what do you think? mr. shah: we are frustrated by the coverage. when we look at the president's record on issues we think the american people care about -- what is the president's policy doing to make it easier to get a job, to make it easier to provide opportunities for children, to make schools and communities safer, to protect us from foreign threats? we think his record is stellar. i have no bones about defending anything from a policy perspective this president has advocated for. that has not been a focus of the press. i don't think the public is concerned about every minute detail of controversy that discovered wall to wall on some of the outlets he mentioned. we don't get to pick and choose what folks cover. we think more focused on policy and -- focus on policy and things that would be beneficial to people's lives would be worth covering. >> based on that, how do you define fake news? mr. shah: i would say fake news, and the term can mean different things to different people -- i think it is not true, or so misleading it might as well not b

mr. zurkberg, what is facebook doing -- mr. zuckerberg, what is facebook doing to prevent foreign acters from interfering in u.s. elections? mr. zuckerberg: thank you, senator. this is one of my top priorities in 2018. to get this right. one of my greatest regrets in running the company is that we were slow in identifying the russian information operations in 2016. we expected them to do a number of more traditional cyberattacks, which we did identify and notify the campaigns that they were trying to hack into them. but we were slow in identifying the type of new information operations. ms. feinstein: when did you identify new operations? mr. zuckerberg: it was right around the time of the 2016 election itself. so since then -- 2018 is an incredibly important year for elections. not just with the u.s. midterms, but around the world there are important elections in india, in brazil and mexico and pakistan and in hungary that we want to make sure that we do everything we can to protect the integrity of those elections. now, i have

mr. o'malley: were you? what is your name? >> dan. mr. o'malley: what are you doing here? >> i direct the academic programs. if you ever want to talk to the students we'd love to have you. but studying performance management. mr. o'malley: i'd love to do that. where is sam? my guy. i'll give you my card. all right. where did you teach in baltimore? >> canton. mr. o'malley: canton. >> southerland park area. mr. o'malley: i didn't know we had two lines here. >> the older folks. back and forth. no i'm not a student at st. anselm. mr. o'malley: but you might run. you might be a new candidate. have you thought about it? >> no, i have not. >> how are you? thank you. >> thank you so much. >> thank you. >> have a good day. mr. o'malley: thank you. >> governor. >> used to be. when you call a governor senator he'll just sit on his tail and not do anything ever again. mr. o'malley: i love signing baseballs. thank you. ood meeting you. mr. o'malley: thank you. what is your name? >> my name is erin. mr. o'malley: you going to run, erin, one day? >> probably. mr. o'malley: i hope you do.

mr. rosenkranz: yes. justice gorsuch: whato you say to the critique that the void-for-vagueness doctrine, as a racial issue matter, is just substantive due process and suspect on that basis and therefore should be narrowly construed? mr. rosenkranz: your honor, it's not -- it's not substantive due process. it's a procedural due process concern and it's a separation of powers concern. it is the procedural right on the part of the individual who's being accused or being deported to know what the law is in advance. and as justice thomas has explained very eloquently, it derives out of the rule of lenity. and it's also, as your honor was pointing out, a very important separation of powers set of principles because the law enforcement officer on the ground who gets to tell a non-lpr, you are an aggravated felon and you are out, with no opportunity for bia review and very limited judicial -- opportunity for judicial review, that is a classic abdication of congressional authority to line level officers. how is it -- how is it -- just

what mr. johnson had intended with that quote was to talk about the peace table that we are willing to negotiate terms with north vietnam, but what mr. block showed was more than halfway up the vietnamese country. if you read "the washington and 1974 andn 1972 between the time the watergate scandal broke out and the time president nixon resigned, you opened the pages to see he had drawn next seven coming out of the sewer at the eisenhower administration. -- nixon coming out of the sewer at the eisenhower administration. with the exception of the shape he gave him as a newly elected president, which is now in the collection of the washington post, he never relented. he did not see a good sign to richard nixon. it doesn't mean he attacked it blindly. he had real issues from the things and the corruption and the wiretapping. things he didn't like. and to share it with others. that is the basic role of the editorial cartoon. and a good cartoonist does more than illustrate the news. he gets his poin

mr. president, what about the daca kids, should they worry about what's going to happen to them, sir? >> the democrats have really let them down. they've really let them down. they had this great opportunity. the democrats have really let them down. it's a shame. and now people are taking advantage of daca.

mr. block's work. for me what stood out in 1967 was how important it was to look out for consumers, whether they were people purchasing automobiles, or people who were smoking cigarettes, or eating tainted meat. mr. block did a series of cartoons that highlighted the work of individuals in promoting better consumer regulation, better safety for americans. so we have the food and drug administration with the pharmaceutical industry. and americans deceased from inadequate warnings. could we have drawn this cartoon today? perhaps i'll let you be the judge. mr. block had suffered a heart attack in 1959 and quit smoking. and he never gave up fighting about cigarettes after that. he hated cigarette smoking, hated what the cigarette industry was doing to people to encourage them to smoke. and so her he's showing the federal trade commission valiantly attempting to fight advertisers in order to give more controls over what they could say, more truth in advertising about what was in the products that people were smoking. t

and what mr. block is showing, while bush is denying his involvement in the scandal, the testimony of the people who were the principle players in the arms for hostages are going to ensnare him anyway. mr. block really liked to draw that president bush with rather large lips, because of course, he always was saying to people, read my lips. next, we have bill clinton. and here he's shown in a masterful attempt at tightrope walking, trying to move a budget forward, and keep the monica lewinsky scandal at bay. now, ms. lewinsky is not labeled ms. lewinsky, and that may be lost to people who look at the cartoon in the sands of time, but we know that that was his intention, and anybody who opened "the post" that day knew that's exactly what bill clinton was trying to balance. mr. block did not work long into george w. bush's presidency. he was too ill during 9/11 to do anything about that, even though apparently people were going to his hospital bedside and encouraging him and saying that they needed h

what mr. johnson had intended with that quote was to talk about the peace table, we're willing to negotiate terms of peace with north vietnam. but what mr. block shared was bombing more than halfway up the vietnamese country. if you read "the washington post" between 1972 and 1974, between the time the watergate scandal broke out and the time president nixon resigned, you opened the pages to see 174 cartoons attacking the president on watergate alone. he had drawn nixon coming out of a sewer during the eisenhower administration and with the exception of the free shape he gave him as a newly elected president, which is now in the collection of "the washington post," he never relented. he did not see a good side to richard nixon, but it doesn't mean he attacked him blindly. it meant that he had real issues with some of the things whether it be corruption or wiretapping or things that he didn't -- he just disliked. and he felt it was his job as a cartoonist to express his opinion and to share it w

. >> what happened that night? mr. deon: as far as i know, i did not know what had happened until the next day. i was in and out of the pool room and the board next door and i had been jerking pretty heavy and i come back and -- i had been drinking pretty heavy and i come back. i did -- i will go up early in the morning -- woke up early in the morning and come out of there, i had a habit of going through this lot and keller -- calling a cab. i did not know this place had been robbed until i was arrested for it. >> what did they say when you were charged? esther gideon: he don't say nothing. just listing with the state has against you. pleading not guilty. >> he insisted he committed no crime. his bail was set at $1500. he had no money. so he was kept in the county jail for two months waiting trial. he had no money for a lawyer, either and this set the stage for a great turning point in american jurisprudence. television cameras are not allowed in florida courts. but because of the historic significance of the opening co

mr. zuckerberg: congresswoman, i'm not sure what that means. rep. shoo: well, i will follow up with you on it. when did facebook learned that cambridge analytica's research project was targeted psychographic political campaign work? mr. zuckerberg: congresswoman, in my be useful to clarify what actually happened here -- rep. eshoo: i don't have time for a long answer, though. when did facebook learn that? when you learned it, did you contact their ceo immediately? if not, why not? mr. zuckerberg: congresswoman, yes, what we learned in 2015 that a temperature university researcher with an acted -- cambridge university researcher with an academic institution that built -- rep. eshoo: we know what happened with them. mr. zuckerberg: yes, i'm answering your question. when we learned about that -- rep. eshoo: in 2015 you learned about it? mr. zuckerberg: yes. rep. eshoo: you spoke to their ceo immediately? mr. zuckerberg: we shut down the app -- rep. eshoo: did you speak to the ceo immediately? mr. zuckerberg: we got in touch with him and commanded that t

mr. comey is lying essentially is what mr. mccabe is saying that comey did give him the right to go talk to the press, so this all has to be flushed out. clearly the ig believed mr. comey that comey did not give mr. mccabe the ability to go talk to the press. now as it relates to mr. comey you've got the added problem now that the memos that he wrote the seven memos that he decided to write on president trump never wrote memos on any of the other meetings that he had with the other president or the ag or anyone else prior to this, but he kept seven memos four of those were classified. he decided to lander them to a friend who then leaked them to the new york times. if those memos contain classified information, he purposely did that, he purposely leaked them in order to get a special counsel started after he was fired, he leaked pieces of these so we need to figure out exactly what is it that he leak ed. who did he give these memos to and was it just the friend that leaked them to the new york times or were there others? i bel

advent of polling in the united states of america democrats their complaint is what's the broader plan you say mission accomplished mr president what's the mission they see this as not pursuant to any particular plan and on the right it seems inconsistent with the the promises the president made during the campaign to withdraw so as a result there's just not a big constituency in favor of what he's done mission accomplished was a popular phrase that turned very notorious with iraq and look at where we are now listen i i i find it interesting you have someone on the left and someone on the right politically in america here on r t and we sort of agree the worst case scenario is assad gets toppled or killed and then we have another iraq for the next decade and then we really get engaged in a war because isis then overwhelms and takes over the country u.k. prime minister to reason may has been forced to defend the decision to join the u.s. led bombing raids against the syrian government without the approval of parliament justified the move in front of lawmakers on monday. we have published the legal basis for our action

and on trade, rupert, mr abe has not got what he wanted from mr trump, nor what he needed politicallybig problem for mr abe. he has tied himself very closely to president trump, he's invested a lot in their personal relationship. that's not very popular here injapan, mr trump is not a popularfigure here injapan. prime minister abe had no choice but to do that and, of course, was expecting some sort of payoff in return on the issue of trade, he has not got that. mr trump is playing to his domestic us constituency, he has promised that he would do something about these huge trade deficits with countries like japan and china and that is his priority. and despite this close and apparently real friendship between the two leaders, mr abe has been left out again. these tariffs against japanese steel and aluminium exports have not been dropped and that was definitely what mr abe was hoping for, and he's sort of now been drawn into discussing the possibility of a bilateral trade deal betweenjapan and the united states, and that is something that again japan absolutely does not want. it wants a

mr. cobb: what does management see is the priority? is -- mr. prince: what does management see is the priority? is that something that is low on the totem pole? mr. plante: it requires a change in mindset because it doesn't exist now. ms. nelson: picking up on your question, the last year and a half -- i don't want to say it has been funny, but it has. we have people running around trying to rediscover america. because the only people that we cared about were people in the urban centers and all those rural folks, all those folks who are just beyond the frame, we have got to go discover them now. but the truth is that there is a lot of truth to that. so figuring out how to do that, but how to do that from a place of authenticity that engages those communities and finds new storytellers and doing it in that way, to me, quite honestly, i have found that the documentaries on community have been in the vanguard in that space, much much more so than the daily news. mr. prince: was it emily, pbs has specialized in documentaries. ms. nelson: that is corr

mr. nicholson. thank you for being here. what is the investment required for auto makers to make the change to vehicles designed for high octane fuels and how much time will you need to do it? >> thank you for that question. as i said earlier, switching over all the engines to high compression ratios is going to be literally billions of dollars of investment spread across the u.s. car and other manufacturers. lead time wise, we need four years minimum and that's actually going fast when you think about making all those changes. so if we were to get legislation this year, we think we could be ready for '22 calendar year or '23 model year. that's why we have a sense of urgency trying to go as fast as we can to get the legislation. >> what do you expect the fuel mileage is going to be and what will be the cost to the consumer? >> the increase in fuel economy from the 95 ron proposal we think is 3%, which is, you know, some consumers may not notice that, as much. but it's really substantial when you think about the cathay impact. and

justice: if you hide the evidence of what you are doing, you're going to prevail? [laughter] mr. sullivan: i don't think it is hiding, the boundary lines being stated, that is what they have always done. justice kennedy: is it appropriate in this case to look at what the system -- in terms of the boundaries in the extent to which it complies with redistricting criteria? you have people from the potomac joined with people from the far west panhandle. they both have farms, but the former are hobby farms. [laughter] the others are real farms. >> the consensus is that most of the people in that western maryland part of the state actually live in urban areas, according to the census. but the congress abandoned the geographic requirements as early as 1911, the last time they put contiguity and compactment into it. justice: it seems to me they are worried about going over chesapeake bay and drying it district, and that makes sense. but it is not just water that separates people. part of the objection here in the way it was written, it doesn't seem to have any internal logic. mr. sullivan

mrs. bush: i did. >> what would be your advice for the first husband? mrs. bush: the same thing i would give the first wife. be yourself. i had trouble with that. i would say be yourself. and take advantage of these opportunities. i had lunches for deformed children, arthritis, cancer, nobody paid attention except in the hometown where the doctor came from or the sick child. then you got great publicity. that is where it counts. who cares what -- sorry -- broadcasts say, or something. people are what you should care about. >> what should people know about the first lady that we don't know? mrs. bush: i don't know. it seems to me i know everything about the first lady. the first thing a first lady should know is she was not elected president. nor was i. you should know you're not an elected official. but you have an opportunity to do a lot of good things. you should take that opportunity. >> in your book, you write i am not sure the american public likes the spouse to be front and center. mrs. bush: well, i think that is probably true. we did not elect her. i

what are we planning to do in the northern border? as mr. katko said, 95% of that border is essentially open. so any thoughts about where we're going in terms of protecting our northern border? secretary nielsen: yes. as i mentioned, i was speaking what are we planning to do in with my colleague in canada about this. so part of it is the partnership on both sides to make sure that we facilitate legal trade and travel, but that we reduce any illicit activity, including drugs. opioids continue to be a problem throughout the nation. mr. correa: what kind of partnership does we have right now with people north and south of the border? secretary nielsen: they're strong, very strong with the canadians, yes, sir. mr. correa: how about the mexicans? secretary nielsen: we have a strong partnership with the mexicans as well. mr. correa: general kelly, who was in your position here a few months back, made some comments and i agree with him, to the fact that if anything gets near our border, we've essentially lost a battle. if we want to stop terrorists

to do and what does the robot do? mr. rosenkrantz: a human being sends the robot instructions. by the way, the computer scientists in the brief spell this out in detail. what happens then? it interfaces with the hardware computer in a hardware facility. it spins a disk and looks for the email on that disc after verifying certain protocols. physical manifestations on magnets of the ones and zeros and then it copies them onto another disk. it then safeguards them and sends them back here. sat at a computer in washington, d.c., and hacked into our servers in ireland. everyone agrees that would be a search and seizure in ireland. what mr.vernment did pushed aside the operator in redmond, that search would be in ireland. now is the happening government is requiring us to do something. >> do you dispute that the government could issue a warrant to do that in redmond? mr. rosenkrantz: the government could issue a warrant. justice gorsuch: do the search in redmond? could the government do something outside of the stored communicat

the aftermath of this deadly crash t w correspondent helen humphrey joins us now from the city of mr what's the latest you've been hearing from kareen about the suspect. a full story released also the latest we've heard from police about the suspect is that he acted alone the police have also said late last night that they ruled out the possibility of an islamist link to this attack that said today they maintained because they are pursuing the avenues in their investigation in order to assess whether the motive was a suicide or a murder suicide and attack to kill other people which sadly also killed two people here in the mediæval center minster now raids on his house according to reports have found a k forty seven which is no longer in working order the investigation looking also into the vehicle which was previously here behind me that was used in this attack that was weaponized also found. like device so fireworks which had been linked to two cables as well we've just heard from the interior minister horst see who for who has been here who's paid his respects let's take a listen to what

you can track what people buy, correct? mr. zuckerberg: congresswoman, -- rep. castor: you are collecting that data, what people purchase? it has a share button. facebook has the application and you patented applications to do just that, isn't that correct? mr. zuckerberg: i do not think any button shares transaction data. rep. castor: you are tracking -- collecting data on people that are on the internet, whether facebook users or not, right? mr. zuckerberg: yes, we collected data for security reasons. rep. castor: you watch where we go. the senator have a funny question yesterday about where you are staying at did you not -- you did not want to share that but facebook gathers the data of where we travel. mr. zuckerberg: everyone has control. rep. castor: would you acknowledge that yes, facebook, that is the business you are in, gathering data? mr. zuckerberg: i disagree with that characterization. rep. castor: you are saying you do not gather data on where people travel based upon their internet and the way they sign in? mr. zuckerberg: the primary way facebook

mr. keating: those are good things. secretary nielsen: that's what those programs do, they help local communities and first responders to respond. mr. keating: these are tried and tested. those things i mentioned all save lives. with a culture of preparedness with emerging threats, how is that greater? how are we safer with that? ose are critical moneys to police, fire, that they cannot do on their own and includes regional kind of preparedness. i leave it with that. i'm concerned. i think i am not alone on this committee on both sides of the aisle in terms of that concern because we have seen the effectiveness. if i could shift very quickly one other area. president trump in his private life, even though he's president he continues in his private life and private business life to take advantage of h-2-b visas for his personal visa. they are there for him. they are not there for everyone right now because there's a demand. i represent a seasonal area where small businesses really rely on this. under the bush administration, they nearly raised the cap

mr. powell: what i said to the president before that was, mr.sident, you need to understand if you take out this government, you become responsible as the new government. you become responsible for 27 million iraqis who will be standing there looking at us. you take on great responsibility and be sure you understand that and want to do it. and we were private when we were having this conversation. he said, well, what's the alternative? i said the alternative is to have the u.n. be in the first position. they're the ones who have violated, whose resolutions have been violated. so let's have a diplomatic approach. david: president bush said i agree with your idea of going to the u.n. and convincing them. mr. powell: he did. before taking military action he wanted to publicly present our case to the united nations. so on a thursday afternoon i was with him. he said would you take the case next tuesday? david: to the u.n. mr. powell: yeah. david: you made the case saddam did have or we thought he had weapons of mass destruction when it turned out he

i'd like to know what risk would be involved in making that decision? mrs. score the octane was -- and increase the use of renewable fuels. if they're no longer specified and we replace the rfs with a high octane standard set at 95-ron levels, what's the impact of overall demand for renewable fuel? >> there'd be no impact on overall demand. the 95-ron is the 95 premium fuel, currently sold on the marketplace with a 10% ethanol blend. if we move to a national standard of 91 there'd be little to no incentive to further use bio fuel in our transportation mix. >> what might this mean for the.com of advanced bio fuel? >> well, this would i vis rate the innovation taking place so far. if you look at advanced bio fuels. a few years ago when the rrk it is was put on hold, we as a nation lost billions of investments because of the lack of certainty that these fuels that i would say, contributed 90 plus greenhouse reduction. the uncertainty that there'd be no mark for them in the u.s. >> as we have discussed the department of energy and the product -- have been explori

what the people want. that is why most people are registering. >> appreciate that. mr. sure, what would your relationship be like with the white house? >> want to point something out, steve. because we had this conversation . is important that we have women's voices, the leading candidate participating in these debates, and i hope that future debates will also include her. i will work with president donald trump but i think we will disagree on most things. but i have established the ability to work with people on both sides of the aisle. one of my top priorities is the extraordinary housing crisis we have in california. adjusted for housing and transportation costs, one out of five californians live in poverty. i'm trying to work with national association of state treasurers, most of them are republicans, to try to work with congress on the cannabis policy. that demonstrates a long history and record to try to find problem-solving elected officials who are thoughtful about getting the job done. >> let's talk about the problem of high-speed rail in many people's minds. th

mr. lynch, had been disposed of. for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. shuster: i offer amendments en bloc. the chair: the clerk will designate the amendments en bloc. the clerk: en bloc number four consisting of amendments number 102, 103, 105, 106, 10 , 111, 113, and 116 printed in part a of house report number 115-650, offered by mr. shuster of pennsylvania. the chair: pursuant to house resolution 839, the gentleman from pennsylvania, mr. shuster, and the gentleman from oregon, mr. defazio, will each control 10 minutes. the chair recognizes the gentleman from pennsylvania. mr. shuster: thank you, mr. chairman. i support considering these amendments en bloc, all of which have been approved by both the majority and minority. these members put forward thoughtful amendments and i'm pleased to be able to support moving them en bloc. with that i reserve the balance of my time. the chair: the gentleman reserves. the gentleman from oregon is recognized. mr. defazio: mr. chairman, i yield mysel

emily: what would you like to see companies do about privacy? mr. pson: tech companies should respect information about me or you. emily: what does that mean? mr. thompson: they don't sell it. they don't share it. they do it in a way that is relevant to the needs of their business. any of them make money off of ads and they have to kind of use that as a leverage point. at microsoft, we don't believe in that. companies don't think about what their policy should be around this issue. there is something fundamentally broken about that. i will letn: zuckerberg explain that to you. emily: let's talk about the cloud. you said you, wanted microsoft to move faster. where would you see progress and where have you seen them and like them to continue to move? mr. thompson: part of the role of chairman of the board is to be impatient. it was about that statement of impatience, if you will. the companies made phenomenal progress. it is very well. they have a very strong presence and they are doing a lot more in this space. the first mover. that we are making a ki

i will figure out the future whenever it arrives. >> your day begins at what time and ends when? mr. shah: it never really ends until you fall asleep in bed after a phone call at midnight about whatever issue was percolating. i usually get into the office around 7:00, 7:30. >> what do your parents think about what you are doing? mr. shah: they think it is pretty cool. [laughter] it wasn't until i got this job that my mom did not want me to go to law school. she was adamant i needed to get a higher degree in something. they get calls from extended members of the family, friends -- i saw your son on tv -- i think they get a kick out of it. >> final question, when you have vacation time, how do you relax? mr. shah: i don't really relax. i kick back and watch sports. that is kind of my thing. i'm getting a little bit of the tournament in right now. >> raj shah, thanks for your time. >> c-span's washington journal, live every day with news and policy issues that impact you. coming up sunday morning, andrew klein of usa today talks about the recent piece on the future of political leaders

they have a close relationship, did mr abe get what he wa nted relationship, did mr abe get what he wantedld trump? —— mariko oi. not really, a slap in the face for prime minister abe because they have always emphasised how close friends they are, donald trump tweeted again this morning saying they played golf but japan is the only major allied to the us not getting an exemption from those ta riffs getting an exemption from those tariffs on steel and aluminium. prime minister abe talked about this ina prime minister abe talked about this in a press conference, saying japan posed no national security threat but asked by a japanese reporter whetherjapan but asked by a japanese reporter whether japan should get but asked by a japanese reporter whetherjapan should get an exemption, donald trump's answer was a nose. i would look forward to at some point in the future take them off but at the moment we have a deficit that is a minimum of $69 billion a year —— no. japan sends us millions and millions of cars and we virtually tax them not at all. we don't send so much product because we have trade

mr. chairman. the chair: the gentleman reserves. for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. shuster: i mr. shuster: thank you, mr. chairman. i do rise in opposition. this amendment would interfere with national security, homeland security, and law enforcement operations. the area serves a critical role for the country as a home to the federal government. each day military pilots and other agencies use helicopters to conduct vital missions as part of our national defense and the operations of government. these agencies include the d.o.d., coast guard, park police, capitol police and other agencies. the missions they fly cannot be accomplished with any other means and are essential to our nation's protection. this could effect the safety of our service members and law enforcement and affect the efficiency of the air space. i understand the gentleman's concern and i hope we can find some way to address them but i urge my colleagues to oppose this amendment. with that, i reserve the balance of my time. the chair:

he wants to hear. somebody who knows how to tell mr trump what he wants to heatm somebody who knows hear. it is interesting, isn't it, knowing how to handle the american president? and new deal would be a win for him. he would be seen to be making changes but as far as france, germany, the rest of europe and other nations are concerned, it would be leaving the deal in its current sense and they would be happy too. i think when you look at the details and ask questions about what exactly this with entail commit whitecap located. there's the whole question of whether the iranians would feel that if you start adding elements, around the deal, whether that means you are violating it in any way, but i think with the goal of mr macron seems to a band was shifted to tried to get the president to consider —— was just to try to get the president to consider not ending the deal. trying to come up not ending the deal. trying to come up with ways of addressing these concerns that not only mr from but also the europeans have in terms of iran's behaviour. it was an interesting way to put it it al

what happened? mr. netanyahu: man's greatest calling. david: private equity yes. mr. tanyahu: i was derailed. i was derailed into a different direction. what changed my life was that out a month after i got into b.c.g. my brother fell leading the rescue force. david: your oldest brother. he was the only israeli soldier killed. that was july 4 of 1976, right? mr. netanyahu: right. david: so you decided to go back and honor him in some way? mr. netanyahu: his death steered me ultimately into politics in an unintended way, really. but the short time that i spent in b.c.g. is the place where i really understood the fundamentals of competition and competitive advantage. and once you understand that, you know, it's like a secret that was shared, i mean, i had the opportunity to see the competitive -- the question of competition across industries and across countries. and i understood that you have to let the private sector earn, compete, succeed, and fail. that's the only way that economies grow. and that's where i got there. david: so you moved back to israel and got involv

what is a cyber war? is america under attack? mr. clapper: we are under attack right now. e russians are mounting an aggressive operation against the united states. it is going on right now. >> what should we do? mr. clapper: a lot of things. speaking about the voter apparatus, we must do everything we can to secure that. the paper ballot is back up. i thought it was a no-brainer when jeh johnson began contacting election officials. i was surprised by the pushback he got from state elections officials who said we don't need any help from you. i don't know what the solution is. what we ended up doing, we put out best practices for cyber security. that is one obvious thing we need to do. , i have come to believe this is not very popular , but the social media platforms need regulation. thingambridge analytical is illustrious of that. the 1920's, they regulated television. nothing comparable. that is something they don't want obviously but we need them. to jeopardize peoples first amendment rights. but if you buy a pack of ,igarettes, you want to smoke you get a warning that t

mr. pompeo what it ,embolden, rather than restrain president trump's most dangerous instincts." the senate foreign relations committee is meeting monday to vote on the nomination. we have live coverage at 5 p.m. eastern on c-span. connect with c-span to personalize the information you get from us. go to c-span.org/connect and sign up for the email. the program guide is a daily mail with the most updated primetime schedule and upcoming live coverage. word for word gives you the most -- video highlight. an inside look at upcoming authors and book vegetables. -- american history tv exploring our nation's past. visit c-span.org/connect and sign up today. >> monday on landmark cases, a case about student free speech. in 1965, students from des moines iowa war black armbands to protest the vietnam war, violating school policies. the students challenged the school board's free speech restriction. the resulting decision established that the students keep their first amendment rights on school grounds. our guests to discuss this case are mary beth tinker, one of the students. she was 13

two men there probably getting on very well by grooming each other the mr macro was touching mr trump's leg what is the explanation for this apparent chemistry between these two men. when i think a president like role france invested a lot of time and effort into this he chose to not mr trump maybe other leaders in europe are doing at least behind closed doors spots to give it a chance and he was trying to reach out to trump he invited him to the busty they military parade in paris last year playing of course to mr trump's known love of pomp and circumstance but he also always gave the impression that he's taking trump very seriously and also today when the two met at the white house president ma kroll several times called mr trump his friend at the same time of course you also didn't refrain from pointing out there are differences and he has to because mr trump is not so popular in france as in most european countries so he cannot be seen as too close or shirk away from the differences and he mentions for instance that we should refrain from nationalism and that all the western partners should

i offered a narrow fix for this in what was true interstate commerce because of the otential con fusion -- mr. defazio: i yield myself two minutes. i offered a narrow fix for this in what was a true interstate commerce. this is an incredibly broad exemption. we heard, you have to pull over. no matter where you are. if you don't take your rest break you have to be paid but you done have to pull over. this would preempt paid rest breaks, paid meal breaks, paid sick leave, paid family leave, payment for time detained at a loading dock, payment for anything other than a flat rate by the load. i mean, this this is an extraordinary preemption we have here. the drivers are already exempt from the fair labor standards act, so they can't get overtime. if we wipe out the state laws and there is no existing federal law, boy, truck drivers are really getting it stuck to them here. in fact, this amendment would expand federal preemption over trucking operations to include wages and working conditions, something that congress never thought about in 1994. largest trucking organization, the team steers, amer

matsui: there are algorithms and assumptions, what happens after that? mr. zuckerberg: can you clarify? rep. matsui: if you supplemented data and say you own it but supplemented when other data brokers use their own algorithms to supplement this and make their own assumptions, then what happens? timmy, somebody else is taking that over. -- to you say that to me, me, somebody else is taking over. mr. zuckerberg: you control how your data is used and can remove it at anytime. you can get rid of your account and all of it at once. rep. matsui: you cannot get it back once it is out there, right? data, but,n our own once it is used to advertising, we lose control over it, is that i write? -- right? mr. zuckerberg: i disagree, a tenant of our advertisement system is we do not sell data to our advertisers, there is a core misunderstanding about how the system works. if you are a shop and selling muffins, you may want to target people in a specific town who may be interested in baking or some demographic. we do not send the information to you, we show the message to

mr. todd. basically, what we have here is a situation where every american understands that china is stealing our intellectual property. they're forcing of transfer of our technologies when companies go to china and by doing that they steal jobs from america and they steal factories from america and we run an unprecedented $370 billion a year trade deficit in goods. this is an unsustainable situation. what we've done in a very measured way over the course of many months is develop a plan to make the situation significantly better. that plan is being implemented and includes both tariffs to recover the damages that china

what's going to be your handle? mr. solomon: i'm leaving the tweeting to lloyd blankfein. ik: for now. but let's say -- let's describe lloyd's voice on twitter as why and mischievous -- wry and mischievous. what would yours be? a. solomon: i'm not forecaster. i will manage that if and when it becomes important for me to do that. erik: great to see you. that is david solomon, president and ceo -- chief operating officer at goldman sachs. vonnie: there were a lot of nuggets in there. mark, he said at the end user forecaster afford faster but he is already seeing goldman sachs take a little share from the deutsche bank retreat, clearly thinking like a ceo. vonnie,though he said, he clearly believes deutsche bank is retreating from investment banking in the u.s. when he sees it, casting doubt on whether he believes it will happen but surely goldman is a big market player and will take advantage of that if and when it happens. let's get the sainsbury announcing plans to buy walmart's after. coup.oop, achieving a i loved your gadfly piece. >> this $10 million deal is a big coup,

what we are going to do together. pres. trump: thank you. would you like to choose somebody? >> your turn. >> mr. trump, speaking about the economy and the economic corporations, with my country, what is the message for investors? what is your opinion about the investment? pres. trump: i think all three would be great places to invest. stable governments, incredible people. hard-working industrious people. i think they would be -- there would be great places to invest. i would have no problem with it. i think as president of the united states, they would call it a slight conflict of interest perhaps. thesey be hearing from people. no, i think it would be a great place. i think all three would be a great place to invest. >> thank you. pres. trump: thank you. -- >> firstaid: >> a question to president trump. the concern of the baltic states is russia. before the press conference, you , goodt the same time relationship with russia is not bad. but how are you going to deal with president putin? is he your enemy or someone you can have dialogue with? the question is to our president , is the defense of