mr. ballinger, you have three minutes. >> if you want to indulge me for an extra minute, i can explain why the curb cuts are red. the city map shows that as no parking all along one side of mullen avenue, but the neighbors refused to accept that and took them on the signs. it is very congested. this dispute goes back at least 35 years. that is why the curb cuts remain red. the city did come out and repaint the curbs. but some spots remain from that history. i have a few points i would like to make. i still don't understand why the owners could build as the buildings exist right now, when they are clearly crossing existing property lines -- how they could get financing, city approval. their assertion that they do not need this after all strikes me as hollow. i think they do need this if they plan to develop and enlarge their buildings. once again, the notion of several small lots existing in the neighborhood -- there are not. they are all built upon with large buildings that use a march to lot to develop. buildable small lots are not available. this lot, as approved, at less than 1100 squar