then we will hear a ten minute -- we will hear ten minutes for mr michael lee from the planning departmentpresent his analysis and certifying the real parties and interest to present the project speaking on behalf of oewd -- we will have two minutes of public comments for people to speak joke -- speak in support of the affirmation of the environmental impact report and then finally, each appellant will have up to two minutes for rebuttal and arguments. i don't see any objections. supervisor brown? >> supervisor brown: thank you i just wanted to state, before my appointment as supervisor, i worked in the office of economic and workforce development. a natural, one of my tasks was to ensure the city looked at equity and housing by engaging the community in the area and provide local residents with information about affordable housing and workforce opportunities. this was to address their community feedback of who are we building this housing for? if the surrounding community does not qualify for affordable housing? i was not paid by the project sponsor. i did not play any role in planning or

mr. lee's time? thank you. >> president cohen and members of the board, my name is michael lee and i'm the planning department's eir coordinator for the india basin mixed-use project. the item before you is the appeal of planning commission's certification of the india basin eir. the commission certified the eir and approved the project on july 26th, 2018. the two appeals were filed. the first appeal was filed by archimedes banya sf and 748 innes avenue hoa and the second by greenaction. as stated in the department's september 17th appeal response and september 21st supplemental appeal response, the india basin eir is adequate, accurate, and complete, and it complies with ceqa, the ceqa guidelines, and chapter 31 of the san francisco administrative code. the department has addressed all of the issues raised in the appeal in our appeal response and supplemental appeal response. i'll briefly highlight some of the issues mentioned by the appellants today and the department's responses to the appellants' claims. regarding air quality impacts, the eir disclosed that implementation of the project would result in sign