mr. bergmann and mr. matheny, the questions raised and identified in the hawaii case focus more on alerting authorities and fema than the fcc and the alertingdy disseminay fors. >> yes, i would. i agree with the way you outlined it. the broadcast infrastructure worked. the transmission worked. the message did get out. unfortunately in this case it was a mistaken message. and so i think that as we've been discussing today, it requires us all, in particular on the fema side, to revisit who can generate an alert, and how that alert is generated. but as it relates to the dissemination and the transmission, i think, as you've stated, that piece of the process worked as designed. >> senator duckworth, i would agree as well, too. on the wireless side the alert was delivered exactly as intended. and i think one of the key focuses of this hearing is making sure we have public trust and confidence in the system. and i think we can certainly say we have that on the delivery side, understanding the committee's approp