mr. boyd, welcome back to "mad money." >> great to be back, jim. >> sir, i think a lot of people who know that i recommend this stock are going to be confused. they're going to see initially that the company made one penny. they're going to see that there was a non-cash foreign currency translation issue. can you break it down why you just don't see agnico-eagle at 16 cents a share? >> essentially we've got a significant component of our balance sheet. there is a deferred tax item there that gets translated every quarter in canadian dollars, so we see a swing there. i think quite rightly you disregard that. as you pointed out in the introduction, what investors should be focused on is the ramp-up in production which, as you said, will continue as we bring in mines in the third quarter and in the first quarter of next year. what we also announced today was two more expansions at the existing project pipeline. so that's going to continue the growth out to 2014. i also think you nailed it in the

and support the language that mr. boyd put in on the house side. those two bits of language are not in opposition of each other. you can support one without the other. but the one that we have the most heartburn about in terms of the bipartisan georgia delegation is the shelby language on the senate side. and i would love to yield to anybody who would like to -- mr. frelinghuysen: let me say i would be happy to work, as i'm sure mr. pastor would, too, see what we could do to be helpful to all involved. mr. pastor: if the gentleman yields to me. mr. frelinghuysen: yes. mr. pastor: mr. kingston, as you know, we have yet to go to conference, but if this is an interest that you and other members have in terms of its effect on your particular states, you have my commitment as well as the ranking member as you heard to work with you and work it out. the chair: the gentleman's time has expired. the gentleman from arizona. mr. pastor: i yield actually four minutes to the gentleman from new york, a member of the energy and water appropriations subcommittee,

mr. boyd: thank you, mr. speaker. i rise today to highlight, mr. speaker, the pay-as-you-go legislation that the house will be considering later this week. this is a bill that the blue dogs and i have endorsed for the last several congresses. now it is a priority of this president and of the house leadership and more than 165 co-sponsors of this legislation. i'm always intrigued by those who would oppose pay-go, like my friend, mr. pence from indiana, who spoke earlier, that basically criticized the deficit spending that has occurred. i assume that he'd be critical of that in the last previous administration and this tad mferings. but yet he seems to oppose the one tool that we have that has proven to control deficit spending. the principle is simple, mr. speaker. you have new spending programs, you have to pay for them. it is very simple. pay-go was one of the tools that led this country in the 1990's to record surpluses. however that tool, pay-go and others that were in place, were allowed to expire under president bush and the republican leaders

with mr. boyd, he looks all american. there's an important caveat for everybody. it's not a question of race. it's a question of action. and in this particular instance we're seeing someone who is radicalized overseas, came back here, and decided based on the indictment, to undertake a series of steps aimed at conducting attacks. we need to get away from what was 9/11, of course, being attacked by an al qaeda-based organization made up exclusively of middle eastern males. what the next threat may look like may look completely different and domestically we're seeing something that is completely different. >> what more do we know about this boyd, in terms of how he lived his life. the scary thing is he is everybody's next door neighbor. what else do we know about him? >> very little right now based on the indictment. we know he traveled to afghanistan, pakistan. he claimed to have fought in the jihad. he was in pakistan and was convicted of robbery wands a going to lose a hand and foot based on islamic law but that conviction was overturned. then in the 1990s his pl

mr. boyd: we can't live on credit forever. this bill is the first step we need to restore fiscal sanity to washington. every one here wants to lead the prosperous country with a better standard of living. i urge my republican lleagues many who stood up and supported pay-go in the past, to support this responsible legislation today. i furthermore challenge the senate to share equally in our goal to balance our budget and ensure new programs are paid for. i urge a yes vote. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired. the gentleman from wisconsin. mr. ryan: i yield two minutes to the gentleman from california plrks campbell. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized for two minutes. mr. campbell: i thank the gentleman from wisconsin for yielding. pay-go is a sham. now that's a very strong word, but the facts to support it are equally strong. in the last congress, since democrats took control and pay-go was enacted, $420 billion of new spending was exempted from its provision. over the last

mr. boyd: we can't live on credit forever. this bill is the first step we need to restore fiscal sanity to washington. every one here wants to lead the prosperous country with a better standard of living. i urge my republican colleagues many who stood up and supported pay-go in the past, to support this responsible legislation today. i furthermore challenge the senate to share equally in our goal to balance our budget and ensure new programs are paid for. i urge a yes vote. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired. the gentleman from wisconsin. mr. ryan: i yield two minutes to the gentleman from california plrks campbell. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized for two minutes. mr. campbell: i thank the gentleman from wisconsin for yielding. pay-go is a sham. now that's a very strong word, but the facts to support it are equally strong. in the last congress, since democrats took control and pay-go was enacted, $420 billion of new spending was exempted from its provision. over the las

i support -- >> yield a minute to mr. boyd. >> thank you, dr. burgess, for yielding.he state of indiana in 1975, we became the first state of the union to enact comprehensive malpractice reforms it is called the indiana compensation act for patients it became a model for other states as it balanced the need for physicians for affordable liability insurance premiums with the need for patients for good access to all kinds of care. our law contains components very effective for three decades. our statute of limitations limits on recovery, patients compensation fund, a medical review panel and the limit on attorneys' fees. when you balance indiana's success, the state of indiana contiguous is very expense is city of practice medicine, meaning people who live in indiana have greater access to health care. now, when you think about the trends and jury awards and settlements, overall, 74% of the medical liability claims in 2004 were closed without payments to the plaintiff. the plaintiff lost a majority of the cases that went to the jury. of the 6% of the claims that went to

i support -- >> yield a minute to mr. boyd. >> thank you, dr. burgess, for yielding.in 1975, we became the first state of the union to enact comprehensive malpractice reforms it is called the indiana compensation act for patients it became a model for other states as it balanced the need for physicians for affordable liability insurance premiums with the need for patients for good access to all kinds of care. our law contains components very effective for three decades. our statute of limitations limits on recovery, patients compensation fund, a medical review panel and the limit on attorneys' fees. when you balance indiana's success, the state of indiana contiguous is very expense is city of practice medicine, meaning people who live in indiana have greater access to health care. now, when you think about the trends and jury awards and settlements, overall, 74% of the medical liability claims in 2004 were closed without payments to the plaintiff. the plaintiff lost a majority of the cases that went to the jury. of the 6% of the claims that went to a jury in 2004 to a