the libyan regime political parties which would busy attacking you for trying or for releasing mr mclaughlin compassionate their own party leadership civil to me asli been trying to get a release didn't lead investment on oil plans or political parties our governments were shameful in the poko see they were double dealing i'd always known that scotland was a small colgan are they quil and never realized how small or cold we were or hope bigger wheel a month after i was being criticized for releasing the guy it was coming to light that the british through the police service of northern ireland were treating gadhafi elite battalion it's also since become clear that through and this with assistance of united states rendering prisoners to come good afi so this was about building a relationship between the west and gadhafi and scotland was slapped about mercilessly i believe we did the right thing and yet britain and america where conniving to achieve what we delivered bleeding us for doing what we did for the right reasons and when i was in the desert for ten couple gadhafi it was uppermost in h

mr. mclaughlin raises serious point as former cia leader, it's hard to explain as coincidence, and if it'sesident of the united states immediately giving in. crying uncle would suggest resisted but not even four hours, it's givening putin pr. >> and possible collusion between the trump campaign and moscow, the wikileaks tweet you played comes to mind. and set off other alarm bells. why is the president appearing to advocate for kremlin stifling of free speech and attacking -- for free speech. sanctions, friends with russia, why can't we get along. he still casts doubt on the fact that russia meddled in the election. thinking to the 300 pound man hacking on his bed or recently russia's influence at all, saying he believes putin. big question is why. does the kremlin have compromising material on the president so he feels obligated to do this? does he just like putin and kremlin and feels like backing him up? kind of things set off major alarm bells. also he's attacking free press. investigation is huge part of this. >> ambassador to russia under trump, jon huntsman was asked about this. and

mr. henderson, how about mark mclaughlin of palo alto, he isn't saying we can't talk to them, i think he'll say let's see what we can get for this company. >> you raise a great point they'll be relied on by broadcom, a hope to introduce that talk in the board meeting where they discuss this, but i fully expect that the initial response will be a rejection, jim, of course based at least on reporting i've been able to do thus far the question will be what does broadcom do? do they go all out hostile here? do they undertake a proxy fight to try to place members on qualcomm's board and need to decide that within the next month. the deadline for nominating board members will come up very soon typically qualcomm has the meeting in march and that will put shareholders in a difficult position because you'll be needing to make a decision on board members without really knowing the decision on antitrust alternatively broadcom could wait a year and a half before they get the antitrust approval to go after the board if they want to go that route. >> go ahead, jim >> haq tan takes a long term view he cr

mr. kushner's own contacts. here with more on that story is jenna mclaughlin, intelligence reporter with foreign policy magazine. what's the significance of the fact that the contacts with wikileaks were forwarded to campaign folks including jared kushner? >> well, i mean, the significance of that is jared kushner saw them. he was aware of them and passed them onto hope hicks. we see with kushner he's selective with his words. he may be saying, oh, i didn't communicate, i was just aware of it and possibly forwarded it on. >> now, there's a really key part of this, which is that your reporting suggests that during his capitol hill testimony, he was actually asked about contacts with wikileaks, is that correct? >> yes, that's correct. and in several different sessions, he denied that he or anyone else in the campaign had had any contact with wikileaks or julian assange. >> okay, so i just want to be clear on that, so he repeatedly before congress, and i don't know if ever under oath or not, but before congress repeatedly said, no one in the campaign, nor he, had any contact with julian assange, is that right? >> y