mr. bowman?the notion that the speaker or democrats who certainly has the majority in the house didn't allow fair proceedings, the caller suggested there wasn't any provision for cross-examination, so forth, just isn't true. the proceedings held in front of the house intelligence committee were proceedings in which the relevant witnesses came before the committee in public on camera, swore to tell the truth, were both examined on both direct and cross-examination by lawyers for both democrats and republicans and were examined by both the democratic and republican representatives. there was exactly the kinds of procedural protections that the caller was talking about in the house proceedings. the notion this didn't happen is a peculiar myth about all this and it started of course with the early phase of the investigation into the ukraine matter when the house intelligence committee, along with a number of other committees conducted private depositions of various potentially relevant witnesses and

mr. bowman? guest: the notion that the speaker or democrats who certainly has the majority in the house didn't allow fair proceedings, the caller suggested there wasn't any provision for cross-examination , so forth, just isn't true. the proceedings held in front of the house intelligence committee were proceedings in which the relevant witnesses came before the committee in public on camera, swore to tell the truth, were both examined on both direct and cross-examination by lawyers for both democrats and republicans and were examined by both the democratic and republican representatives. the kinds of tly procedural protections that the in the as talking about house proceedings. he notion this didn't happen is a peculiar myth about all this and it started of course with the early phase of the investigation into the ukraine matter when the house intelligence committee, along with a number of other committees conducted private depositions of various potentially relevant witnesses and the argument t

mr. bowman comes to mind. i'd like to read his book. i have respect for mr. bolton, but what mr. bolton is offering is not something which changes my mind based upon what he says he had a conversation or he didn't have a conversation with the president. >> host: you mentioned a moment ago that yesterdays russian and answer session helped clarify things on both sides. what couple of points for you further clarified where you will fall eventually on the question of impeachment? >> guest: they had the opportunity on both sides was to questions prepared that allowed them to find hone their point of view, just as an example, why would the president have an interest in ukraine and in the issues surrounding the corruption that is could have been occurring in that country? what were the points? why was he asking for additional information? or in the case of at what point did he actually asked for information about other countries who were providing support and how much support? were we being asked to be unfairly burdened with additional support where other european countries were not hel

mr. bowman?the notion that the speaker or democrats who certainly has the majority in the house didn't allow fair proceedings, the caller suggested there wasn't any provision for cross-examination , so forth, just isn't true. the proceedings held in front of the house intelligence committee were proceedings in which the relevant witnesses came before the committee in public on camera, swore to tell the truth, were both examined on both direct and cross-examination by lawyers for both democrats and republicans and were examined by both the democratic and republican representatives. the kinds of tly procedural protections that the in the as talking about house proceedings. he notion this didn't happen is a peculiar myth about all this and it started of course with the early phase of the investigation into the ukraine matter when the house intelligence committee, along with a number of other committees conducted private depositions of various potentially relevant witnesses and the argument that repu

. >> i rise today to recognize lakeland high school's demarcus bowman who was recently named florida's mr. football. after finishing runner up last year, demarcus beat out the competition this year, having run for over 1,600 yards and 24 touchdowns in only 11 games. as a unanimous five-star running back and the number 16 overall player in the nation, he'll be taking his talent next season to clemson university. not only is he a star football player but demarcus also excels in track but more importantly, he's a young man with a grateful heart who is supported by a devoted family and friends. i'm proud of demarcus and all his dread nouth teammates who represent our district so well. not only do i celebrate their accomplishments on this efield but look forward to seeing them take on the mantle of leadership in their generation. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from georgia seek recognition? -- the gentleman from georgia seek recognition? >> i ask unanimous consent to address the house for one minute and revise and extend my remarks. the speaker pro

bowman, who is the floyd r gibson endowed professor of law at the university of missouri. he is also the author of a recent book, "high crimes and misdemeanors: a history of impeachment before mr. trump." he is also the author of a blog, impeachable offenses. we have dr. monica f injured. as an anthropologist of model, her extension of work on private property and ukraine is book,sis for her current "property and oligarchy." she works in the u.s., ukraine, and other jurisdictional contacts. she has worked with ukraine on ukrainian related issues for 25 years, starting before she became a legal scholar. during her time at the u.s. diplomatic corps, which included at the u.s. embassy in tf. of is currently the director the center for international and comparative law, associate professor of law and an apology at st. louis university. we also have jennifer, who is a activists,ar and devoted to making topics engaging inside and outside of classrooms or does she focuses on white-collar crime. similarly, her advocate advocacy follows follow the money matters pitch he has appeared on cable news programs, including msnbc's bc's "-- "morning joe" focusing on links between the trump and

bowman, lance corporal john hale. sergeant matthew westman, sergeant first class terry wallace, sergeant ray testers, lance corporal derek column, staff sergeant brian lewis, sergeant julian atkins, sergeant william part ridge, corporal david stewart. mrmccaul: i yield an additional 30 seconds. the speaker pro tempore: an additional 30 seconds is granted. mr. abraham: sergeant david murray, first sergeant michael borderla, sergeant nicholas olver, sergeant seth trahan, staff sergeant jonathan reed, staff sergeant christopher ramsey. sergeant michael evans, sergeant robert sweeney, staff sergeant william manual. mr. chairman, i -- i request unanimous consent to enter the rest of my testimony into the record. the speaker pro tempore: without objection. the gentleman from texas reserves. the gentleman from new york is recognized. mr. engel: i now yield one minute to a valued member of the foreign affairs committee, the gentlewoman from pennsylvania, ms. huell hab -- ms. houlahan. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman from pennsylvania is recognized. mr. huelskamp: thank you, mr. chair -- ms. houlahan: thank you, mr. chair. i rise in support of the resolution before us today. article 1, section 8 of the constitution states, quote, cong

bowman, lance corporal john hale. sergeant matthew westman, sergeant first class terry wallace, sergeant ray testers, lance corporal derek column, staff sergeant brian lewis, sergeant julian atkins, sergeant william part ridge, corporal david stewart. mrcaul: i yield an additional 30 seconds. the speaker pro tempore: an additional 30 seconds is granted. mr. abraham: sergeant david murray, first sergeant michael borderla, sergeant nicholas olver, sergeant seth trahan, staff sergeant jonathan reed, staff sergeant christopher ramsey. sergeant michael evans, sergeant robert sweeney, staff sergeant william manual. mr. chairman, i -- i request unanimous consent to enter the rest of my testimony into the record. the speaker pro tempore: without objection. the gentleman from texas reserves. the gentleman from new york is recognized. mr. engel: i now yield one minute to a valued member of the foreign affairs committee, the gentlewoman from pennsylvania, ms. huell hab -- ms. houlahan. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman from pennsylvania is recognized. mr. huelskamp: thank you, mr. chair -- ms. houlahan: thank you, mr. chair. i rise in support of the resolution before us today. article 1, section 8 of the constitution states, quote, congre