mr ishaq. sorry, can you repeat that- you — mr ishaq. sorry, can you repeat that.t. you subsequently and we | mr ishaq. sorry, can you repeat. that. you subsequently and we will see ou that. you subsequently and we will see you took _ that. you subsequently and we will see you took a _ that. you subsequently and we will see you took a statement - that. you subsequently and we will see you took a statement from i that. you subsequently and we will see you took a statement from the j see you took a statement from the subpostmaster that followed mr ishaq's sub suspension. you've included in a witness statement that no problems or discrepancies had been reported. are we to read on to the fact that you said had been reported means that in order to make that statement all you looked at was whether a problem or discrepancy had been reported? by, whether a problem or discrepancy had been reported?— whether a problem or discrepancy had been reported? a statement was taken from the interim _ been reported? a statement was taken from the interim postmaster— been reported? a s

who came after mr ishaq-- you _ sub—postmaster who came after mr ishaq. d the other statement could have been earlierfrom a man called leah cot. i do could have been earlier from a man called leah cot.— called leah cot. i do recall that name. called leah cot. i do recall that name- the _ called leah cot. i do recall that name. the opening _ called leah cot. i do recall that name. the opening night i called leah cot. i do recall that name. the opening night for i called leah cot. i do recall that. name. the opening night for the called leah cot. i do recall that- name. the opening night for the case only referred — name. the opening night for the case only referred to _ name. the opening night for the case only referred to mr _ name. the opening night for the case only referred to mr patel. _ name. the opening night for the case only referred to mr patel. i _ name. the opening night for the case only referred to mr patel. i am i only referred to mr patel. i am going to try to assist in memory as to who took over after mr ishaq. there was a leah cot who feat

seems that it was only your statement and the statement that we have just seen that was served on mr ishaqed on mr ishat. ., , . , ishaq. the other statement might be served earlier. _ ishaq. the other statement might be served earlier, i _ ishaq. the other statement might be served earlier, i do _ ishaq. the other statement might be served earlier, i do recall— ishaq. the other statement might be served earlier, i do recall that - served earlier, i do recall that name. ~ .. served earlier, i do recall that name. ~ ., . name. we will look for that additional _ name. we will look for that additional statement. - name. we will look for that additional statement. it. name. we will look for that i additional statement. it then says... we note that your client has said that the post office horizon system had in the past on numerous occasions malfunctioned causing difficulties in reconciling stock figures and sales receipts, please let us have particulars of the numerous malfunctions your client has referred. do you think that was a sufficient response to the various issues that mr ishaq had rai