i run upstairs clutching my pistol i shoot him and say to mr shoulder and then assess the debate with the door unless. he yes any policeman behind me takes his rifle and there's some files a wonderful scene in it but when i'm here right at the time the bullet goes in here and exits the. cylinders and he suddenly throws himself through the window. just. i jumped out too which was difficult because back then the windows were much higher. so i moved forward take the gun away from him. and then i take the radio and call my bosses and shout. don't live colombia i'm what is dead. within thirty minutes or one thousand men of the special unit have arrived on the scene the whole city appears to congregate at the house and at the news of staff some up lord others are in tears. his face hit the american agent steven murphy makes his way through the crowds of soldiers he wasn't about to let the culmination of sixteen months work go by on recognized everybody is very happy everybody's very exhausted. you just can't imagine the pressure that we felt had been lifted off our shoulders. much less how

mr. akin: basically, the banking regulators are looking over the shoulders of the small banks? mr. gosar: in our own district, we have a small bank that has 39% in liquidity versus loans out. mr. akin: 39% liquidity. isn't that high? mr. gosar: that is very high, which would be normally, 8% to 10%. they had three audits in the fiscal year of 2010 and two more scheduled in the first quarter. tell me how that works and especially when we have one bureaucrat disagreeing with another. that's the disruption and fleesing of america. mr. akin: well, now, the question is, if the banker is a businessman and taking risks and wants a loan and as long as the loan is good, he makes money. if he wants to do that, why do we have a bureaucrat looking over his shoulder, particularly as long as he has a sufficient amount of liquidity to cover potential losses, why is it that the regulators are regulating every aspect of our free enterprise? mr. gosar: that's the problem with our economy at this point in time. we had a government that disrupted the understanding of the way the risk was looked at and

that referee so that this tension is not simply shouldered between labor organizations, but also on the leadership of san francisco. it is our obligation. mr. chair, i would be more than happy to call their cards before us. [applause] thank you. [applause] i am going to call a few names. joey came. calvin whelks. michelle welsh. jerry lastly. if you could just line up in the middle, i would appreciate it. >> thank you, supervisors. you pretty much summed it up. i want to reiterate, this notion that it is an anachronism, that it is unnecessary. we have over 1000 people who have used the recycling center in the last three months, who have written to the mayor. we have their addresses. 1000 people over a three-month period. the fact that we give out over $700,000 a year in buyback to folks in the kids this is a needed service. this mythology that has been voiced by some lame, suburban columnist in "the chronicle" attacking a neighborhood organization is absolutely outrageous. it is bad policy to close the center down. thank you. >> neck speaker please. -- next speaker please. >> i will try to be brief. scheherazade's calvin while. i just want

shoulder. our thoughts and our deepest condolences should be with his, friends and his colleagues. >> mr. speaker i had meetings ministerial colleagues and unconstitutional my duties with the house i shall have further duties. >> i thank the prime minister for those generous words back to private bell because his battalion is based at the colchester garrison. does the prime minister share my concern that some local authorities and some health trusts are using their perceived cuts is an excuse to make cuts thus undermining organizations and charities with a big society concert? >> i-absolutely share the honorable gentleman's concern and i think he's right to air it. in the case of the department of health, of course, there are cuts of the department of health budget, the budget is going up but it's very important that the department of health as i know my right honorable friend is doing so -- and she does everything to try and protect the very important voluntary organizations working in that department. in terms of local government, yes, there are reductions in spending as there would be,

shoulder with them. i also want to add, mr. speaker, it demonstrated the people of egypt reject the philosophy of al qaeda, reject the philosophy of extremism and use nonviolent tactics tested the world over to bring forth democracy. this is a wonderful testament to people who want freedom, justice and equality to stand together peacefully and it was so good, mr. speaker, to see people of multiple faiths, muslims, christians, other people, jews, standing together to say we want a new day in egypt. so, mr. speaker, i yield back and again, my hearty congratulations to the people of egypt. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back his time. are there any other requests for one-minutes? for what purpose does the gentlelady from texas rise? without objection, the gentlelady is given one minute. ms. jackson lee: as i was traveling, mr. speaker, to washington, i had the opportunity to read the local newspaper. it's a good time for us to reconnect with our community, those that we have not been able to see, to hear their stori

i will bring it down to georgia where folks are please to shoulder that responsibility but i thank you mrretary. >> mr. lankford. >> i want to continue this conversation on the corporate tax that as well. you mentioned early in her testimony in a conversation about territorial and you mentioned you are looking for those ideas on how we handled that and how do we reset criterion expectations on that. what country do you look at that is doing global taxation that you say it is a good model and how it is and transitional? is there another country out there that does global transaction well? >> excellent question but i don't see anything out there yet that we can said to our particular circumstances at a country. we are special in many ways. we want to keep it that way but anyway we are happy to talk to about that in more detail and we are going to look at alternatives out there. again we want like you will want we want to make sure we are not eroding the tax base of stance when we want to create more incentives to move that stuff outside the united states. >> is a general principle and follo

mr. chairman. not when you're asking struggling families to shoulder the sacrifice. giving a sweetheart deal to corporate special interests and asking the middle class to pay for it, not cool at all. the republican continuing resolution and no jobs agenda is bad for america, totally uncool. i yield back. the chair: the gentlelady yields back. for what purpose does the gentlelady from illinois rise? >> i move to strike the last word. the chair: the gentleman is -- the gentlelady is recognized for five minutes. >> thank you. madam chair, i rise in support of the flake amendment and i strongly oppose the underlying republican no jobs continuing resolution. ms. schakowsky: you know, if people out there have the gnawing feeling that the rich are getting richer and that the poor are getting poorer and they're stuck in the middle and stuck getting the bill, the fact of the matter is, they're right. this bill is just another example of the republicans' true agenda which is helping out big business and the rich while sticking it to the middle class and those who aspire to it.

shoulder. our thoughts and our deepest condolences should be with his, friends and his colleagues. >> mr. speaker i had meetings ministerial colleagues and unconstitutional my duties with the house i shall have further duties. >> i thank the prime minister for those generous words back to private bell because his battalion is based at the colchester garrison. does the prime minister share my concern that some local authorities and some health trusts are using their perceived cuts is an excuse to make cuts thus undermining organizations and charities with a big society concert? >> i-absolutely share the honorable gentleman's concern and i think he's right to air it. in the case of the department of health, of course, there are cuts of the department of health budget, the budget is going up but it's very important that the department of health as i know my right honorable friend is doing so -- and she does everything to try and protect the very important voluntary organizations working in that department. in terms of local government, yes, there are reductions in spending as there would be,

mr. moran: we are the world's superpower and many of the responsibility for maintaining the status of being that superpower falls on the shoulders of our federal employees. they get a third less than what they would be getting in the private sector with the same responsibilities but we need the best and brightest from all this country to serve the american people. if we punish them by limiting their salaries and making them -- the chair: the gentleman's time has expired. mr. moran: let's not do this. the chair: the question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from california. those in favor say aye. those opposed, no. in the opinion of the chair, the noes have it. mr. issa: i ask for a recorded vote. the chair: recorded vote is requested, pursuant to clause 6, rule 18, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from california will be postponed. . for what purpose does the gentleman from oklahoma rise? >> i have an amendment 94 at the desk. the chair: the clelling. the clerk: amendment 94 printed in the congressional record offered by mr. sullivan of oklahoma. the chair: pursuant to the order of the h

mr. himes: the average investor, the mom and pops, the widows and orphans funs they're not necessarily financially sophisticate pd. need somebody looking over the shoulder of those selling them stock, selling them bonds. the institutional investors you're talking about of course in many instances are exempt from regulations by the s.e.c. they're deemed to be sophisticated so they can participate in private placements and can use 144-a or reg-d to make investments but our individual investors who are so important to the economy need somebody looking over their shoulder and protecting them from snake oil salesmen and deception and poor disclosure. ms. waters: we heard on several occasions here today the tremendous oversight responsibility given all of the capital markets that have to be monitored, that have to be regulated, what do we need to do to make the s.e.c. stronger? we've gone through this meltdown, we've gone through this crisis, the american people expect something to happen. what do they need in order to be good overseers, good cops? mr. himes: in a more complicated and sophisticated financial world, the s.e.c. must be faster, it must be more e

mr. jordan shares that deals with regulation and federal spending. i have always had a good relationship with jim jordan. he is solid. he is unaffected, unassuming, and just straight from the shoulder kind of guy. i also remember when he first came to congress and we sat in the committee together. i thought, maybe i should not tangle with this guy, he is a wrestling champion. he is a good man. we have serious differences politically. one paper over. but the point about being in washington is that you should not base their friendships on whether or not you agree with some and ideologically. it is about the person. we have serious debates at the subcommittee level, but i am proud to be his friend. as far as governor kasich, i serve with then congressman kasich in the u.s. congress. he is very strong. he's very knowledgeable. and he has made some decisions early on that i would not have made, canceling our participation in high-speed rail. i think that is a problem. but it is his call. he is the governor, and i think that ohio has some real opportunities. the thing i would be advising him on, influence great jobs, protect lake erie, that water resources, and use of the about improving

shoulder whispering in their year. host: phillip howard talking about medical malpractice proposals. you can call us at the telephone numbers. send this e-mail at journal@cspan.org or tweets at @cspanwj. mrrd, one of the things that we have heard is that according to -- instead of relying on tours, there would be a judge with special training. can you did -- to expand on that? guest: it would be like the bankruptcy court. maybe a worker's comp system. you have an administrative system for you had judges but not juries, the judges would have funding to hire neutral experts, so that you would not have hired guns. at the end of the case, we think most cases would give results of a lot sooner. but at the end of the trial, there would be written rulings on standards of care. the idea would be to achieve consistent guidelines on what is good care and what is not, so that doctors can count on consistency. the current system, doctors, on the same setbacks, one doctor would be liable with a different jury, and the next day, another would not. that is what leads that the year in doctors. they realize that the current system -- feeds the fear in doctors. they realize the current system does not eve