and mr swarts did a job of pointing out the two big impediments which is an inability to bank becausef the schedule one status. >> like a good lawyer, i am sure you talk con law. does the united states live with a long-term disagreement between the states and federal government when it comes to something like this, and it involves revenue, tax collection and bank chartering. can that go on for a long time. >> your guess is as good as mine. no one knows what will happen in 2016. i'm confident there won't be a change on the federal level. if someone like hillary clinton gets the presidency, he made it clear that more research needs to be done. the one example to which we can look in this country is alcohol. and that actually ended up, as we know, manifesting in an amendment to the constitution that regulation law falls to the state. if alcohol proibition tells us anything, marijuana is following that trajectory. i don't know how long a struggle will go on. soon. >> you can go to a score in washington and be in idaho in a few minutes. you can go to a marijuana dispensary in colorado, and