health and environmental safety coincidentally the judge was rodney simple the same judge as in mr rolfs case the case was ruled in favor of the chemical companies. raising. the gene in my field was a patient and monsanto gene which was sold to me in seeds by as a girl which is a monsanto subsidiary i agreed to take part in a class action lawsuit in the united states so in two thousand i went to washington d.c. to testify to answer the questions asked by monsanto's lawyers all day they asked questions such as do you know your neighbors names i much tax do you pay and where nothing to do with g.m. seeds. i tended to meetings at the ministry of agriculture recently during which they tried to impose on us a bill for a ministerial order for coexistence determining a twenty five yard distance between two fields of corn. that means that my neighbor g.m. crops twenty five yards away from my field and yes we officially proved in two thousand and six and two thousand and seven that plant three hundred yards away was contaminated. maybe there's not much organic corn today. maybe someone with five

mr rolfe was fined over two point nine million dollars infringement in regards to say you can see. the district judge mr else case was rodney simple a former attorney who worked at a law firm that represents monsanto and who is listed as one of monsanto's attorneys in one thousand nine hundred ninety seven class action lawsuit. from two thousand two thousand and eight you say it was the judge in eleven cases of which monsanto was the plaintiff or defendant. eleven cases were ruled in monsanto his favor. i found that the original research grants came from the new york foundation and that was the rockefeller foundation and that they had spent over one hundred million dollars of their foundation money to finance scientists around the world to do research to genetically modify some of the basic food seeds of the human food chain an animal from change and the more i researched into this the more i found that three maybe four companies if you include the swiss think enter but three main companies and one among them was dominant and that's monsanto but these are what i call in the book the

rolf. in t s a d allheoaav >>o. beuse ol wer rea tngt all as >> huma resoce mbetere er teat we nted a t solv maso mr a b tausewe ed t r olvelvitho a amajo bse ot rve ho yout ijo g resveditho utus ihavi to toourt g wees d dn'thoeel e ne vio shao i withhertwe brd. 'td itl netereing thathan i th artthlehe th be. p opleit re gthatidat go blic- thrt th>>ou p mlen in at to ic min litc trtic. >>hat aicle the ree ople tcic >>t th ale e we e leth blicasehe pst char,he ic pha exisng cirmaand the in comi cairm. ththre peop stised i cmathdhe ticlnand mi crmttesd threopt to i m cl d chacte aes myto m intrity chey dten't aen myow aut becae itasn' antty dt bi a iss that as bcawnitn' thathey needbito kssw boutatecau b of thhaey w it s ne resved kutauf th byy wt stf. >>idesd you of ehey s tlemt st agemen>> wit her ouf n >> y semidn' signageniter it >> no. don'reca n sig yngn'gnit it. noo. theact hatn'caig sy i n't t. re llnohettigni it,doest si t eanre at iidn'sign it,ni butt,es i an mply on't in'gnt,ecalifut i gned it. ly 't >> youali ed . ntiooudtholi o io arcle ere mbersf th ard me t vytroly fli ar e eu. mrs >>th ye in d e sa vro