. >> thank you, mr. adams. >> i have a question, sir. i mean, there is a reason why they changed it as you just explain. the below-market for the bmr housing, i mean, do you have any idea of of vacancy or non- vacancy? as far as violators of that program, and what enforcement is being done. >> i do not have that to stick some vacancies read i do know sometimes when we work with news answers, sponsors mean project sponsors. they are challenged to meet our marketing requirements which ensure fair housing law and ensure broad distribution of opportunity. we go through a lottery process. there can be delays in these, especially with new operators on new providers are folks who are not accustomed to our rules. >> i get it. as a realtor for 21 years, i deal with the mayor's office and have two bmr mrs right now. >> excellent. are they leased up? >> no. you shouldn't ask that question. [laughter] the question is here, i noticed that the policy has changed recently and the bmr system is quite different. as the appellants had mentioned. i would l

any democrats such as the chairman of intel, mr. adam schiff would say this collusion in plain sight, that's just a false narrative, that's a lie to the american people. mr. mueller put that event. every time judiciary committee democrats tried to walk obstruction just do my cash to put little green checkmarks, mr. mueller what kind of say i don't subscribe to your analysis. these are the kinds of problems you saw yesterday. they were hoping for something they've not been able to do. and it fell flat. >> martha: when you were talking about fusion gps, glenn simpson, the questions that were not asked about the investigation in terms of the origins, it seemed like they had cherry picked moments that were interested in and even outside the timeline, things that happen before and things that happened shortly after, he was not interested or certainly not informed. were you surprised he didn't seem to know what fusion gps was? >> i was very surprised at that and also, this has been the narrative for a long time about this trump tower meeting t

our the reality that our unions are leaving in brazil since the term or presidency and now with mr wilson adam the reality of our union movement and workers is getting worse and worse day by day they have they have thrown away legislation that was in place since the 1940 about the the resourcing of the unions they are talking about. labor reforms and they have already put in place labor reforms that damages really damages the outcome of the union activity in brazil unions in brazil are going through a very very warry president very very difficult situation in terms of their own resources to resourcing and talking and engage with the struggle with the government because of the labor reforms government is putting in place that goes against workers and unions and just one last question very quickly present paulson are suggested the e.u. mercosur deal even as it is in process could spur a domino effect of either a trade deals perhaps most immediately with japan do you think i want to happen. i don't think so i think that there is a speed. gringo's of these trade agreements since the ninety's and m

mr. gerry adam, thank you for your vision and this cause we're here to celebrate.accept this on behalf of all our colleagues and all the men and women in law enforcement. i think today, you think about the adl, what it's done and what it's meant. the good news is that the adl exists. the bad news is that the need for the adl and its mission is greater today than it was yesterday, last year, and the decade before. i want you all to think and pause for a minute and stake stock where we're at as a nation and as a world, where people are being a targeted for the religion they choose. they're being targeted for the person they choose to love. they're being targeted for the color of their skin. they're being vilified for their nation of birth. they're being vilified mothers having their children taken from their bosom. i get vilified because i was raised, do not forget where you came from, i was raised to not forget the blessings you receive. i was raised to reach back and bring people forward. so i just want to tell the folks in this room, thank you for your vigilance,

"the prosecutors have been adamant that mr.lynn testified, that he authorized the filing of this b6 form knowing and attending that it contained false statements. mr. flynn cannot give that testimony because it is not true. according to sara carter's reporting, because a plan is refusing to give the testimony they are demanding that he says is not true, federal prosecutors are now planning to portray flynn as a coconspirator in the case. what does that mean for lieutenant general flynn tonight? here now with the full report, fox news investigative reporter sara carter. you know what is so unbelievable about fara violations were never a big deal. you know, mueller and his team, they ignore the russian dossier, which we know was spread before the election to influence the american voters, and imposed, david clarke, michael isikoff. not one bit of information on the paid for russian lies. that became also the basis for the fisa applications. >> that is so true, sean. this is so important about what sidney powell put in her brief,

mr. jerry nadler, and adam schiff. they will handle it very well. i wish we had more time, but i'm glad we have the time that we have. >> bill: a moment to go on mueller's upcoming testimony. that is scheduled today. house judiciary committee, we see it right now. starting on subpoenas for a slew of witnesses named in the mueller report very soon. about 12 of them. former utah congressman, jason, jason chaffetz. congratulations on the book. while come back here to our program. >> thanks, bill. you heard from speaker pelosi. >> bill: what is your expectation as they try to negotiate for this next week? >> well, negotiations within the committee structure require the concurrence of the minority, and i don't think doug collins and devin nunes are just going to roll over and allow the democrats to reconstitute the rules of the house of representatives. each member gets 5 minutes to question the witness. the chairman can invoke a 30 minute rule, where he can unilaterally ask 30 minutes of questions, but they also get those.

mr. gray: yesterday in parliament, a young man named adam, who has learning difficulties, spoke at the launch report from the disability benefits consortium entitled "has welfare become unfair?" adam told us about how, as a result of cuts to his benefit support, he has had to choose support, he has had to choose between paying to travel to his appointments and buying milk. what does the prime minister say to adam, and how does she respond to the report, which says that disability benefits have been cut four times faster than others in the nine years that she has been in government? pm may: can i say to the honorable gentleman that obviously the secretary of state has heard the specific case that he has raised. the support that we have given to disabled people and people with health conditions is at a record high, and spending on disability benefits will be higher in every year to 2023 than in 2010. and what we have also done, what we have also done is provided support and continue to provide support for disabled people to get into the workplace, and we see the number of disabled people in wor

more, bipartisan in terms of his work over the years on this matter of defense, adam smith, period. it is a good bill, mr. speaker. it takes care of the men and women. it provides for the necessary resources. and yes, it says we ought to have an aumf. t is now 18 years old. now with respect to the pay raise that was going to happen anyway, i presume the gentleman refers to the recommendation of the president of the united states and republicans. we took the recommendations of the president of the united states and put it in our bill. and it is higher than any figure that was put in for our men and women in uniform in the previous 10 years the republicans controlled the house and controlled -- and controled this bill. there were poison pills from my perspective in the defense bills in years past. and i now note i have voted against those bills when they've passed the house, i voted for the conference committee when it came back. i'm hopeful that the republicans will decide that the rhetoric they use if you vote against this bill, meaning the defense bill, to our side if you vote against this bill, you vot

adam schiff was very good in guiding mr. mueller in that direction. to say and i quote, we should hold our elections to a higher standard than mere evidence of criminality. mueller said certainly. >> we will squeeze in a break. joaquin castro at the intelligence hearing committee will join us next. you try hard, you eat right... mostly. you make time... when you can. but sometimes life gets in the way, and that stubborn fat just won't go away. coolsculpting takes you further. a non-surgical treatment that targets, freezes, and eliminates treated fat cells, for good. discuss coolsculpting with your doctor. some common side-effects include temporary numbness, discomfort, and swelling. don't imagine results, see them. coolsculpting, take yourself further. i've always been i'm still going for my best... even though i live with a higher risk of stroke due to afib not caused by a heart valve problem. so if there's a better treatment than warfarin, i'll go for that. eliquis. eliquis is proven to reduce stroke risk better than warfarin. plus has significantly

adam schiff was very good in guiding mr. mueller in that direction.actually got him to say and i quote, we should hold our elections to a higher standard than mere evidence of criminality. mueller said certainly. >> we will squeeze in a break. joaquin castro at the intelligence hearing committee will join us next. igence hearine will join us next. you should be mad at airports. excuse me, where is gate 87? you should be mad at non-seasoned travelers. and they took my toothpaste away. and you should be mad at people who take unnecessary risks. how dare you, he's my emotional support snake. but you're not mad, because you have e*trade, whose tech helps you understand the risk and reward potential on an options trade it's a paste. it's not liquid or a gel. and even explore what-if scenarios. where's gate 87? don't get mad. get e*trade and start trading today. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, hmm. exactly. so you only pay for what you need. nice. but, uh... what's up with your... partner? not again. limu that's your reflection. only pay for w

mr. buschon. >> thank you, adam chair wom. >> dr. buschon. >> i'm sorry. >> thank you. i would agree mr. schraeder that the sample issue a red herring. i'll say as a physician, the basic premise that we practice medicine based on this type of thing as a group is -- is false. we use -- i would decide what type of medication the patient is on and then ask my staff do you have any samples of this not the other way around. it's just -- honestly -- the other thing is from a pbm perspective i don't restricted formalaries i don't like it when non-maryland medical people don't lah access to medications based on profit. en a we've heard a lot of them. and i don't think -- that may not be pervasive across the industry but there clearly are substantial evidence that that's happening. and i -- and i don't believe it when -- when people say that -- that drug companies aren't being called literally daily and talking about list provides and margins and things like that. that is happening. and it's a -- the incentives are just dis -- not alined. the last thing i'll aand we have a couple of questions. we

mr. jerry nadler or adam schiff, when did you know that the dnc and the clinton campaign paid for the dossiert was created by a british agency with a russian health? they conspired this entire thing. that would be an interesting question, but we have not heard that from them. the mainstream media, and it would be interesting if we hear about it from mr. mueller, but i doubt that we will. >> sandra: "the new york times" this morning will present to make or break moments for democrats. do you think tomorrow changes things? >> i don't think so per se because the american people are already on to what is taking place. we see how many millions of dollars has been spent on this whole event. it is not on issues that affect everyday americans. and i think they're kind of tired of it. think about it. they have heard adam schiff say for over two years i have clear evidence of russian collusion, yet none has been presented or found, so i don't think it will make much difference. i don't think it will be -- i don't think it's going to affect the american people very much. >> sandra: how have you had memb

mr hunt, said the seizure was unacceptable and britain's response would be considered but robust. paul adamsts. iran says the stena impero and its multinational crew, which does not include any britons, is now being held at the port of bandar abbas. the authorities there say the tanker is being investigating following an accident involving a fishing boat. the ships owners have not confirmed this and say no rules were broken. the stena impero was making its way through the narrow strait of hormuz in international waters when it was intercepted by helicopter and several small boats. it made a sharp turn north towards iran. its last reported position a few miles south—west of the iranian island of larak. we will respond in a way that is considered but robust, and we are absolutely clear that if this situation is not resolved quickly, there will be serious consequences. a second tanker, the mesdar was also detained, but only briefly. it is now making its way towards a port in saudi arabia. but concerns over the safety of shipping are arising. i don't think the raising of tensions further is in a

joining me now is democratic congressman adam schiff, the chair of the intelligence committee. mr.man, thank you very much for being with us. know you've been busy. what's different this morning? we heard from robert mueller yesterday before judiciary and your committee. >> his work was not filtered by bill barr who misrepresented it. it wasn't filtered by the president who certainly misrepresents it on a daily basis. but this is guy who's served the country his entire life talking about that work and laying out how unethical, unpatriotic, criminal these actions are to willingly accept help from a foreign government to obstruct justice. so i think hearing that from the man who did the work was powerful. >> the words you just used, those were your words, tow. those were not necessarily his words. his words were typically yes, no, correct, if it's in the report i agree with it. >> that's correct. to use that metaphor, yes that's true. he was a reluctant witness. we understood from the very moment he said he wasn't going to come in that he wanted the ten mintsts to be his statement th

at least here is how the intelligence committee chairman adam schiff explained it to reporters today. >> will mr. zebley be participating tomorrow as a witness or as counsel for mr. mueller? >> the special counsel's office has made it clear for some time that they would like to have him present, they would like to allow him to answer questions. we want this hearing to be about director mueller. we are in discussions with them about the role of his counsel and those discussions are ongoing. i expect that he will be there, but we would like to make sure that the degree that he participates that it may be on technical issues or other matters. we don't want him as a substitute for mueller's voice. >> was this a last-minute request? >> no, they have made this request for some time. we're willing to try to accommodate, but like many things about the hearing, it has been a constant process of negotiation and refinement. >> okay. literally while we were just playing that sound bite from adam schiff, i was just handed some breaking news on this very subject. you just heard there how intelligence committe

a bid to impeach mr trump was blocked in the house of representatives last night. our world affairs correspondent paul adamse temperature rises. donald trump's re—election campaign is well under way. this is what the next year will look and sound like. and tonight i have a suggestion for the hate filled extremists who are co nsta ntly hate filled extremists who are constantly trying to tear our country down. they never have anything good to say. that's why i say if they don't like it, let them leave. and who are these dangerous people? they are four recently elected members of congress, all women of colour, all members of the democratic party, all fierce critics of the president. three are american by birth, one, ilhan 0mar, came to america as a child. in his north carolina speech, mr trump attacked all four but his reference to 0mar triggered a new slogan. omar has a history of launching vicious anti—semitic screeds. history of launching vicious anti-semitic screeds. three years ago the chant was lock her up, now it is sent her back. the president's critics are appalled. not since george wallace 50 years a

adams hold up your hand. [applause] you may remember him from the 2018 state of the union address here in washington. mr. president, you recognized him. he supported himself through high school and he got a job through the recession only to lose it and then he was hired at dow manufacturing where like our other manufacturers, dow committed to providing the resources necessary to allow him to become a welder and add to his portfolio. that is one example of many we look forward to working with you. and working with you to continue to of skill the workforce. ms. trump: that is amazing, thank you. [applause] so i would like to recognize many other great companies and workers across the nation that have joined us here today. employees from apple, samsung, siemens, and so many other great businesses. if you could all stand, we would love to give you a round of applause. [applause] ms. trump: one of the things that has been so impactful for us is to travel around the country and here the individual new have a ways have opened up for you as a result of the training experiences you have undertaken. and hearing fr

he is adamant that there will not be any reworking of mrs may's deal. is that thatis mrs may's deal. his views is that that is it, it is as good as it will get, and there is no point britain complaining the deal has somehow been foisted upon them, because britain agreed to the deal. this of course at precisely the moment where we know that mr huntjohnson have said mrs may's deal is dead, and in mrjohnson‘s pace, with a bit more determination and ambition and ambition and optimism that he can get a better deal, and mr hunt staying with his skills as a business negotiator, he can get a better deal. michel barnier is saying, in effect, forget it. the deal is the deal and it is not changing. have a listen. this document is so important and i recognise it is not so easy to read. 600 pages. because we have put into this document with the uk, not against the uk, with the uk, the legal answers to each and every point of uncertainty created by brexit. that is the point. that is why this document is the only way to leave the eu in an orderly manner. and if we jus

adam sandler. he was set to appear in the upcoming hbo comedy series "mrs. fletcher."just 20 years old. >>> uncertainty and criticism surrounding saudi arabia's decision to invite nicki minaj to perform later this month. it was last year the ultraconservative king come lifted a 35-year ban on movie theaters and gave women the right to vote. right now, many women's rights activists still remain in prison. so why did minaj who is known for her explicit lyrics and risque performances get this controversial invite, and how will she respond? a cnn contributor and contributing op-ped writer for "the new york times." human rights advocates are calling on minaj to cancel her performance. do you think it would be a double standard if she goes through with it? >> i mean, seven figures is a lot of money, so it's going to be a surreal sight to see nicki minaj twerking to "anaconda" at the music festival funded by bin salman, right, an absolute monarch. a man who looks king joffrey look competent. it's interesting she's going to perform "anaconda" talking about -- women who are all

mr. robert mueller as the department justice and they said keep to the letter of the robert mueller report. adam schiff set a letter to mr. robert mueller and he does like that because he was to answer every question. it reads: pete: in other words, we will ask you questions and we want answers. brian: there-- democratic point of view what they want to call bush and republican view in which they want to call bush and that's why when robert mueller says i will come down and was delayed for a couple weeks, republicans seem as anxious as democrats. here's mark meadows. he will focus on some things that are not in the report. listen. >> there needs to be fewer speeches of more questions are quite we look at this the conclusions that robert mueller reached are not supported by the facts and it's interesting, adam schiff is writing a letter saying he wants to go beyond the scope of what is reported. he really doesn't want that because the deeper we dive the more we see this whole report and its conclusion starts a ballpark. steve: two hours from right now we will hand over to brett and martha control

adam serwer from financial times. >> one is that the case ended with mr. epstein pleading to state prosecution charges and immunized coconspirators. did crow consider his victims in that case to be prostitutes and why did you immunize the coconspirators. >> the answer to were the victims prostitutes, no, they were victims end of story. they were victims. the second part of that is in the purpose in this case was to bring epstein to jail, to put him behind bars. and so there were other individuals that may have been involved that in any type of conspiracy, there are individuals around someone. the focus really is on the top player and that's where our focus appropriately was. let me also say something, because a lot has been said about this 13-month. when we proceeded, the expectation was that it would be an 18-month sentence, and the expectation was that it would be served in jail. and so this work release was complete bs, and i have been on record as far back as 2011 saying that it was not what was bargained for and it was not what we expected. but this w

mr. speaker, you'll see devon nunes leading it on the republican side of the aisle, and adam schiff leading it on the democratic side of the aisle. i can picture those two faces because i usually see them on split screens on fox or msnbc and i can't think of many things they've had to say where they agreed with one another over the past four, five years. and yet we have a bill today in sharp contrast to the partisan nonsense that was the ndaa operation last week. we have a bill that has come out of the intelligence committee with two strident, passionate republican and democrat leaders there on the intelligence committee, that came out unanimously, that they presented unanimously in front of the rules committee last night, and we have a chance to pass here on the floor of the house. you also find in this rule, mr. speaker, 31 amendments that have been made in order to that intelligence re-authorization bill, even though we found bipartisanship in the committee, even though we found unanimity in the committee, the rules committee in its wisdom last night decided to make 31 more ideas availab

mr. rosenfield" letter. she admitted to the throat cutting, the stab wounds to the back and absolutely adamant that robert had to do with it whatsoever. >> so jessica's affidavit was sent off to the governor too. and everybody waited. and waited. and then, on the governor's very last day in office, more than nine years into robert's sentence, a decision. denied. rosenfield, devastated, drove to the prison to tell robert. >> robert and i hugged. we cried. and probably it is about the most painful part of this process. >> robert's only door to freedom slammed shut. but half a world away, someone else was watching robert's case. could his opinion make a difference? >> coming up -- >> the police detective in robert's corner. when "dateline: extra" continues. ormal person who got an awful skin condition. with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe eczema, or atopic dermatitis, you feel like you're itching all the time. and you never know how your skin will look. because deep within your skin an overly sensitive immune system could be the cause. so help heal your skin from within, with dupixent. dupixent is not a steroid,

more, bipartisan in terms of his work over the years on this matter of defense, adam smith, period. it is a good bill, mr. speaker. it takes care of the men and women. it provides for the necessary resources. and yes, it says we ought to have an aumf. t is now 18 years old. now with respect to the pay raise that was going to happen anyway, i presume the gentleman refers to the recommendation of the president of the united states and republicans. we took the recommendations of the president of the united states and put it in our bill. and it is higher than any figure that was put in for our men and women in uniform in the previous 10 years the republicans controlled the house and controlled -- and controled this bill. there were poison pills from my perspective in the defense bills in years past. and i now note i have voted against those bills when they've passed the house, i voted for the conference committee when it came back. i'm hopeful that the republicans will decide that the rhetoric they use if you vote against this bill, meaning the defense bill, to our side if you vote against this bill, you vot

a bid to impeach mr trump was blocked in the house of representatives last night. our world affairs correspondent paul adamsrump's re—election campaign is well under way. this is what the next year will look and sound like. and tonight i have a suggestion for the hate—filled extremists who are constantly trying to tear our country down. they never have anything good to say. that's why i say if they don't like it, let them leave. and who are these dangerous people? they are four recently elected members of congress, all women of colour, all members of the democratic party, all fierce critics of the president. three are american by birth, one, ilhan omar, came to america as a child. in his north carolina speech, mr trump attacked all four but his reference to omar triggered a new slogan. omar has a history of launching vicious anti—semitic screeds. three years ago the chant was lock her up, now it is send her back. the president's critics are appalled. not since george wallace 50 years ago has racial demagoguery featured so prominently in a presidential campaign. but in 2019 for donald trump it works. i like

adams: i thank the gentleman for yielding. mr. speaker, i rise today to join my colleagues in strong support of h.r. 582, the raise the wage act. i've been fighting for working families for three decades now. from the state house in north carolina to here in the u.s. house. i led the successful effort in my state to raise the state's minimum wage in 2006 from $5.15 to $6.15 an hour. then, in 2009, the federal government raised the wage to $7.25. that was 12 years ago. the minimum wage hasn't increased since. only the cost of living has increased. folks working full time, earning the minimum wage aren't making enough to feed their families and that's not acceptable. no one working full time should live in poverty. working hard is not enough if you don't make enough. that's why i'm a proud supporter of h.r. 582, the raise the wage act. the raise the wage act would increase wages for 150,000 people in my district in north carolina. it's not just good for workers, it's good for the economy, and unlike the g.o.p. tax code -- tax cuts w

our first witness is adam koeppen, direcop cohen. before joining google, mr. cohen was an economic correspondent for dow jones and "the wall street journal." mr. cohen received his a.b. from harvard university and m.s. from the london school of economics. our second witness, matt perault, head of global policy development at facebook, leading the company's global public policy planning efforts on lault a law enforcement and human rights officers and also overseen public policy for what'sapp, ocluus, and facebook, artificial intelligence research. before joining facebook he was counsel at the congressional oversight panel as well as a consultant at the world bank. he received his bachelor's degree from brown university. mpp from duke university stanford school of public policy and jd from harvard law school. our third witness is nate sutton. oversees all competition-related litigation and regulatory matters for the company. before joining amazon, mr. sutton was a trial attorney with the dd deprmt of justice antitr divisi division. he also worked at the law firm

adam schiff. we're also joined by elijah cummings, the chairman of the reform and oversight committee. a committee running its reports as well. first i yield to the distinguished chairman of the judiciary committee mr. nadler? >> thank you madam speaker. today the american people heard directly about the special counsel investigation uncovered. as to russia's interference in the 2016 election and the cooperation of the president, and obstruction of justice. mueller made clear that the president is not exonerated. there was evidence of obstruction of justice and abuses of power by the president. the reports said the president could be indicted for obstruction of justice after he leaves office. he found that trump would and did benefit from russia's help and that the campaign welcomed that help. there are multiple instances were are all three elements of criminal obstruction of justice were met. trying to fire the special counsel in order to stop the investigation, trying to have people lie and cover up for him or the same purpose, trying to limit or impede or constrict the special counsel's investigation, trying to tamper with witnesses cooperating with investigators. all of these were found with gr

mr. mueller's testimony. it's clear what trump and barr said about total exoneration is not true. >> but house intelligence chair adam schiff made the case today that having the grounds for impeachment doesn't necessarily mean impeachment is inevitable. >> you just went through the elements. and the facts that we know that proved what you said was, you know, the perfect case for collusion. so, if we've got those facts, if we've got that information, how do you justify to the american people, not following up with an impeachment inquiry? >> well, the constitution provides impeachment as a remedy. it doesn't compel congress to act and impeach whenever there are grounds for impeachment. >> well, that leads to us the ultimate arbiter on the impeachment question, nancy pelosi. the house speaker has been kicking the can down the impeachment road since democrats took the house, arguing for patience. and the issue is risky. and divisive even within her own caucus. only one additional democrat, lori trahan of massachusetts got behind impeachment after mueller's testimony. here's pelosi with her own savannah guthrie i get befo

mr. mueller's testimony. it's clear what trump and barr said about total exoneration is not true. >> but house intelligence chair adammade the case today that having the grounds for impeachment doesn't necessarily mean impeachment is inevitable. >> you just went through the elements. and the facts that we know that proved what you said was, you know, the perfect case for collusion. so, if we've got those facts, if we've got that information, how do you justify to the american people, not following up with an impeachment inquiry? >> well, the constitution provides impeachment as

mr. langevin: on my staff, i'm indebted to katie lee and todd adams, my chief of staff who has been intimately involved for more years than he would like to commit. i want to thank chairman pallone and his staff and ranking member walden for supporting this effort through the committee and i acknowledge the leadership of senator collins. i hope that our actions today will help her in her effort to get this important bill through our sister chamber. and i want to thank the gentlelady from washington state, many mrs. mcmorris rodgers for partnering with me on this bill. when we first attempted to re-authorize the bill and her continued leadership on this issue in congress and on many others in the disability community. . urge to vote in favor and i thank the gentleman for yielding and i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. the gentleman from texas is recognized. mr. burgess: i recognize the gentlelady from washington state . the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady is recognized. mrs. mcmorris rodgers: i want to first say how much admire and appr

intelligence committee adam schiff early in questions asked the former special counsel to confirm that the report said that russia wanted president trump to win the election. the response from mr. mueller was quote, generally that would be accurate. from the -- from the report and that was largely how he answered questions. was to confirm or deny what was already written in the report. he was constrained a bit by the letter that the justice department had addressed to the committees and to mr. mueller about areas he could cover in his testimony today before the two committees. here on cspan3 we are waiting for the news conference with house speaker nancy pelosi ant chairs of the intelligence and judiciary committees. then we'll hear from kevin mccarthy, the republican leader -- the house republican leader following that. all of those will be live and we'll continue to take calls and hear from cherry in morristown, tennessee, on our democrats line. >> hi. >> hi, there you're on the air. >> thank you for having me. i'm just wanting to say that i watched the judiciary and the house, and i have a lot of respect for mr. mueller. and i think that he had an exhausting job. and i thin

mr. chairman, and don't overlook that. it's a crime, too. a remarkable day in the history of this country and the chairman of the committee, adam schiff joins us live next. , adam schif joins us live next ♪ ♪ [ text notification now that you have] new dr. scholl's massaging gel advanced insoles with softer, bouncier gel waves, you'll move over 10% more than before. dr. scholl's. born to move. most people think a button is just a button. ♪ that a speaker is just a speaker. ♪ or - that the journey can't be the destination. most people haven't driven a lincoln. discover the lincoln approach to craftsmanship at the lincoln summer invitation. right now, get 0% apr on all 2019 lincoln vehicles plus no payments for up to 90 days. only at your lincoln dealer. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, plus no payments for uhmm. exactly. so you only pay for what you need. nice. but, uh... what's up with your... partner? not again. limu that's your reflection. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ here, hello! starts with -hi!mple... how can i help? a data plan for everyone. everyone? everyone. let's send to ever

adam from the financial times. the deal that you negotiated and resulted in two things. one is that the case ended with mr. epstein, it immunized his coconspirators. did you consider his victims in that case to be prostitutes and why did you immunized his coconspirators? >> the answer to where the victims prostitutes, no. they were victims. end of story. they were victims. the second part of that, the purpose in this case was to bring epstein to jail. put him behind bars. there were other individuals, the focus is on the top player and that's where our focus appropriately was. let me also say something because a lot has been said about this. when we proceeded, the expectation was that would be needed 18 month sentence in the expectation was that it would be served in jail. and so this work-release was complete b.s. i've been on record as far back as 2011 saying that it was not always bargained for and it was not what we expected. but this was a state court plea and because it was a state court plea, the terms of confinement were under the jurisdiction of the state of florida. and so the outrage over that 1

adams. >> here. >> commissioner dooley is absent. >> a commissioner dwight. >> here. >> a commissioner laguana. >> commissioner ortiz-cartagena. commissioner riley is absent. commissioner zouzounis is running late. >> mrpresident, you have a quorum. >> item two. >> u a general public comment allows members of the public to comment on matters within the small business commission's jurisdiction but not on today's calendar and suggest new agenda items for the commission's future considerations. discussion item. >> do we have any members of the public who would like to comment on any item not on today's agenda? okay, seeing none, public comment is closed. next item please. >> item 3, approval of legacy business ap rications and resolutions. discussion and action item. the presenter is richard kuyylo, legacy business program manager, office of small business. >> u a welcome. >> good afternoon, president adams, commissioner, office of small business staff. richard kurylo, legacy business program manager. sfgov tv, i have a power point presentation. for your today are six applications for legacy business registry. the applications were reviewed to me, submitted to planning department and heard by the histori

adam schiff. stone's attorney, yes. judge jackson, how about this one from june 2nd? stone's lawyer answers before she even asked the question, yes, this was mr stone's attorney, i understand the government thinks that he crossed the line and apparently you think he crossed the line. judge jackson, don't tell me what i think. by the end, judge jackson was, as they say in law school, on fument go. the clarity of my order is undisputed. the fact that the defense said it was fine and the order was not challenged on first amendment grounds or any other ground is a matter of record. it didn't take a week before the defendant was emailing buzzfeed calling a witness in this investigation a liar. to suggest that roger stone's posts are not statements by roger stone about this kasscase ignores the power of social media and what makes it different from writing a letter or talking on the phone. maybe his lawyers don't understand it, but he does. it is obvious to me, the judge continues, that you either can't differentiate between the very broad range of speech that you're entitled to engage in and the limited restriction i imposed on you. either you can