate tax rate versus a temporary tax rate cut? >> i would actually like to work with my colleagues to run the analysis on it rather than wing it from the table. >> i don't think it would be winging it asking that question. i mean, the answer to that question is obviously it would significantly deter growth if tax cuts are to senate, don't you agree with that? >> as i said, permanent policies always is better in any environment. i thought you were asking for a relative magnitude. >> no, i wasn't. so i appreciate your answer. i'm sorry i wasn't clear. mr. chairman, thank you for the opportunity. >> thank you. senator crapo. >> thank you very much, mr. chairman. mr. barthold, with r