mr kalanick referred in court that he wrote the this phrase on the white board and that he knew how tostrategy in this case the make case relies on painting kalanick is a man so determined to catch up with self driving but he was willing to use underhanded tactics.. waymo need to prove that to be used the trade secrets to create self driving technology at hoover. their attempt to do that that with kalanick is backin to do that that with kalanick is back in court on wednesday. —— self driving technology at hoover. with brexit talks under way, the uk government is hoping to begin negotiating trade deals with countries outside of the eu when it leaves the union in march 2019. according to research by the commonwealth, a free trade deal would cause uk exports to india to rise by a third. meanwhile imports of goods from india into the uk would increase by 12%. but for deal talks to progress — india wants the uk to make visa rules easier. the bbc‘s sameer hashmi spoke to the uk's minister of state for trade and exports baroness rona fairhead in mumbai and began by asking if britain was willi

mr kalanick believes the technology is vital if uber is to survive.d that he stole more than 111,000 alleged documents and then left google to set up his own company, then he sold it to uber. in a remarkable moment during the trial, the jury was shown this scene from the 1989 film wall street. the prosecution said travis kalanick acted like a real—life gordon gecko. the point is, ladies and gentlemen, that greed, for lack of a better word, is good. greed is right. but convincing jurors that mr kalanick is something of a slippery operator was not going to be enough to win the case. what the prosecution had to demonstrate was that uber was using the stolen technology, and that was proving much more difficult. and so, the risk for google would have been that they were a bully and if they went after a competitor in order to suppress competition, rather than to vindicate their legitimate intellectual property rights. conversely the risk for uber, by continuing, would have been, well, what if we lose the whole thing? and so, this settlement is perhaps a goo

mr kalanick believes the technology is vital if uber is to survive.e anthony levandowski. it was alleged that mr lewandowski stole more than 111,000 alleged documents and then left google to set up his own company, then he sold it to uber. in a remarkable moment during the trial, the jury was shown this scene from the 1989 film wall street. the prosecution said travis kalanick acted like a real—life gordon gecko. the point is, ladies and gentlemen, that greed, for lack of a better word, is good. greed is right. but convincing jurors that mr kalanick is something of a slippery operator was not going to be enough to win the case. what the prosecution had to demonstrate was that uber was using the stolen technology, and that was proving much more difficult. and so, the risk for google would have been that they were a bully and that they went after a competitor in order to suppress competition, rather than to vindicate their legitimate intellectual property rights. conversely the risk for uber, by continuing, would have been, well, what if we lose the who