mr. sanchez, maybe we can hear from you. halbur and some would that be to your department? >> scott sanchez, planning department. so if i understand, there would be a 90-day notification if this were to be removed? or -- president goh: it was in the third option. the second paragraph from the end. director goldstein: president goh, that looks like that is 90 days for something that comes before the board. president goh: thank you. vice president garcia: where do we stand on this? if we were vote to uphold, we are allowed to adopt language that is in the green star. i am particularly interested in number two on that, having to deal with the nsr, so how do i get there? >> it would be placing a condition that would require a four you are votes, and if you are inclined to do that, i would point out one concern is the end of the green star version, at the end of this paragraph about a 12-year moratorium, not allowing the parties -- and the release modification. if he was willingly consented to that, that would be all right, but that seems like something that would deprive the be

mr. sanchez. likes thanks. -- >> thanks. there are two permits that are at issue. one was issued in may, and the other was issued in june. we issued a suspension letter, and it was brought to our attention they did not receive the review, so we suspended the permits in july of 2010. we spent the following months working to review those permits but also to look good ways to make other modifications to improve the facades and come into compliance with the permit. they demonstrated an attempt to work once the department -- to work with the department. they filed of permits to deal with the stock issues. we released the suspension on january 10, 2011. there were language issues, so we've issued a revised letter on january 25. we had a hearing several months ago. i must apologize, because i failed to provide that to the board, and i apologize. now i do have a partial printouts. when i region one thing i apologize is just we of the appellants to submit a list of outstanding issues he had. also, the perm

mr. sanchez to his program that had accepted him. he was processed in. that was around 7:00 in the evening. at 3:00 a.m. the next morning, joseph sanchez walked away from the program. he was apprehended at a convenience store just down the road from the prison. >> the story was that somehow joe had made his way back to the gas station which was just down the road from the prison and the halfway house was a distance. it was a drive from the prison. so somehow he had gotten back to the area. an off-duty officer had stopped there to get some gas. joe didn't recognize him, but the officer recognized joe, and joe was picked up and taken into custody. to me joe is a cautionary tale about our prison system. a lot of these guys will get out, and if they don't have the skills to stay out successfully, more problems will occur. >> coming up -- >> after the stabbing occurred, my brother-in-law asked, he said do we have an axe. >> a bizarre family murder plot sends a teenager to prison. >> i was in my senior here of high school when i got locked up. >> 26 years later

mr. sanchez.sk they cancel the proceedings against him. i think that's the best way to tell south carolina that you cannot enforce immigration policy. that's the federal government. and stop profiling people because that's all that's happening. he was driving without a license. he was latino. he doesn't have any documentation. so, he was held for five days before he was handed over to i.c.e. i think they should stop any proceedings against him and i'm going to accompany him tomorrow because otherwise this piece of paper and this document of the obama administration really doesn't have any weight or meaning. >> do you see any daylight on the republican side and the fact that newt gingrich at least talked about not a pathway to citizenship, he says, not amnesty, but some sanction, some ability for long-time residence to stay, to find a way to, quote, legality, whatever that means. >> yeah. you know, look, i think mr. newt gingrich's statements are a step in the right direction. they're very differen

mr. sanchez, i think this is very low hanging fruit. i am a neighborhood activist and i do policy work for a living and the policy work that comes before you often has something to do with how much people know what is going on and when they know it and whether they know it at the right time to have some kind of substantive involvement. the first psychological reaction is to assume the worst. there is a planning around the seat with determination. i heard a briefing on the sustainability fee which will lead to more exemptions. as we change how we do business on developing policy, we need to think about how people can be informed, engage, and where that makes them feel as though they are part of the progress and not impacted by it. think you. >> these lead right to mine. i was at the original hearing when d.c. "was implemented -- wendwhen the seqa was implement. there was a uniform process figured out for how notice was given. we to notices differently from the state. the rudimentary state and federal processes are not what we use in san

mr. sanchez. the concerns i had, he has allayed. i think we should move forward with this legislation. we are ready to go. president chiu: roll-call vote on this item. supervisor farrell: aye. supervisor kim: aye. supervisor mar: aye. supervisor mirkarimi: aye. supervisor weiner: aye. supervisor avalos: aye. supervisor campos: aye. president chiu: aye. supervisor chu: aye. supervisor cohen: aye. supervisor elsbernd: aye. >> mr. president, we have 11 aye. president chiu: i have been reminded with item 15 that after the vote on the motion to continue, the chair did not state that item 15 will be continued to november 15. with that, that is what will happen with item 15. we can move to items 17, 18, and 19. >> item 17 amends the administrative code to adopt the binding financial policy providing that selected non- recurring revenues may only be spent on nonrecurring expenditures. item 18, he adopts the certificates of participation and commercial paper. item 19 updates budget rock -- budget procedures to accommodate two year budget cycles and five- year financial planning requirements and

mr. sanchez's comment was leading me to believe that you would go back and say that the board of appeals had not said anything, so i wanted to make it clear that there was plenty to say about those things. the changes to article 10 and 11. it was my understanding that you were coming here, that this was an informational, and that is how i am taking it. >> sure. understood. vice president garcia: one thing that struck me when i was reading this, and maybe turn to page eight, because it is kind of convoluted and hard for me to follow what my thought was, but it seems as though this legislation is going to ask for a cu, that a cu be obtained in order to change something having to do with parking and conform to standards necessary or desirable, and there is already a 309 review, and what i do not understand is why not as a bill that into the 309 review? because even though it is more expensive to the developer, a book is also going to be more expensive to the city, -- it is also going to be more expensive to the city. we do not want to does incentivize you for doing that, but it seems that -

leaks founder julian assange loses his appeal against extradition to sweden for legit sex crimes mr sanchez condemned the european arrest warrant system for preventing british judges from considering the legal merit of the charges his defense team argued the case is politically motivated and could see the whistleblower extradited to the u.s. after we get weeks made public thousands of confidential military and diplomatic cables and world leaders that gather in france for the g. twenty summit as a greek referendum on a bailout take center stage germany and france have announced that there will be no cash reference until it decides its own path and the surprise move by the greek prime minister lead to chaos on the world stock markets.

mrs. sanchez. does the mellow out -- the mellow act apply to this? it has to do with whether or not 8 jurisdiction can issue bonds -- the mellow routh act. this one has to do with the housing on the coast of california having to be affordable. >> i believe that is correct. i do not believe that those particular properties are within the coastal zone. only a portion of san francisco is within the coastal zone. usually, that is noted with in the conditions of our approval and at times, the coastal commission has jurisdiction or certain jurisdiction triet as far as i am aware from the record, i do not believe it is in the coastal zone. vice president garcia: just a curiosity. thank you. >> i guess i will start. it is unnecessarily not germane to my discussion, but the timing is interesting. there are tax consequences and condo consequences. that relate to the fact that it is rental housing and sold as condos. in the thing for me is, as one of the few non-attorneys on the board, both briefs were extremely legal. it is not for me to understand the nuances

mr. sanchez has no report. >> item 8 -- the historic preservation commissioner said. >> i'm here to report on this week's activities of the board of supervisors. eric m. going to tell you today was items from the full board meeting on tuesday. first would allow up all sales in bowling alleys and a specially subdistrict introduced by supervisor kim. this recommends the board of supervisors amend the ordinance with one substantive modification -- it should allow another exception for single screen movie theaters. at the committee hearing a week ago, supervisor kim amended the ordinance to include your modifications. the full board passed the modifications on first reading. supervisor weaner noted his desire to repeal the existing are you be in its retire -- in its entirety. -- existing rud. supervisor kim stated she would pursue additional outreach to allow this sort of change in the future. second, the board heard an ordinance that would alter their requirements for rebuilding non- conforming usage and structures destroyed by acts of god or calamity's. this commission recommended the board

mr. sanchez, could you shed some light on these issues? >> i think we have a picture of what the existing conditions look like. if i could have the overhead please. that is the subject property. this is the adjacent. this is the walled that is my understanding that the per matter should have had a stucco finish. i don't know how one would remove the work that has been done without going on the appellant's property. that has helped me understand better. it is within the downtown residential zoning district that allows 100% lot coverage. the north side of guy place. this fronts the south side. they would be allowed 100% coverage. i do not see the issue of placing decks and allowing a fire wall. we have not seen a building permit that allows for that. >> thank you. >> i am almost afraid to say, but the matter is submitted. >> comments, commissioners? >> we worked our way through the hyperbole, you would think that there would be a basis for some kind of settlement. it is difficult for me to think of a small deck and a stair surcharge against

comes to the constant surveillance by both private and public actors and discuss this with mr lee and sanchez a research fellow at the cato institute joined thanks so much for being here tonight i was going to be so i'm curious as to what is it you think of some of these arguments in terms of well if you're driving in your car then you're in a public space and you know you don't have any reasonable right to privacy and it's just like the cops telling you if you buy that i mean no i don't think that's a fair analogy don't obviously but this is very different this is a technology that allows monitoring on a scale as the appeals court that originally ruled this you can strip search and it really wouldn't be feasible i mean it's expensive to have numerous cars someone over time and you have to keep swapping cars in and out to make sure you don't lose them to make sure it's not obvious the same cars following a person and it certainly. for any police department anywhere in the world to follow hundreds or thousands of people at the same time when you talk about the advanced methods of the apology.