that's not as to the -- mrs. watson coleman: would you agree that this is -- this foundation, this trump foundation is worthy of congressional oversight? mr. hackney: i believe the entire nonprofit sector is worthy of oversight. i would -- mrs. watson coleman: that would include this foundation. mr. hackney: absolutely. mrs. watson coleman: professionor, on june 15 you wrote an op-ed in "the new york times" about the trump foundation. in that that piece you wrote, and i quote, an a former attorney for the chief counsel of the i.r.s. who specialized in nonprofit organizations, i believe mr. trump is also criminally liable for his actions. if i were still at the i.r.s., based on the lawsuit, i would take a criminal -- i would make a criminal referral and charge him with tax evasion or false statements on a tax return or both. why specifically do you believe mr. trump is criminally liable for his actions regarding the trump foundation and how serious do you consider the crimes of tax evasion or making false statements on t

director of the middle east and north africa division of human rights watch mr watson it's good to talk to you thank you very much for granting us some time. now i know you've been trying to raise awareness of the conflict in yemen for quite some time but it's long been a bit of an orphan war overshadowed by everything else going on in the region is that finally changing now is the warning to yemen finally getting the attention it deserves it certainly seems like it in the recent congressional review resolutions are an indication that the u.s. congress is finally focusing on the war and yemen and america's role in the war and yemen and with the attention that it deserves so i do think there will be a change come january with the congress now controlled by the democrats how do you explain this sudden interest in that conflict has been really a confluence of disasters for quite some time i think the united nations declared to be the worst humanitarian disaster a year or maybe even two years ago why all the attention now well i think it's a combination of factors really a sort of perfect s

mr. watson: all right, good afternoon. how is everyone doing? great couple of days. just remarkable. pete, i want to thank you for doing a wonderful job of introducing the sessions. let's give heat a round of applause for doing a wonderful job. around ofet pete applause. [applause] mr. watson: we always aim to finish on a strong note, and this year will be no different. dr. andrew will have roberts closing the discussion with his new winston churchill biography, but dr. gerhard weinberg is affectionately referred to around these parts as the dean of world war ii historians, and i know his books are well known to all of you, and frankly, his books are well known to anyone who considers a serious world war ii scholar. this museum has been so fortunate, going back to almost the very beginning, to have part of ourn intel programs. in 2006, nick mueller, my predecessor to my left, had the group calledate a the presidential counselors. -- to have gerhard as an integral heart of our programs. guided our educational programs and this conference and the first convener of the group is someone

mr. watson: we always aim to finish on a strong note, and this year will be no different. dr. andrew will have roberts closing the discussion with his new winston churchill biography, but dr. gerhard weinberg is affectionately referred to around these parts as the dean of world war ii historians, and i know his books are well known to all of you, and frankly, his books are well known to anyone who considers a serious world war ii scholar. this museum has been so fortunate, going back to almost the very beginning, to have part of ourn intel programs. in 2006, nick mueller, my predecessor to my left, had the group calledate a the presidential counselors. -- to have gerhard as an integral heart of our programs. guided our educational programs and this conference and the first convener of the group is someone you are about to hear from, and that was gerhard. gerhard has obviously been a big part of this conference. he has been on the conference planning committee since the beginning. he has spoken at 10 of the 11 international conferences on world war ii. his accomplishments are s

our wits and executive director of the middle east and north africa division of human rights watch mr watsonit's good to talk to you thank you very much for granting us some time. now i know you've been trying to raise awareness of the conflict in yemen for quite some time but it's long been a bit of an orphan war overshadowed by everything else going on in the region is that finally changing now.

sarah whitson executive director of the middle east and north africa division of human rights watch mr watsonit's good to talk to you thank you very much for granting us some time. now i know you've been trying to raise awareness of the conflict in yemen for quite some time but it's long been a bit of an orphan war overshadowed by everything else going on in the region is that finally changing now is the warning to yemen finally getting the attention it deserves it certainly seems like it in the recent congressional review resolutions are an indication that the u.s. congress is finally focusing on the war and yemen and america's role in the war in yemen and with the attention that it deserves so i do think there will be a change come january with the congress now controlled by the democrats how do you explain this sudden interest conflict has been really a coup.

mr watson you're just compared to russia conduct in syria today american conduct in in in yemen but from what i know there is no real mass evacuations of travel forces in yemen there's barely any peace talks in yemen there and it barely any talks about the political transition. don't you think that those efforts that were undertaken by this country deserve a bit of a recognition because you know it's very easy to say that this country has no military solution but i think it's also very difficult to negotiate with have child parties who would not negotiate as a matter of principle no. no i don't think russia deserves more credit because what it deserves negative credit for is far far greater ultimately the most valuable thing in the world is human life and the reckless indiscriminate bombardment including use of chemical weapons over thirty. chemical attacks using chlorine that we ourselves have documented hundreds of thousands of barrel bombs dropped throughout the country these are grave crimes that russia has aided and abetted. throughout syria for many numbers of years and as of cours

mrs watson —— this is what police are suggesting now. watson —— this is what police are suggesting now. if you are flying and know you are having this effect, it has to be deliberate, doesn't it? you can get around those restrictions. drones have geo— fencing built in, where they can detect if it is going into a band area and can force itself to learn. you could use a signaljam at stop whoever is controlling the drone being able to communicate from their remote control with the drug, but maybe they are not using a remote control. you could be based far—away and using a drone flying along a set path, nipping it out to the airport and sending it back for a battery top up. if you are doing that, a signal jammer won't a battery top up. if you are doing that, a signaljammer won't help. a battery top up. if you are doing that, a signaljammer won't helpm is worrying to see how easy it is to cause a huge amount of disruption if you want to with something very simple. what are the ways of the authorities preventing people doing this? at the more

our wits and executive director of the middle east and north africa division of human rights watch mr watson it's good to talk to you thank you very much for granting.

mr. watson: all right, good afternoon. how is everyone doing? great couple of

mr. watson coleman for her line of questioning. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i want to think the witnesses for being here today. i want to start by saying how disappointed i am that i even sitting here today on this issue. last congress i sit on this select investigative panel that was mentioned by my former colleague that wasted $1.5 million in taxpayer money on a witchhunt that attacked women's health and tried to intimidate doctors out of giving care. this is yet another callous attempt to obstruct women's access to proper care and to impede life-saving research. i like to focus my questions on how the use of fetal tissue is contributing to the fight against hiv/aids. earlier this month as we commemorated national aids today, we mourn the loss of family and friends and community members who are facing and your past at the hands of this terrible disease. according to the centers for disease control and prevention, in 2016, just shy of 40,000 people received an hiv diagnosis in the united states. despite progress made in recent years, hiv/aids remains one of

mr. watson coleman for five minutes. >> thank you mr. chairman. mr. hackney let me ask you something very quickly. before your position what were your various jobs? >> i worked for the conservative non-profits. >> have you ever worked for the government? >> the government, no. >> have ever worked for a republican elected official? >> know. i've always worked for non-profits. >> thank you. today we are holding this hearing again. there's another hearing in a multiyear investigation of the clinton foundation completely unsubstantial allegations but at the same time we refuse to do anything to investigate serious allegations from the top administration foundation. last month that a a state judge and eric ruled that prosecutors could push legal action against the trump foundation for allegations focusing on and i quote the misuse of charitable assets and self dealings" mag. let me read from the judge's ruling. quote petitioners also -- the petitioner also alleges that charitable assets primarily consisting of money donated by outside sources were used to

mr. presley watson child. you want to put a price tag on justice? have at it. i don't.ouisiana --d in they don't have parents anymore. took care ofkins that. .e should have been in jail i just want to implore my colleagues in the senate to please think about more than criminals and the money. of thebout the lives victims as well because they are supposed to count, too. host: john kennedy, republican of louisiana. more reaction from other members of the senate, including kirsten gillibrand sang the first step act is just that, a first step toward criminal justice reform. i am calling on justice -- congress to take it a step further. deeply discriminatory cash bail system. that was our tweets from earlier. what changes do you think are needed in the criminal justice system? phone lines for those who have experience in the system and all others. jamie in maryland, go ahead. think: i wanted to say i to fix the problem, it has to be addressed from a different angle . that receive it dism is probably -- recivi is probably the biggest problem. people are being painted with bro

mr. cummings, ms. watsonoleman and i would like the gentleman from massachusetts be aware i have no further speakers and i'm prepared to close. i reserve. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman reserves the balance of his time. mr. lynch: we have no further speakers on our side, mr. speaker. and i would urge my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to support this bill and i yield the rest of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. the gentleman from georgia. mr. hice: i also urge adoption of this bill and i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. the question is will the house suspend the rules and pass the bill h.r. 6893 as amended. those in favor say aye. those opposed, no. in the opinion of the chair, 2/3 being in the affirmative, the rules are suspended. the bill is passed and without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid on the table. without objection, the title is amended. the speaker pro tempore: for wh

iain watson, bbc news, westminster. and iainjoins me now. on mrss there for alternative plans in the event it fails? i think momentum is picking up and we should say first of all that was not much momentum behind her own deal because this crucial weekend behind —— before the vote, the prime minister needs people to be coming her way and they seem to be going slightly in the other direction so tonight a ministerial aide has resigned, no offence to him, not a household name even in his own household. but here is somebody at the start of his ministerial career, 35 years old and ugly voter and pretty loyal a nd 35 years old and ugly voter and pretty loyal and he is not investing his future in theresa may and there is speculation that others at that level might consider resigning as well so against that backdrop it is unsurprising that ministers are talking more openly about what should happen if on tuesday the prime minister is defeated. while the interesting things about the amber rudd intervention is this idea of our another referendum or the norway

that will give parliament a direct say in what happens if mrs may's deal is rejected by mp‘s next tuesday. our political correspondent iain watsonghting for her deal, fighting for herjob. on the second day of the brexit debate, there is a focus on security. but some mps wonder how sick us theresa may used in number 10. she will hurt today is better than yesterday when her government was defeated three times. as a result, ministers will need to announce today when they will publish legal advice on brexit that they wanted to keep confidential. and if theresa may's deal is defeated next week, mps will now have a greater say over what happens next. at least on day one of the debate, theresa may will have an uphill battle to get her weighed. debate, theresa may will have an uphill battle to get her weighedlj have uphill battle to get her weighed.” have spent nearly two years negotiating this deal. if i had banged at the table and walked out of the room and at the end of the process deliver the very same deal thatis process deliver the very same deal that is before us today, some might say that i had done a betterjob. but i didn't pla

tuesday's crucial commons vote on mrs may's brexit deal, mps must first vote — later this tuesday — on whether her government has broken parliamentary rules. iain watsonthat this motion on contempt is passed. it then isn't such a big deal because, as i say, it may lead to ultimately simply the suspension, if that, of a couple of ministers. the really big deal is still the meaningful vote in a week's time, but it is potentially embarrassing and a distraction for the prime minister when she is trying to make this deal already against the backdrop of such scepticism. and you can keep up to date with the latest developments on our website. you'll also find background analysis. that's all at bbc.com/news. stay with us on bbc news, still to come: to a rockstar‘s welcome, the former first lady michelle obama inspires londoners. it's quite clear that the worst victims of this disaster are the poor people living in the slums which have sprung up around the factory. i am feeling so helpless that the children are dying in front of me and i can't do anything. charles manson is the mystical leader of the hippie cult suspected of killing sharon tate and at least si

day comedy "holmes and watson" but they also just dropped a big clue about their next project, taking over my job. >>> hello, everyone. this is will ferrell and i'm joined by mr. kevin frazier should be here. i guess he's got bigger fish to fry. thanks, kevin, won't ever forget it. these are the questions i've always wanted to ask you. we've done a ton of movies together. how are we not sick of each other yet? >> i think because we genuinely like each other and we're careful not to outstay our welcome with each other. >> we both have demonstrative signals to each other like i've had enough. >> i can't even with you right now. okay. when you see this face, just turn around. >> will, can i go tit for tat and i ask you a question? >> what is the one question you have always wanted to ask me? >> oh, do you fancy yourself a sportsman at all? >> well, thank you for that question. that is a great answer. i just want to know what the question was. >> oh. >> so let's talk about this movies "holmes and watson." ♪ the boys are back in town why should people go see our movie? >> because it's ridiculous. >> what have you done with sherlock? >> why, watson, i never left. >

mr speaker, thank you. let's cross over to westminster now and speak to our political correspondent rob watson. on theresa may's deal before christmas. still time to go and buy the turkey and wrap presents and so on and so forth, but one wonders whether the whole idea of parliament being sobran, bile and being able to dictate the timetable of all of this, whether that is all out of the window. basically, theresa may is doing what she wants to, isn't she? i guess we will find out in the few days and weeks ahead. i was thinking asi days and weeks ahead. i was thinking as i watched the daily‘s proceedings, people satirising british politics, surely not? i wonder what gave them that idea. i do think that we did learn something about pa rliament‘s role do think that we did learn something about parliament's role in the brexit process. the first point is that theresa may might be plan and eight, the idea of delaying the vote until the middle of january eight, the idea of delaying the vote until the middle ofjanuary in the hope that mps are so terrified by the brexit ticking clock that they will suppo

watson. the suggestion the government is in contempt, on the face of it, they caught bang to rights, they come because parliament last month voted for full disclosure on the details surrounding mrsral did not give full details today, he gave a summary. that is right, and it seems to have united the opposition parties. he gave what he called a legal commentary and argued strongly it was not in the national interest to give the full legal advice, he said that would breach of parliamentary convention and set a damaging precedent. and you then started to downplay a bit the legal advice he had given to the cabinet and said, it is not like going to war, it is not whether an action is legal or illegal, but you want to protect the convention, he said he was protecting parliament and the country. that did not cut ice with the opposition parties. six of them including labour and also crucially, including labour and also crucially, including the dup, the party that usually props up the minority conservative governance, they have written to the speakerjohn bercow asking for urgent debate on whether the government is in contempt of parliament by not producing the full and final legal advice,

mrs may‘s brexit deal. let‘s cross now to our political correspondent — iain watson — who joins us now from westminster. into a mini pantomime season, very seasonal at this time of year. conservative mps shouting, oh, yes, he did! oh, no, he didn‘t! at the end of that exchange, he muttered whatever he muttered. he maintains he said stupid people. his detractors say he said, stupid woman. judge for yourself. i‘ve got some advice for the right honourable gentleman. look behind you. they‘re not impressed and neither is the country! jeremy corbyn saying stupid people, in his words, the other side of the house of commons suggesting he said, stupid woman. you make think that is the end of it. no, not a bit of it. the business of the house of commons this afternoon was effectively in meltdown. former foreign secretary margaret beckett said it was an organised riot on the conservative benches. questions came in and points of orderfrom benches. questions came in and points of order from people like patrick mcloughlin, former conservative party chair. that was not enough for them, a few of them turned on the spea

william watson, that the report 19th century poet william watson said he can mistrust of the children of blindness. i i guess, but hate and mr. ross are also the children of good vision because there is the glory of the free press and then there are the things we must answer for. access journalism, horserace coverage, staged cable punditry and pyrotechnics, falls balance can routine anonymous sourcing, endless speculation, college relationships with sources, clickbait, gossip, bending over backwards to seem less shrill or partisan, carelessness amid breaking news. and then every now and then one of us like trudy miller gets played into helping start a war. then every now and then someone like jack kelly or stephen or janet coker jayson blair or brian williams gets caught just making shit up. and then there are the outlets that look just like a news organization but i really lie factories. the point being, while terrifying subject, is not so cut and dried. so i implore you judges to withhold judgment at least until we are to up here and also in the not unlikely event that i myself should look out something objectionable. your