mr. barrett? >> you're asking me to use my imagi imagination as to what a systemic risk regulator does. >> i'm asking there are any current companies that would pose systemic risk in the sense your company failed so many companies would fail it was a result in the mass destruction of credit in this country or even the world, that's the question? >> if all else were the same, if the reason for the failure did not impact any of the other companies, or can i think of any other single company out there in the life insurance industry, okay, as a reason they were going to fail did not impact any other company, the answer is no? >> and going back to the previous answer, what you're saying there are certain scenarios we would have something like a terrorist attack a mass disaster, those are the scenarios we should be thinking about in terms of systemic risk. >> in the life insurance industry it could be a broad devalation of credit defaults and so forth. >> to me this had been very helpful. if any of you

mr. president, the defense department barrett 2300 construction and rehabilitation projects on 359 military facilities across the country. so, mr. president, whether it is more energy efficient facilities in the park system or more teachers or more cops and the street, construction cranes and hard hats, will see a lot more this summer. we accelerated our efforts across the federal government. the end of this 100 days we feel confident we will be able to demonstrate we created another 600,000 jobs. fairly ambitious, mr. president, but asked the cabinet to bring what is realistic, what they can get done. as a consequence we are also starting up a new web site today. www.whitehouse.gov/recover, an individual agency websites and the overall website. this will have an individual aspects, because what we want is average americans as they are watching this summer -- visiting, whenever -- we want them knowing that what we are doing is fully transparent, fully accountable, and we want them to watch us closely and we want their input. we want them to tell us whether they think it is working or not wo

mr. chairman and thank you commissioner barrett as chair of oversight and investigations and one of the authors of the food safety enhancement act, we have seen both nine hearings in the last two years just on food safety and certainly is a major problem. one of the problems i found every time we had a hearing there was always a lack of information that the fda did not have the manufacture of the food or the producer of the food and was always difficult to get information. in the safety enhancement act authorizes the fda to issue subpoenas for records and other things relevant to a hearing investigation or proceeding or relative to any other matter within the fda's jurisdiction including matters of the public health service act and the federal anti tampering act. do you believe subpoena power would be beneficial to the fda? >> is very important for us to get access in a timely way to the information that we needed and i think that authority will enable us to act more swiftly and effectively yes. >> well, we hope you would because i think we're still waiting for information from 2007 the salmone

mr. barrett who played a great game. john shimkus who pitched and did well and sam graves who made several highlight catches in the outfield. it was a good game. the democrats did deserve to win. but don't get accustomed to it because we will be back in the spirit of good competition and as mr. doyle said, it was for the washington literacy council and the washington area boys and girls club. i do want to thank the nationals for letting us use their field. and my guess is they will be calling up some of the democrats to play on their team since you have a better winning record now this year than they do. i yield back the balance of my time. doyle doyle we're going to play the nationals next year. mr. barton: congratulations to mike doyle. he deserves the trophy. doyle doyle thank you, mr. speaker. -- mr. doyle: thank you, mr. speaker. t