mr. barclay? i think this has already been made clear but to clarify for the record. i want to thank scott san chez in the planning department for agreeing to reevaluate. that's all i have. thank you. >> first i would like to clarify the address. originally this was 132nd avenue, it became el camino del mar not by voice. the board of supervisors decided that every single property with frontage on el camino del mar shall use el camino del mar as the address. subsequent ly the address changed. it's not our choice. i think when it comes to the height limit, they are a lot of data in the evaluation in the record of the planning department sections, drawings that exist to support the department's decision that it's an accurate building that is within the height limit. so i don't have any objection to work with the department to go through all of those and present a very detail analysis to this board. >> thank you. >> are you finished? >> yes. >> all right. the addresses have nothing to do with how the height limit is. the parameters of the site. okay. >> that's correct. >>

mr. ratner's also very concerned with user experience. he says he really wants families to hhve a great time and explains why people like visiting the new barclaysw if you can just get over the brooklyn bridge, valet park the bike, it's fantastic. it just keeps going and going and going as far as this energizer bunny rally is concerned. jim tyny is joining me now. look at this year to date picture of the s&p. you believe this continues to go even though people talk about the tapering, the taper experience that the fed eventually will exhibit, correct? you're not worried. >> no one's talking about the fact that the federal deficit really has come down on an annualized basis. we were at a trillion four run rate just a couple years ago. this year is $650 billion. that's more than cut in half. liz: so we have cut the deficit, and you're just a financial guy. you're not taking a side. >> nope, not politicizing it. liz: look, the cbo, congressional budget office, nonpartisan, says that that is actually true. but why would that be the thing that continues to force this rally higher? >> so what does that mean? if you look at gdp of 2.4% today, that was