mr. rose, can we go to your report, please, for dpw? >> yes, mr. chairman, members of the committee. on page 41 of our report, our recommended reductions for proposed budget total 536,0 56 in 14-15. of that amount, 265,2 41 are ongoing and 270 are one-time savings. these reductionses would still allow an increase of 58.5 million or 36.7% for the department's 15-16 budget. we also recommend closing out prior year general fund expended encumbrances, which would allow the return of [speaker not understood]. mr. chairman, if you look at the next paragraphs, those numbers don't add up to what the general fund is because it's only a portion that is general fund cut. so, together those recommendations will result in 363,746 savings to the city's general fund. i just wanted to point out to the committee in case they added it up, if it doesn't add up to that amount. our recommended reductions to the proposed budget total 86 6,6 81 in 15-16. of that amount 298,0 78 are ongoing. 5 63 are one time. these reductions would still allow an increase of 12.1 million

mr. rose, could we go to the revised report. >> yes, mr. chairman and members of the committee on page 6 of the report, recommended of the reduction, 323,757, of that amount, savings and reductions still allow an increase of 8 million dollars, or 27, 283,195, and of that amount, the department incurs with the recommended reductions on page 7 and 8 of the report. >> any questions for mr. rose or for mr. m? >> okay, do we have a motion, supervisor mar and breed? could i have a motion to accept the recommendations? >> the motion that you can take that without objection? >> thank you very much. >> okay. and up next, we have the district attorney's office. >> good morning, share ferrill, and supervisors, kristine, standing in for the district attorney. we have reached agreement with the budget analyst on their proposed cuts, and happy to answer any questions, if you have any. >> okay, thank you, mr. beary, if no more questions, why don't we go to your report mr. rose. >> on page 13 of our report, i recommended reductions to the proposed budget,

okay mr. rose. >> yes mr. chairman, members of the committee on page 53 of our report our recommended reductions to the proposed budget total 582,536 and we have on going savings. and we have one time savings. these reductions would allow increase of 6,234,484 or 9% in the departments of 14-15 budget. the reductions recommend 174,801 in 15-16 and we have on going savings and we have one time savings. these would allow an increase of nine /10 of a percent in the budget and as the director stated we are working with the department and will report back next week. >> okay. thank you mr. rose. colleagues any questions? okay. thanks we will see you next wednesday. >> thank you very much. >> thank you everyone. we will go into recess until 145. we will see you then. [gavel] >> we're at our regularly scheduled meeting for wednesday, june 18, 2014. we are in the middle of hearing items 1 and 2 for the 2014, 15, 16 budget. we'll pick it up. up next is our public offender and we have mr. adachi here and we'll get moving.

by mr. rose, and i'm going to agree with three out of four of them which i think is pretty good for the public defender. we agree with the $15,000 reduction in the medical examiner services, we agree with the 29,000 reduction in our equipment budget and again, we agree reluctantly. these are things that we very much need. and we agree with the $5,000 reduction in material and supplies. what we do not agree with is with the $55,000 reduction in attrition savings and this will explain, mr. rose, i'm sure is going to stand up and commend me and my office for delivering a $623,000 surplus this year. as you are he call, chair farrell, this is the promises i made to you when we fixed our salary saves program. salary saving is that number we've su month poesed -- we're supposed to save with employees on leave. we had an unusual large number of employees who took lead that is year, and you can see the number there. we had 28 employees who at various times took and they weren't out at the same time, but d

mr. rose, i'm sure is going to stand up and commend me and my office for delivering a $623,000 surplus this year. as you are he call, chair farrell, this is the promises i made to you when we fixed our salary saves program. salary saving is that number we've su month poesed -- we're supposed to save with employees on leave. we had an unusual large number of employees who took lead that is year, and you can see the number there. we had 28 employees who at various times took and they weren't out at the same time, but different times but it equalled $623,000 in savings. the three that i've noted here are the three investigators and those three investigators because they weren't able to fill these positions for over nine months, we saved close to $200,000. these savings are not going to repeat themselves next year. in fact, if you look at -- for 2014-15, we only have 11 vacancies and if you look at your packet, we actually set forth the hiring delays and leaves that we're anticipating. we're proje

mr. rose.nd seeing no further questions, we will open this up for public comment and anybody wish to comment on item five? >> ♪ >> thank you very much, anyone else like to comment on item five. seeing none, public comment is closed we have a budget analyst recommendation with the retroactivity and a motion to accept? >> a motion to accept the budget analyst recommendation and to approve the resolution and move forward with the recommendation. >> okay, we have a motion to accept the amendment and we can take that without objection. >> could you call item 6? >>resolution approving and authorizing the execution of modification no. 2 to lease l10-0275 with continental airlines, inc., at san francisco international airport to grant early termination of the lease. 3/31/14; received from departmen it. >> thank you. >> and hello? >> hello, good morning, chair farrell and supervisor avalos and the item before you seeks the approval for the modification two in order to the airport to terminate our lease

just, mr. rose, if you could summarize what the differences are right now between your office and the department of technology? >> it's a process of getting more details, supervisor. we laid out our recommendations to them. we think our recommendations are good. they're coming back with additional documentation and once we reconcile that, we can refer back to you next week. >> okay, if you can keep my office posted in the meantime. >> absolutely. >> that would be great. >> okay, colleagues, any further questions or comments to mr. rose or mr. tuitui? okay, thattionv. we look forward to seeing you next monday and working that out in between. okay. up next we have our human rights commission. this ~ >> i'll do it the old-fashioned way. i'm not much of a technologist. it's interesting going from the department of technology to the human rights commission. i'm not so sure you could get much further apart. good morning, supervisors, mr. chair. i'm [speaker not understood] sparks, director of the human ri

mr. rose, why don't we go to your report. >> mr. chairman and members of the committee. just to put this budget into perspective, the public defender is requesting a budget of $30 million. the budget analyst has recommended total recommended reductions of $75,000. our recommendation to increase salary savings by $55,000 is very conservative. it has given the public defender more than what he needs. if he can provide us documentation with two other recommendations, but based upon what we've seen, our recommendations is conservative. you can't calculate the percentage of this reduction to the $30 million budget request. so the fact that the public defender is agreeing with a couple of our recommendations doesn't mean a thing to me. anyway, mr. chairman and members of the committee, on page 68 of our report, our recommended reduction to the proposed budget totaling $75,000 in 2014-15, those are all ongoing savings and will increase $2014-15, those are all ongoing savings and will increase an increase of $1.58 million or 5.4 percent reduction. the total budget is -- $73,000

mr. rose, can we go to your updated report, please? >> yes, mr. chairman, members of the committee. on page 5 of our report we report that our recommended reductionses to the proposed budget total $165,83 1 in 14-15. all of that amount are ongoing savings. these reductions would still allow an increase with 4,760,387 or 13.6% and the department's 15-16 working budget. we also recommend closing out prior year unexpended general fund encumbrances which would amount to [speaker not understood]. together those recommendations result in 255,7 81 savedles to the city's general fund in 14-15. our recommended reductionses to the proposed budget total 199,340 in the 14-15-16. you will amendment, [speaker not understood] recommended reductions are ongoing savings. as the department has indicated as we understand it, they are in concurrence with our recommended reductions which are on page 7 of our report. >> thank you, mr. rose. actually 6 and 7. >> colleagues, any questions for mr. rose or for mr. cisneros? okay, thanks very much for being here. >> thank you. up next we have our public defen

mr. rose's presentation. >> yes, mr. chairman and members of the committee. first of all, on page 18 of our report regarding item 7, that's the neighborhood beautification graffiti clean up [speaker not understood] tax designation. we recommend that you do approve that ordinance as well as item 8, the access line tax. we recommend that you approve that proposed resolution. on page 19 of our report, our recommended reductions to the proposed budget total 275 in 14-15. they're all ongoing savings. [speaker not understood] or 11.5% for the department's 14-15 budget. our recommendation [speaker not understood] 275,000 in 15-16 of that amount, all 275,000 are ongoing savings. and as i understand it, the department concurs with our recommendations. >> okay, thank you very much, mr. rose. colleagues, any question for our budget analyst? okay, on our gera

mr. rose, could we go to your report, please? >> of course, mr.n and members of the committee, on page 36 of our report, we report that hsa will pay, 22,113 dollars per month in rent for a total of 265, and that is the first year and that includes, the base rent and the first year's operating costs as well as $118,070 to advertise the city, improvements of approximately 1.1 million dollars. and as summarized in table five on page 37 of the report, hsa is projected to pay a total of 2 million, 823,404 dollars over the nine year term of the proposed sublease, our recommendation on page 38 we recommend that you amend to add a further resolve clause that it is the policy of the board of supervisors that leases should be submitted to the board of supervisors for approval prior to the effective date of the lease and prior to the department occupying the lease or the premises and we recommend that you approve the resolution as amended. >> thank you, mr. rose, colleagues any questions for our budget analyst? >> okay, we will open this up for public commen

. >> mr. rose why don't we go to your report please. >> mr. chairman and members of the committee on page 45 of our report our recommended reduction to the proposed budget are listed for 14-15 and we have ongoing savings and we have one time savings and reductions would allow a reduction of 2.9% in the fiscal year budget. our recommended reduction to processed total is listed for 15-16. of that amount -- all of the 906518 is on going savings and the reduced are listed and.3% less than the mayor's office proposed budget. we are working with the department and will report back next week on the recommendations. >> thank you mr. rose. any further questions to mr. rose and the fire department? okay. thank you. we will see you next wednesday. let's get dm through before we break for lunch here. >> chair farrell, members of the budget and finance committee thank you for squeezing us in before the lunch break. i am the director of emergency management. as you know the departme emergency -- as you know the department of emergency management -- could yo

thank you mr. rose. >> colleagues do we have any questions for mr. rose or puc i know we'll be back? okay supervisor avalos any comments now we're going to move into the other departments >> i'll hold my comments and after public comment i'm going to motion that we table the items of the a o s o and other items related to the puc and actually, i don't mind it can you see me great pain to do that our puc is the most incredible educate we have with the city and county of san francisco i have traced to the water system and our amazing people the puc but we have not worked 90 out in a collaborative way for a budget we can live with interests been a effort to communicate with the mayor directly i haven't heard back i'm alarmed of the candid tender we have we will have a new budget to come before us and one we workout our differences and shared common interests to make sure we have water coming to the residents all over the bay area and electricity for the city and our great folks in the bay area as well i want to indicate that's y where i'm going thank you

okay, mr. rose, can we move to your report, please? >> mr. chairman, members of the committee, on page 61 of our report, recommended reductions to the proposed budget total 296,4 36 n. 14-15 of that amount 1 million 850 and $10 dollars ongoing savings 246,000 for 26 or one-time savings. these reductions would still allow an increase of 9 46,335 or 2/10 of a percent in the department's working 15-16 budget. i recommended reductions to the proposed budget for 1 million 727,154 in 15-16. that of amount 1 million 586,652 are ongoing savings and 146,5 02 are ongoing saving. [speaker not understood] 4/10 of a percent in the department's 15-16 budget. as the chief has indicated, we are still working with the department and we will report back next week to the committee. >> okay, thank you, mr. rose. colleagues, any further questions for mr. rose, chief at this point? anything else? >> no, just -- i would agree with the budget analyst. we appreciate spirit of cooperation. we'll figure it out. >> okay, see you back next week. >> thank you. >> all righ

. >> thank you very much, mr. rose. colleagues, any questions for mr. rose at this time? okay. thank you very much. look forward to speaking mid week and also in the final report next week. okay. [speaker not understood] is here, so why don't we go to the department of elections. >> good afternoon, john ayers, department of elections. the overview of our ballot -- our budget is pretty consistent from fiscal year to fiscal year. really, the primary driver in a number of electionses will have in a fiscal year, you'll see in 14-15, the budget remains about the same even though it's a one-election fiscal year. the reason for that is we have -- we're asking for $2.5 million to remain on reserve for the department to use to identify and build out and pay any additional lease costs for new warehouse sites. we've been looking for about a year. we haven't identified it yet. that's why the costs are moving from the current fiscal year into the next fiscal year. then in 15-16 the elections will be held more by ballot cards, [speaker not understood] so the costs are a bit higher in 15-16 w

mr. rose, can we get your report. >> on page 77 of our report, our recommended reductions to the proposed budget totalled -- of that amount, 585, 859 are savings and the other is one time savings. this would allow an increase of $3,239 or 7.2 percent in the department -- our total is 639, 963 in 15-16 and of that amount, 574 are ongoing savings. these reductions would allow an increase of $4 million. or 2.3 percent in the department 15-16 budget. we're work with the sheriff and we'll report back to the committee next week. >> okay. thank you. supervisor breed. >> i do have a question. sheriff, do you -- can you tell me what's happened since last year. i know there was a need for mental health services before the ma population and the jail, and can you explain to me what has changed because it doesn't appear to be something you're asking for for this fiscal year. >> i was going for more because i feel this is a population that merits more attention than i think the city is giving them. and we r

mr. rose's presentation. >> yes, mr. chairman and

mr. rose... >> mr. chairman and members of the committee, supervisor avalos, i don't believe that we have a recommended reduction in our report. and that you are referring to. >> okay. >> thank you. >> and just, if i could, supervisor avalos, what came out of also an audit that i and the mayor had called for, about sfgeneral and

mr. rose... >> mr. chairman and members of the committee, supervisor avalos, i don't believe that we have a recommended reduction in our report. and that you are referring to. >> okay.

i want to thank mr. rose, [speaker not understood] for their assistance in helping preserve what needs to be preserved to find any efficiencies we can find. [speaker not understood] i'll just do a very brief overview, kind of highlight the key areas in which we've seen some increases in our budget. first as you know, our mission is to recruit and engage the workforce for san francisco to meet the expectations and service needs of san franciscans. we have a number of requirements, boat charter and otherwise, that we fulfill in doing that. in this year you will see that we have a tree ducks in our labor project costs. that is because we completed our cyclical labor negotiations and that will be a relief to all of us. however, we now have on cycle a number of public safety promotional examinations and as you all know, those tend to be litigious and controversial. we have a large number of consultants and we take efforts to make sure it is all done correctly. you will also note there is an increase in our eeo bud

. >> mr. rose, again, what is the department, or the department's budget going from last year to this year in increase of how much? >> it is going up four million 465,988 or 16.8 percent and now in fairness to the department, let me be my own devil's advocate, when we made that presentation, of an increase in the department's budget, that includes salary increases and so that is some what misleading and that is not the basis of recommended cut and the basis is based on a detailed analysis of what our analyst did and as i told you before, we are very conservative and it is why, supervisors in the report that you requested that we issued today, separately, it shows huge surpluses every year. in salary surpluses. >> okay. >> we have not even scratched the surface. >> thank you mr. rose. >> supervisor avalos? >> i would like a motion to take all of the recommendations including attrition savings. >> okay. >> yeah, okay. >> we can take that without objection. >> okay. >> thank you very much. >> to our a

mr. rose's report first? >> yes, mr. chairman, and members of the committee, on page 72 of our report, our recommended reduction to the proposed budget, 267,159, 14, 15, and that amount, 112,000 one time and 154,000 are ongoing and recommended reduction, 186 in 15 1/16 all of which are ongoing savings. >> okay. thank you, mr. rose. >> colleagues, any questions, or comments. >> okay, could i have a motion to accept the budget analyst recommendations? we have a motion by supervisor breed and a second by avalos and we can take that without objection. >> thank you. >> okay. >> it has for the sheriff's department. >> >> good afternoon, supervisors, and i would like to first thank the budget analyst and the budget office of the controller and we come here to report that we agree with budget analyst report, and look forward to moving forward. >> okay. >> thank you mr. sheriff. >> colleagues, no questions? mr. rose. >> a report that i handed out this morning, i recommended reduction of the budget, 386,585 and of that amount, 258