what's new more is just out in the piece and mr slope and resolder slot says give it not say give easy a sort of just thought people. will sort of get a. small fortune in the beginning do you want the fortune body of the bill of about the. same years then you missed. the blessing or as we passed and i get you sure most of them will and i challenge. you don't abandon the area. that. storming apple they had stashed yet what the g.d. it was a smart kid who. he had the money on a stall and not all of what at that so must. cut or here and you get specially a brain no i had done the molecular snag that idea last in norway epstein or is that the will of a night. what it's about there you more with. than yes. and a nice fish we have a life here in mind you have a laugh he. in . my youth. who are. here. for you. i'm. sure a. lot of. what. you. learn. in. your. bob. said that i nobody thought these dogs. needed is the odd million. i don't know no i don't know. what politicians to do something to. put themselves on the line to get accepted or rejected. so when you want to be president or injury.

mr. cooperman was talking about. he used the word slope we talk about velocity and that is a make issue i think the speed at which some of these things are moving are what give people a lot of concern. and that's when they pull back i'll say it again, guys on twitter are saying hey, look, you only bring up the algorithms when it's going down they work on the upside as well. let's remember there was an uptick rule at one time. that lee brought up yesterday as well, lee cooperman. he talked about the uptick rule. it was in place for a long period of time it was removed since then it's given the computers that much more of an edge >> it's worth noting since they got rid of the uptick rule the markets have done pretty darn good >> keepen eye on the velocity of moves to the down side along with volumes to the down side and i think you're going to look at that picture and say this does have a lot to do with the algorithms and the fact that when you don't have the uptick rule in place that opens that up. >> i want to address what's happening in t

mr. sanchez granted a variance. he tries to deny it tonight by saying it has a greater slope. i think you should ask him about that. he also explained to you that that building had an a-framed top floor, and that we don't, and that they were making a full floor out of that a-framed attic. well, pardon me, but so what? that building didn't have a third floor. it got a third floor it didn't have through a variance. we're asking for a third floor. no detriment to neighbors, that's the other criteria. well, i think you should look at the bernal heights design review board. they didn't find a detriment to neighbors. what they said is please discuss further with your neighbor next door, and we're talking about roland, who spoke tonight, roland courtney bishop, and they says please visualize for him the effect you'll have on his property, and we have. you'll see something in a few minutes if you wanted to that helps that even more. thank you very much. >> thank you. >> i've got a question for either counsel or their architect. so one neighbor indicates that there's been great clarity

slope. we need to obey the law as written. would you have accepted that family? mr. stefanowski: i'm not familiar with the circumstances, but my governor -- my gut would be yes. we have people as we speak holed up in churches right now. what side of the fence would you be on, for people scared about being deported? err onont: i would the side of being generous. these are people who are fleeing abusing the people system, they are fleeing for their lives. inse poor folks, they guy the church in new haven, hasn't been able to see his child and quite sometime, a hispanic individual fearful that he is going to be deported. this is a state that is welcoming. we honor the rule of law in a state that is welcoming. >> everybody in this country is entitled to protection, so ensuring there is adequate legal protection for anyone in a deportation matter is critical. this issue of being humane is at the heart of this state. i understand we have to cooperate with the federal government, but the notion that people are treated humanely and have the protection of law to me are the ke

mrs. ramirez, dr. ford, they're giving 20 to 25 witnesses that they want to be interviewed as well. that's where that slippery slopeit needed to be tight in scope so that it didn't just continue to grow legs. >> neil: thanks, chad. very much. appreciate your patience with the questioning here. just want to know how it works. all right. thank you. so it's out there right now. you'd think this would be broiling, which it is. and think it would be roiling wall street, which it is not. concerns of the political class have no concerns on the investor class. in the u.s. it's america's most popular street name. but allstate agents know that's where the similarity stops. if you're on park street in reno, nevada, the high winds of the washoe zephyr could damage your siding. and that's very different than living on park ave in sheboygan, wisconsin, where ice dams could cause water damage. but no matter what park you live on, one of 10,000 local allstate agents knows yours. now that you know the truth, are you in good hands? >> neil: i know everyone and his uncle following these heated political debates. for my money, this wa

mr. cordoba. >> happy to present item 8 on the ybi west side bridges seismic retrofit project. i want to give a refresher course on the project itself. it sits on the western slope of yerba buena island. there are five bridges -- actually a total of eight bridges there all seismically deficient. there's some urgency involved. cost approximately $55 million right now. it's funded primarily with federal highway bridge program seismic retrofit funds, as well as proposition 1-b seismic retrofit funds with some local match. we are at an environmental completion phase. we performed approximately 30% of the preliminary engineering. our intent is to start construction in about 16 months from now. very unique features on the project. there's some landslides in the area. steep terrain. limited access above the bay, etc.. i gave a presentation back earlier this year related to the challenges here and i appreciate the approval that you gave me to go ahead and move forward with the evaluation for a c.m.g.c. contract. we went ahead now and issued an r.f.q. in july of 2018. happy to announce we had six basically proposers who submitted for the project so there's a lot of inter

mr. polis: the state took a step forward with governor hickenlooper's efforts to convene for our water plant. first as a matter of principle, representing the western slopeommunities, i will oppose any transmountain diversions without agreement from western colorado. i support water storage is an overall solution that includes conservation, both best practices and suburban and urban areas as well as those -- making sure we have better incentives for farmers to profit from conserving water. i think we all need to work together to fund the money we need to ensure we have the water infrastructure not just where our state is today, but where our state will be in 10 years and 20 years. to support not just our agricultural heritage, but the livelihood of many small family farmers as well as our growing metropolitan areas. >> mr. stapleton? mr. stapleton: colorado's water future is the lifeblood that all of us want to have. we need to put our water plans first. i fully support funding the colorado water plant. it will cost approximately $100 million per year and i will prioritize it as a budget item that we will absolutely focus on during my time as governor. t

mr. griebel: i don't have a fundamental disagreement with either ned's or bob's issues. i would want to understand the legal safeguards. there is always a concern about the shipary slope. i think the idea of understanding more than i've had an in depth conversation on but the concept of letting individuals rather than government make decisions i am generally supportive of. > thank you, m lamont? mr. lamont: i just think it is a good discussion to be having here because it tells you sort of a little bit about the role of government and how we think about it and how we treat the family and how we treat individual rights. i'm proud to be able to take that discussion a step further. i want to talk to folks in the religious community. i want to talk to folks in the faith community. i think there is a lot i can learn but i think you know where my instincts are on this. >> thank you so much. next question mr. delong starting with mr. stefanowski. >> thank you. earlier this evening mr. stefanowski you touched on unfunded mandates on municipal governments. to date there are currently over 1400 unfunded mandates on towns and cities. what i would like to know is, first off, would

slope. if you want to change the law, we can change that but for the time being we need to obey the , law as written. >> would you have accepted that family? mr. stefanowski: i'm not familiar with the circumstances, but my gut would be yes. moderator: we are talking about refugees here legally. people here illegally we have , people as we speak holed up in churches right now. what side of the fence would you of people scared about being deported? mr. lamont: i would err on the side of being generous. these are people who are fleeing persecution, they are fleeing warfare. this is what not people abusing our country has meant all along. the system, they are fleeing for their lives. i would be welcoming. these poor folks, they guy in the church in new haven, hasn't been able to see his child and in quite some time right now. a hispanic individual fearful that he is going to be deported. i think this is a state that is welcoming. we honor the rule of law in a but a state that is welcoming. >> i would repeat what i said a minute ago. everybody in this country is entitled to protection under the rule of law. ensuring there is adequate legal protect