bit of hello mr lavrov i have only two questions the first test to do with a yesterday's negotiations with mr hoffa have you reached the criminal to it today not to states to hold a conference like that in spite of the differences on iran's participation for the second question is that there is some information on syria asking russia china and other. countries to hold an investigation on the whole a massacre. do you support a suggestion to hold an international investigation in hama and houla under the aegis of the united nations thank you. first in my consultations with fred hough it was actually not myself two of my dippy days were engaged in those talks me bug done the thing you know to get to a level of that is ringing and there was no clues there was not a definite no no right here's regarding the conference so we just agreed to continue discussions on the subject yesterday i talked to coffee and about that we. still you know we want this conference. if you could see it to be acceptable for it to be effective we need to have all the parties who influence various sides involved in

mr lavrov over the last taste we have heard of some eighty years to. work out in more detail of the annan plan and about the deadlines. what would you say about this idea. in terms of developing the annan plan further i would say we can only make it more details i don't think it's no longer relevant you know every part of this plan is still relevant but in the borders deal for each point especially those points that have to do with stopping violence and starting political dialogue we need to make it more concrete more detailed and this is what the conference we're talking about you supposed to do supposed to help with we need the mechanism to very fired that all parties have stopped the military. activities so we need a mechanism for. opening a political dialogue and this is what we are going to discuss at the conference s. for timeline for this plan. once again this is just an attempt to use ultimatums and then when time expires they'll say we will not extend the mandate for un observers and then it will have this critical situation. when the internat

mr lavrov you mentioned when i was cited for you you could get a whole rushes. that i see cooking with because i just got it was a typical of which there was. a console and when you come on that when you question if that of russia and america yes i mean it's got a social pressure and american citizens second question have russia and the us discussed a yemen scenario according to which i said well resign and leave syria thank you if you can respond in english i'll be very grateful. you know we have enough for information that you know if evidence about arms being supplied to the syrian opposition. so that arms and.

would only make a decision wishing worse and the your father in the russian foreign minister mr sergei lavrov had clearly pointed. off before the trying to clear position that they refuse. they would veto i mean they hinted that they would veto any decision that or any project for decision that would be laid out in the security council that would call for military intervention because that would only make the situation worse so but i heard today also reports coming from moscow that there is a call for an international conference. to be organized by the russian or thor it is for friends of syria the true friends of syria not the friends of one side or another not the friends of one party that would favor one party over another nor a conference that could be held in russia for all the people who are concerned with the well being of the syrian people to get out of this this harbored. situation there in that is taking the country into destruction. let's talk about the opposition fighters u.n. observers now openly admit coordinated attacks by rebels have increased so why are we still seeing pressu

mr. lavrov and what have we gotten in terms of that? the russians have been obstructive on iran.yria. the russian chief of general staff presents a preemptive attack on missile defense sites in europe to which by the way we don't react. russian military doctrine identifies us as their chief opponent, and in return president obama's instinct is to say, please tell vladimir i will be more -- in my second term. >> do you agree with his remark? >> i agree. here is what i agree with. i agree that russia is on the whole opposed to american interest, that the putin regime, which is an ugly regime, and ugly regime and we don't talk much about its ugliness, and it is getting uglier, is not our friend and many ways hostile to us. and i think it's important to identify the people who are hostile. >> very short on time and i also want to talk about governing so i want to ask jim, first and second term -- reagan tears down the wall and clinton and bush are engaged in all of this. what you think a second term for obama might mean in terms of mid-course correction? >> let me know that nixon rem