mr. ballister doesn't have the correct information.hat is another distraction, another ploy, if you didn't know mr. ballister of how they put this particular information out to the public, to get you all riled up on what is what. that information is not correct. okay? so if you know anything about politics, will you understand that. so mr. reiskin and the board and public you are talking about -- i expressed this at the last meeting how you want to treat the operators fair. they deserve this and they deserve that. but again, your team at the negotiations table has a totally different attitude. so what you are saying here is totally insulting. it is totally insulting. and it's hard for me to believe that none of you on the board knew about what was going on. this is a calculatedattack on the biggest minority group of employees in the city, period. if you guys really want to help us out, really appreciate the work that the men and women are doing day in and day out for this agency, you would give us a fair contract. >> thank you, mr. wil

curious whoever wants to go first talking about the situation where iran finds itself with ballistic missiles. mr. lauder? >> there are raining ballistic mullahs -- missile program is a capability that is of concern and in fact if it would be difficult to negotiate at this stage given what has transpired already but i would think it would be very important to begin to find a way to add additional constraints on that program and to add additional monitoring against the program. you may recall in the heyday of arms control agreements between the united states and the soviet union we chose to focus on delivery vehicles because they were easier to to monitor in some ways than an air weapons themselves or the nuclear programs themselves and i think constraints and monitoring of the uranium ballistic missile program would be a very useful complement in the types of things we have been talking about safari. >> but do we have the ability to do that? when you're negotiating with the russians and you have arms limitation agreement and you have two superpowers those with a vested interest in trying to calm

curious whoever wants to go first talking about the situation where iran finds itself with ballistic missiles. mr. lauder? >> there are raining ballistic mullahs -- missile program is a capability that is of concern and in fact if it would be difficult to negotiate at this stage given what has transpired already but i would think it would be very important to begin to find a way to add additional constraints on that program and to add additional monitoring against the program. you may recall in the heyday of arms control agreements between the united states and the soviet union we chose to focus on delivery vehicles because they were easier to to monitor in some ways than an air weapons themselves or the nuclear programs themselves and i think constraints and monitoring of the uranium ballistic missile program would be a very useful complement in the types of things we have been talking about safari. >> but do we have the ability to do that? when you're negotiating with the russians and you have arms limitation agreement and you have two superpowers those with a vested interest in trying to calm

wants to go first if you can talk about the situation where iran finds itself right now with ballistic missiles. mr. lauder. >> well, the iranian ballistic missile program is a capability that is of concern, ought to be of concern and, in fact, if -- if it would be difficult to negotiate at this stage given what has transpired already. but i would think that it would be very important to begin to find a way to add additional constraints on that program and to add additional monitoring against the program. i mean, you may recall in the heyday of arms control agreements between the united states and the soviet union, for example, we chose to focus on delivery vehicles, because they were easier to monitor in some ways than the nuclear weapons themselves or the nuclear programs themselves and i think constraints and monitoring on the iranian ballistic missile program would be -- would be a very useful compliment to the types of things that we've been talking about so far. >> do we have the ability to do that in the law? look, when you're negotiating with the russians and you have arms limitation agreem

mr. snyder's property? there was no reason for that except for the fact to kill him. >> based on the ballistic evidence, prosecutors charged ronald harshman with first-degree murder. melvin snyder disappeared on may 25th, exactly one year to the day from when melvin started the affair with teresa harshman. >> mr. harshman is the kind of man that no one was going to tell him what to do. no one was going to take his property. he became very vengeful, very angry. he was not the kind of person that was going to allow his wife to return home and try to rebuild their relationship. there was no forgive and forget. it was, i will get my revenge, and that's what he did. >> prosecutors say that the crime was premeditated. the evidence suggests that harshman drove to melvin's home, found him inside the barn and then shot and killed him with his new .25 caliber pistol. the .25 caliber round probably didn't exit melvin's body. prosecutors believe harshman drove home and returned later on his motorcycle. after he disposed of melvin's body, he put his motorcycle in the back of melvin's truck, which created the damage found in the

ballistic. it was like that scene in the movie "dr. strangelove," remember, mr.resident, it's premier kiss off on the line and he is hopping mad. [laughter] the minister of the interior, had had to have broken into russian tv programming, into the russian opera, the mind boggles, oprah. i always wondered about soviet union, a country with 30,000 nuclear warheads and no dermatologist. [laughter] everyone had warts. then we got gorbachev and viacom you know, the whole thing. anyway, he had broken in to russian programming to reassure to say he was not planning secret to auction off -- he took pains to denounce me personally as a brazen liar and an international provocateur. i thought, cool. [laughter] so eventually everyone got their sense of humor back. maybe except him, but six months later i was on the train going up to new york from my -- from washington and i open my "washington post" and there was a huge headline, kremlin dilution with offers for lemon. the weird thing about it was this was a hoax -- linen. a big, big story. it had apparently alluded the 900,

mr manning's excuse was set for may 7th. we received the letters from the federal bureau of investigation calling into questioning about hair and ballistics we received the first letter on hair on may 22nd. the second on may 4th thes. the last letter also than 12 horse away from the scheduled execution, and asked the court to reopen the case. at that point the court finally stayed the execution. >>> we invite you to watch part 3 of the "the system," airing at 9 eastern. 6 pacificment >>> still ahead - the future of space flights of the the private sector ship designed to carry people into space. and a tiny town full of artists. why they are flocking to a location outside of seattle. >>> we got a glimpse at future space travel at spacex founder revealed the dragons 2 pace craft -- suppose craft. this it is. if all goes well, it will be the first commercially designed and operated vehicle it take humans into space. this space ship is an upgrade of the dragons used to ferry supplies to the international space station. the drag ii is a capable design, alt carry even people into earth's orbit. and to the moon and mars. the built-in thrusters w

iranians are still still developing intercontinental ballistic missiles which can be used against united states so i have a lot of questions to ask. thank you mrchairman. >> thank you. we go to brad sherman of california the ranking member of the subcommittee on terrorism nonproliferation and trade. >> i greet with the -- that this committee was pushing for strong sanctions on iran over the objection of three administrations and iran was brought to the table only because congress imposed sanctions that were resisted by the executive branch. in these negotiations a lot of the focus is on whether iran will enrich and equally important is whether they will stop file. iran's persistence enforcement mechanisms betrays an interest in invasion. it is easier to reactivate a centrifuge cascade that it is to reassemble international sanctions. accordingly we not only need to negotiate with iran but mechanisms there will be to detect invasion that we negotiate with their european and asian partners on automatic sanctions reapplication will apply if any violations is detected. finally our experience with the soviet union illustrates that you can negotiate

iranians are still developing intercontinental ballistic missiles which could be used against the united states. we have a lot of questions to ask. thank you, mr. chairman. >> thank you, judge. now to mr. brad sherman of california, the ranking member on the subcommittee. >> i strongly agree with the statements of the chair and the ranking member reflected that this committee was pushing for strong sanctions on iran over the objection of three administrations and that iran was brought to the table only because congress imposed sanctions that were resisted by the executive branch. in these negotiations, a lot of the focus is on whether iran will enrich, equally important is whether they will stockpile. iran's resistance to enforcement mechanisms bestr stratrays an a interest in evasion. it's easier to reactivate a centrifuge cascade than it is to reassemble international sanctions. accordingly we not only need to negotiate with iran what mechanisms there will be to detect evasion but we need to negotiate with the european and asian partners what automatic sanctions reapplication will apply if those -- if any violation is detected. finally, our