increase even more it increased and that we will increase even more if we will and this is why mr calderon is not is not happy about this policy we will spend on infrastructural pensions. by almost a factor of one and a half we raced and we raised spending on the police and there there are all all avenues of spending very rushed is actually spending more and more and more and part of that is because i think the call on the call more the russian government is to sustain the popularity through more spending well. the finance minister the former finance minister he was labelled to be a liberal he characterized the liberal the liberal wing of the russian public policy makers russian government. was his financial policy really liberal and are we facing the end of the liberal finance policy in which its financial policy will be rather characterized as conservative and responsible rather than liberal because it is not the job of finance minister to be liberal or not his job is to keep the budget balanced or in surplus or no prices high to pay for say for the reign of the women prices goes down an

decision to increase the military budget of russia was a joint decision by the government of russia mr calderon included supported later on by the president of russia the basic idea of this decision is north to storage and you arms freeze the basic idea is to re inforce the russian military sector and to to to missed more money in the military industry off russia. there and in the scientific sector of the russian economy to support officers who serve in the army to support a military partial nearest or this is a very complex program and it is not meant to to to to to or to respond to the project or any other projects of or for for our partners or poignance in the military area and i believe that the final increase as you remember we are going to spend today into trillions of rubble securing the coming ten years the final result of it will be in any case much much lower then the current expenditure on military purposes by nato countries ok well we will . maybe we will have time to talk about further about and time missile and space defense and even about the russian plans to shoot down asteroids

mr. mack, we agree on a great deal. i don't really think it matters whether -- i mentioned that president calderÓn said it was 90%, and inct, in jamaica, the prime minister says it's more than 90% in his country. it doesn't matter whether it's 70% or 90%, i think what matters is that illegal guns are coming into this country and then going south of the border. we know that these people who set up gun shops on the texas-mexico border or gun shows or things like that to sell multi. -- multiple guns, we know where the guns are going. it's way beyond second amendment rights. if we are to identify terrorism in mexico as a threat as you say, if we are going to say that this is a real problem with the drug cartels, we have to do something to curve the illegal flow of guns coming from the united states and south of the border. let me quote secretary clinton in march of 2009. she said, quote, "we know very well that the drug traffickers are motivated by the demand of illegal drugs in the united states, and that they are armed by the transport of weapons from the united states." to me, this means in effect that the united states h