mr chidambaram may have it.that you had 90% of the de—monetised money coming back into the banks, number one... now regarded as legitimate. it is not legitimate any more. because that money now has an address. next step is for them to account for that money. it's the second step which has been very conveniently left out. just because money is deposited into the banks doesn't make it legitimate. had that been the case, we would not have had money—laundering operations. done through normal banking operations. i think what is very important is that the critics of mr modi were struck by one thing, the sheer audacity of this. something which takes into account 86% of the cash which was in circulation in india was de—monetised. it affected every single indian. rich, poor, everyone was affected by this decision. why was it endorsed? everyone suffered personal inconvenience in some way or another, some more, some less. but there was a certain determination on the part of people that, look, the cancer has gone too far, p