mr. jacoby, you can answer that. part of the acceleration says how administration people reacted initially and how that kept accelerating the process. can you elaborate on that as well. >> of course. to your question, i think these university presidents are in an impossible position. they are answering to so many different constituencies. here comes this very complex problem. maybe the most complicated problem in history, in some ways with this conflict in the middle east coming onto their campuses. with all this passion and trauma attached to it. they have to navigate that on top of constituencies on and off campus. this is sort of like quicksand. an administrator would make one move and then sink further there. this was very difficult to navigate for them. in response to the caller's question. not all of the protesters would agree that this is a black-and- white moral question about the war in gaza. and what we are seeing every day in terms of the assault there. that is motivating a lot of the protest movement. i t

mr. jacoby, he started the documentary taking a look at a point where students overtake a building.o show the folks at home a little bit of that and then talk to you about it. >>[ college protests reaching a boiling point after days of any chemical. >> april 30,protrsgaza have bars in a building at columbia university. they demanded the school severed ties with israel. >> protesters say if columbia tries to remove them by force the school will have blood on its hands. >> less than 24 hours later, columbia university called in the police. >> it looks like a military grade -- coming for them right now with protesters on both sides. >> we see an officer approaching a window right now. the first officer has entered the window, people are screaming on the street in response. ■n>> the clashes at columbia tht night with the culmination of months of chaos sweeping across american college campuses. >> that is the high point, why start there? guest: as you can see, that body cam footage from the when we watched this unfold, and various universities around the cotr get to this point? that is r

mr. jacoby, thank you for joining us>> thank you for . >> what brought this on, whao l?ganization after october 7. ■rwe really started shooting ths in the wake of the october 7 hamas attack and then as this war is developed, and prostcampt would culminate as it has with d crashes with police and schools, presidents having to testify in front of congress. it's been quite a wild story. host: if you hadin retrospect, u think the increase is coming from? what do you think of the main driver? guest's a number of factors here. one is generational. i think the sixth -- this generation of students is activated about this war for lots of different reasons. i think social media plays a big role in that. of the main factors we focus on in the film is the convergence of outside forces project a narrative here.of whether it be pro-israel oolitil forces or political activists with various different agendas, we've found that in our reporting, with everyone looking to set the narrative here, that has created this kind of tempest that we've seen in the past 7, 8 months. : specifically, w

mr. jacoby, you start the documentary taking a look at a very salient point. i want to show the folks at home a little bit of that and talk to you about it. [video clip] >> college protests reaching a boiling point. >> april 20, 20 24, protesters condemning the war in gaza barricaded themselves in a building at columbia university. they demanded the school several ties -- sever ties with israel. >> protesters say on social media if columbia tries to remove them by force, the school will have blood >> on its hands. >>>> less than 24 hour's leader, the police. >> it looks like a barricade vehicle coming down amsterdam right now. >> we see an officer approaching the window right now. the first officer has entered the window. on the street in response. >> i am now seeing the nypd. >> [singing] >> the clashes at columbia that night work at the culmination of months of chaos sweeping across american college campuses. . host: is the high point. why start there? guest: as you can see with the body cam footage and with nypd, this unfold first at columbia and then vario

mr. jacobi, a super-scientific ste, is an excellent person in all respects, and that science has the rightis no pedantry in him, but there is a true, fiery passion for science and an equally fiery desire to be useful, hospitable and grateful to russia. panigerik was published at the same hour as boris yaakobe, at that time already a famous physicist, experimenting in the field of electromechanics, tested a battery boat on the neva. the electric ship, as he called his small vessel, traveled more than two miles on a single battery charge with eleven passengers on board. it was an undoubted success. imagine: 1839 and an electric boat. further development of the idea with an electric ship was hampered only by the high price and imperfection of galvanic batteries. therefore , electric-powered commercial water transport did not appear soon, but the telegraph in that era was already conquering the minds of people with might and main markets for entrepreneurs. who is boris yakubi and why? in a newspaper article it was noted that he was a guest in russia, but a welcome and respected guest. allegedl

mr. jacoby, thank you for joining us>> thank you for . >> what brought this on, whao lt

mr. jacoby, in a sense of the funding of the groups that she mentioned?e done on the funding sources for some of these groups on both sides. that is not really what we get into very deeply in this ere touch upon what was brought up about the student statements and what they actually said and what their motivations were, again using the pro-hamas label can be problematic in some instances but we delve into that in this film. we just say that i think in terms of biden's foreign policy whether or not this movement has really affected the u.s. stance ny substantive way is difficult to draw that link. it was a moment in the lead up to the israel rafah invasion and not holding back certain types of u.s. missiles or bombs and armaments was related in some way, i think people have been drawing that sort of link. i am not sure there is evidence to support that but i do think that pamela raises an interesting point about the politics. we are in an election year of pg parallels between now and 1968 in terms of what this might mean for domestic politics that there is

mr. jacoby, thanks for joining us again. >> thanks for having me.r ha>> what prompted you to take look at this? >> working with part organization based out of new york we decided right after october 7 two we saw immediately there were student statements and reactions to student statements on the campuses and felt this would be an interesting story to follow. we really started shooting this right in the wake arof the october 7 hamas attack and as the war developed and certainly as the protests movement have developed on campus and had no idea it would culminate at the end of the school year in clashes with police and schools presidents having to justify in front of congress it's been quite a wild story to follow. >> if you had to take a look at it in retrospect, what do you think is the increase what is the main one is generational factor the generation of students is acteout this war for lots of different reasons. i think social media plays a big role in that. one of the main factors we focus on in the film is the convergence of outside forces that are looking to set the narrative here. w