mr. boyer? mr. boyer, aye. mr. space? mr. space votes no. >> mr. who? >> mr.. >> will the clerk call the roll of those who have not responded to the vote? call the names of those who have not been recorded? >> mr. boucher, mr. engle. >> the clerk will call them. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i believe that's everyone, mr. chairman. >> any member wish to respond to the vote who has not voted? any member wish to change his or her vote? the clerk will tally the vote and report it. >> mr. chairman there were 28 ñ your bill all plans must comply with the government. >> i note the language does say by the federal government. you said to assume to comply with the government. >> the answer is yes? >> the private insurance company couldn't use this information either. >> great. >> gentleman will yield back. >> gentleman yield back. >> recognition to strike the requisite number of words. >> the gentleman is recognized. >> i would like the attention of the author of the amendment because this is friendly comment but as always when we're considering amendments, the devil i

so the ones that i believe that mr. boyeris asking be considered our eminent double 02 which is about the exemptions for veterans and members of the armed forces, and then a double 04 department of veterans affairs and the berman of defense health programs and an amendment 142 untitled the beginning to insert at the end of section 142. am i correct? >> 140 to be chemically have two copies, won 42 and one free to be. >> we believe they are identical. would you look at -- >> we have to insert in this act 140 to become a do you see that? >> prieta from using any funds in this act so when i asked for consideration of 142b, that is what i asked and that was one of the ones that was passed out fortunately. >> mr. boyer, 142 is too broad and get nervous about so if you'd be willing to withdraw in continue to talk about lettuce of center other two? >> we now what is in front of us, mr. chairman, it is 142b and restricted to this act and that is the language i had to put in. >> and try to avoid having to have the opposing ins. >> i do

mr. boyer? mr. boyer, aye. mr. space? mr. space votes no. >> mr. who? >> mr., aye. >> will the clerk call the roll of those who have not responded the vote? call the names of those who have not been recorded? >> mr. boucher, mr. engle. >> the clerk will call them. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i believe that's everyone, mr. chairman. >> any member wish to respond to the vote who has not voted? any member wish to change his or her vote? the clerk will tally the vote and report it. >> mr. chairman there were 28 yk >> republican congressman mike rogers offered an amendment that would leave treatment decisions up to patients and their doctors. this is 20 minutes. >> i think we can all agree that comparative effectiveness research can be a useful resource for doctors and their patients, but it should not be used as a tool to limit or deny coverage of treatments. this bill creates an entire new federal regime to conduct ce research. alarmingly, the bill has no restrictions on how the federal government can use this research. this is a dangerous open-door policy that w

mr. boyer. mr. boyer, aye. mr. pitts. mr. pitts, aye. mr. terry. mr. terry, aye. >> mr. rogers. mr. rogers, aye. mr. sullivan. mr. sullivan, aye. mr. murphy of pennsylvania. mr. murphy, aye. mr. burgess. mrs. blackburn. mrs. blackburn, aye. mrs. scolise, aye. mrs. christianson votes no. mr. rusch, no. mr. stupack, no. mr. doyle, mr. doyle, no. mr. marqui, no. mr. mathison. mr. mathison votes n@@@@@@@ @ @ cracks mr. ross folks know. >> have all members responded to the call of the role? this is an opportunity if anyone wishes to change his or her vote. the clerk will report the vote. vote. >> clerk will vote report the votes. >> 22 ayes, 32 noes. the amendment is not agreed to. you have an amendment at the desk. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i have an amendment at the desk. 06 069. >> may we get the decision on that amendment? it's either "a" or "b." it's to "b." >> to "b"? thank you. >> clerk will report the amendment. >> young lady is recognized for five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman. my colleague is a clarification of medicaid coverage for citizens of freely associated states.

. >> mr. boyer? >> madame secretary, what type of revenue enhancers' have been discussed? >> at this point, the president has proposed a return to the itemized deduction that was present in the days of ronald reagan. he feels that would be a way to raise revenue. >> $340 billion? >> what are other ideas that have been discussed? >> that is the revenue in hansard that has been discussed. >> that is 340 billion. >> that is the revenue in hansard that the president has discussed. he has proposed over $660 billion worth of savings. we are about just under one trillion dollars. >> and we are still looking for another 200 and -- another two trillion dollars. i am not really prepared to talk about a three trillion dollar bill. >> who would that impact? >> it would impact the wealthiest americans who are currently paying a different level of tax rate on their itemized deduction than middle income americans. >> and that would be set at what? at what adjusted gross income level would that be said? >> >> it is my understanding that it was over to -- that it was over $200,000. " what

. >> why don't you yield to mr. boyer in fact, we're going to have the center for quality improvement that will set, quote, best practices, will it be setting standards and thereby having an impact upon medical liability that uses community standards? >> mr. buyer, the provision in this section is to identify best practices. it does not have an ability to set enforceable standards for any practitioner. nor does it have the authority to set community standards for liability concerns. there's research to figure out best practices. >> i think that's helpful to us. none of us want anything to come between our doctor and a patient ore ourselves. and that's what mr. gingrey is about. we don't want there to be a government board that's going to mandate these standards. you're telling me that's not in this law. well, then everybody should support gingrey's amendment. >> i'm not going to yield back to anybody else. i just want to simply close with rereading this. nothing in this section shall be construed to allow any federal arch

. >> who is our next democrat practice [inaudible conversations] mr. boyer, you have an amendment? do. i have a three amendments and i asked that they all be considered in block. one would-be boyer number 142. the other would be -- i think it is 142b, do have that won? and the other is 002 in the other is 004. [inaudible conversations] >> mr. chairman, can i reserve reports of order. king that the gentleman from new jersey reserves a point of order. >> [inaudible conversations] >> if the gentleman would permit, we are being told by our staff we have another chance to read them yet, and why don't we take them up and reserve the question of unblocking them, but i don't know why i wouldn't, but let's just don't bother to read what i suspend, put them in and block form and ledger sat take a look at them and i'd be more than happy to speak with them and lead to -- i will suspend the offering of those amendments until i working out with chairman. >> thank you. [inaudible conversations] mr. wiener. [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] the chair recognizes and eshoo from cal