mr. brooks. public comment is now closed. i'd like to make a motion to move this with a positive recommendation. >>> second. >> chairwoman: seconded. take that without objection. thank you very much. good work. and mr. clerk, will you please call item number six. >> item number six is the executive officer's report. >> chairwoman: mar global, havmr. global, you havea presentation for us? >> yes. thank you. i have a couple of items. i would like to give you an update on the budget and fundraising progress for our study of on-demand workers. the team is putting together a revised budget, and it is very possible that the budget is going to increase -- actually, we're hoping it will increase and be somewhere in the neighborhood of $450,000. we have been planning and seeking funds for a budget of $300,000. why the higher cost? it has to do with the options that they're considering for the survey. the first option would be an online survey. and there are some pluses and minuses to it. it would cost less, but the downside is they rea

mr. brooks." a woman called the attacks cowardly, to eat a man, on art -- to beat a man unarmed and down. herchallenge brooks to meet anywhere with pistols, rifles, or cow hides. the outrage had no bearing on her sex. that she was 50 years old and a widow. she had lost two sons and the mexican war and brooks action represented a direct affront to our own liberty, a liberty that she believed her country should protect. she said "now then, mr. brooks, let's see some of your courage. you are afraid to meet a man. dare you meet a woman?" she said that she was ready to do her country service by whipping what she called the cowardly ruffian. more than any other man, she admitted to what she was willing to do publicly. well many were praying for sumner, robinson demonstrated with ae was ready to do pistol. i like this. there is no anonymity. she puts her name on it, first name, last name, her age. she lets them know who she is. she was publicly challenging senator brooks and even taunting him. she wrote w

over kashmir i'm joined now here at the big table by south asian political analyst boris will come mr brooke it's good to have you on the show. what's what's going on here i mean this special status had been in place for 7 decades right doesn't it and now india has decided to revoke it why now. well i think it's a 2nd i mean this prime minister modi's and then simply put he has just won his 2nd term in office and he he wants to implement the b j p agenda of the party is his party's agenda he promised in his campaign to do just that it's a long standing demand of b j p that the article 370 should be scrapped and so he's just fulfilling the agenda and the promises. and putting the country on a conflict course with pakistan you know not only of the country i think it's a regional issue we have seen today also a statement by china because china sees itself also involved as a party to this conflict so it's not a yeah it's not a 2 party conflict in a way it was a 3 party conflict and what happens if pakistan as we heard in the report pakistan may take this to the un security council what will that

mr. brooks. mrs. amelia rn robinson called the attacks cowardly , to beat him an unarmed and down. she referred to brooks as a cringing puppy who she would gladly challenge to meet her any place with pistols, rifles or cowhide. the outrage felt had no bearing on her sex and she like other black leaders was exasperated by the sacrifices and she was 50 years old, a widow, she lost two sons in the mexican war and her actions represented a direct affront to her own liberty liberty she believed the country should protect. now then mr. brooks robinson challenge, to see some of your posted courage. you are afraid to meet a man could do you meet a woman. robinson declared that she was anxious to do her country some service, either by ripping or choking the cowardly ruffian who threatened what she perceived as america's most precious right to freedom of speech. robinson was willing to put strong words into print and takes her disdain for carting the attack for sumner. more than any other man she admitted to what she was willing to do public. while many were praying for sumner , robinson illu

mr. brooks, good to see you. >> good to see you all, too. eric brooks, san francisco clean energy advocates and californians for energy choice. so just to kind of reiterate where i've said before, if i were the head of the s.f. p.u.c., and the power enterprise, that is the plan i would put together because the p.u.c. is an enterprise department that is supposed to focus mainly on a conservative approach and protect rate-payers. so there is nothing wrong with what the s.f. p.u.c. just showed to you. but it shows that. s.f. p.u.c. is not the place where we're going to get a city build-out that will reverse the climate crisis. produced locally and regionly by 2030, which is what it is going to take to overcome the crisis. when ab117 was created, it put the elected body in charge of the program, and that's the clean s.f. board of supervisors. that's where we need a city-wide buildout plan to come from. it is so important that you hire a contractor as soon as you can so we can get that plan planned out so that we don't have to try to put a square

mr. brooks." ms. amelia robinson called the attacks cowardly, to beat a man unarmed and down. she referred to brooks as a cringing puppy, who she would gladly challenge to meet her any place with pistols, rifles or cowhides. the outrage had no bearing on her sex. she like other black leaders was exasperated by the sacrifices that cost her dearly. she was 50 years old and a widow. she lost two sons in the mexican/american war. quote, well rk let us see some boasted courage. you are afraid to meet a man. dare you meet a woman. robinson declared that she was anxious to do her country some service either by whipping or choking the coward lly roughian. she was willing to put her strong words into print and expose her disdain regarding the attack for sumner. much is revealed by robinson's remarks. she was publicly challenging senator brooks and even taunting him. she wrote with rage that signalled she had little to lose. the fact that sumner was immobilized from most of the beating under his desk was perhaps the greatest act of cowardice on brook's part. she claimed she would even wh

mr. brooks, i'm brian banks. >> oh, yeah.ters, plural, right? brian, look, we only work with wrongly imprisoned people. >> i was wrongly imprisoned. >> i know, i know. you're out now. and you took a plea. >> i only took a plea -- >> that's okay. you didn't go to trial, so you can't appeal. there's nothing you can do. >> there's always something you can do. >> greg kinnear joins us at the table. good morning. a long ways from the days of "talk soup." i remember watching that. >> the bright light? got a table here. >> brian banks was at the table not too long ago telling his story six or seven years ago. it's a true story and a special story when you consider the timing as we just talked about cyntoia broin who was released from prison today. but you did heavier. in terms of getting to know this character. you sat in on some of those law classes from justin brooks at california western. why was that so important, and what more did you do to propair for this role? >> you know, justin, in addition to starting a program that has e

mr. kiko: i don't really know. rep. brooks: or even when we are not here, when we are not here is a great opportunity when we are back in district or vice versa for those. householder and mr. shapiro, i want to ask you about training.n time what kind of training do you have in mind? iu have the orientation, and applaud mr. kiko for doing the staff training and all of that -- what kind of just in time training would you all give that is incredibly adventitious to us -- advantageous to us? training --ind of it is like the only training we have to do besides computer security training. do we even do that? we do not even do that. i did that at the justice department. any just-in-time's that we ought to be doing? well, i mentioned appropriations, and there is a range of skill sets that members understanding the appropriations process, they need to understand the budget is aess, and there range of issues and it's -- this gets back to meeting the needs of members and i think the just-in-time is what is critical then, members, if it i

mr. smoot. >> reporter: jolley argued if brooke was so afraid of smoot why would she want to keep seeingwed she was the one who called him that day. >> she continued to treat shawn as a friend. as someone that she would do activities with. >> reporter: did you worry that that could be confusing to the jury? >> absolutely. and i think that's the underlying question anytime that we're talking about domestic violence. why does anyone go back? >> reporter: the prosecutors hoped any doubt the jury may have regarding smoot's guilt would be w >> do you swear the testimony you're about to give will be the truth -- >> reporter: amy denlinger, who was working for smoot when brooke was murdered, says her impression of the nice outgoing man who hired her didn't last. why did it change? >> he was cold. he got angry easily. not satisfied, really, ever. it almost seemed like he enjoyed getting somebody riled up. >> reporter: in court she testified about what happened the monday following brooke's murder. >> now, on that day did mr. smoot come into the office? >> he came in that morning. when i saw him

mr. trump expect? >> reporter: well, brook, there are reports of expected protests in both cities where emotions are still so raw. here in dayton we watched community members experience intense pain and grief over the massacre, but we've also seen frustration and anger and demands for gun safety. president trump is flying to dayton, ohio, and then el paso, texas, two communities grieving from this weekend's mass shootings that killed more than 30 people. >> what he wants to do is go to these communities and grieve with them, pray with them, offer condolences. >> reporter: this trip is not without controversy. president trump's rhetoric has been divisive. >> this is an invasion. >> reporter: people in both cities question if she should fill his role as comforter in chief. >> may god bless them in toledo. >> reporter: beyond the name mixup, the mayor says the president's comments have fallen short. >> his rhetoric has been painful for many in our community, and i think people should stand up and say they're not happy if they're not happy he's coming. >> reporter: late last night in a twitter back-and-forth,

we are joined by brooke sullivan in new york and kristine aquino with nejra cehic. let's start with argentina's shock, a big defeat for mr. macri in the primaries that suggests he may not get reelected. brooke: a real surprise here. i think people were expecting macri and fernandez to get into a run-up situation. now he may be looking at a straight outright victory, which is a real change in expectations. there was a really interesting bloomberg news story about how this is another election pollsters have gotten wrong. are we reaching a port where you can't necessarily predict to the outcome? we just don't know how this is going to play out. nejra: if we do see an ugly monday for argentine assets, is this actually a possibility that it could change the way voters vote, and doesn't necessarily we will see a loss for macri? would be onet possibility, but at least in the short term, the main concern for investors and voters in general would be how much damage is there going to be in argentine markets, and especially at a time this year, the summertime, liquidity is not that great, so it is a dangerous time for big moves in

brooke, a very similar theme here in el paso. signs are posted alongside the memorial, one of them reads "mr. t, don't invade our city," a phrase we heard from both the president and the el paso shooter when talking about undocumented inl grants, invasions. the president put a target on the city, one tells cnn, and now he needs, in his words, to peel it off. we'll have much more on that as it develops the next couple of hours. first back to you. >> bringing coverage from both of these cities. i want to start in dayton. cnn white house correspondent kaitlan collins is with me. it's your job to cover the president each and every day. he's here. he's over at the hospital. i saw the helicopters. tell me who he's meeting with and what his message is. >> he's following a path too many times, comes into these cities, tiply goes to the hospitals where some of the vics are being treated, where they've gone. he meets with law enforcement, first responders, at the miami valley hospital right now. it's less than a mile way from this bar where these nine people were shot and killed. interestingly enough,

brooks, five minutes. >> thank you. thank you mr. chairman. i too apologize. i have been running between a couple of different hearings, but what's been pretty clear to me is that there is not a lot of agreement from the panel, and so i guess i'd like to -- >> there's a big surprise. >> i would like to start out by asking and because i've kind of gone in and out of this hearing, senator smith, could you please share with us -- and i apologize if this has been asked -- can you explain how retransmission consent prices are actually decided because as i have come in and out of this, that seems to be the sticking point or one of sticking points. can you talk about how those prices get decided? >> obviously i don't negotiate them and if mr. thun and i did, i'm sure we would come up with a deal. their business people and our business people, my members, they sit down and negotiate, and i would just make the point that they pay for their own content, far more than they pay for ours which is much higher watched. so our members try to get the dollars reflected by the e

brooke. >> so your reaction when he said that back to you? >> well, you know, it was a little surprising to hear mr actually revise emma lazarus' poem on the spot in realtime. but obviously, president trump has made illegal immigration a key part of his platform and his time in the white house. i think what's notable here is this is about legal immigration. this is about people who came to this country, did everything right. crossed their ts, dotted their is. they're working in some cases. as was illustrated in that clip and can't make ends meet for whatever reason for a couple of months a year, perhaps, need to get on public assistance. that's now going to be a major ding against them. their application for a green card can either be delay ordinary outright revoked. and that is a substantial change in how the u.s. government has determined who gets to be an american citizen. >> well, there is now more to this conversation you had with ken cuccinelli, because the president of the united states was just asked about his comments to you. here he was. >> i am tired of seeing our taxpayers paying for pe

mr. vice president, when you announced the orion crew capsule complete with the european service module, we are very close to shipping that up to plum brook station where it will be tested, thermal vacuum testing as well as emi testing. all of those very exciting activities are underway. we also, since the last national space council, we have gone under contract for the first element of the gateway, the power and proportional element, solar electric propulsion for that reusable command module in and around the moon for the next 15 years, so that is a great development. and by the way, the reason that was able to go so fast, mr. vice president, is because of the charge to be ready by 2024, to land not just the next man but also the first woman on the south pole of the moon. that charge is really what changed the dynamic to make that go so fast, that acquisition element. on that gateway we are moving as fast as we can, rapid acquisition is what we call a minihab, just a small habitation module attached to the propulsion. it is not the long-term solution but that is what will help get our astronauts on the orion into a lander and land on the

mr. neumann. david: and next we will find out how much it is worth. the third company is facebook for not a good reason. joining us is brooke sutherland.in reaction is, what? why are they doing this? listening in on people's messages and transcribing them? brooke: it just sort of make you want to pull your hair out. it is an option people opted into on facebook messenger to have their audio conversations transcribed. facebook is supposed to be using artificial intelligence to do that, but was outsourcing to third parties to have them fact checked the artificial intelligence and make sure they were getting it right. i love about the story is facebook commented to say no, we stop to this more than a week ago. more than a week ago? that is after the settlement over privacy concerns, well into a lot of the criticism over facebook after mark zuckerberg went to congress. why are we still finding out about these things? david: and it came to light the freelancers they were hiring felt it was unethical and complained about it, like, we are not comfortable listening to these conversations. brooke: because they felt the humans didn't -- they fel

mr. mccarthy? >> we have i would disclose the total amount of rebates we pay. >> appreciate that. thanks for the time. >> the gentleman yield back. now i have the pleasure of recognizing the gentlewoman from indiana, ms. brooks. >> thank you, madam chairwoman. i'm going to continue on my colic from across the aisle questions about the pricing, specifically, and what to focus on the lowest net cost. so while he focus on the list price, ms. bricker and mr. eberle, can you tell us how you determine lowest net cost? >> we take the list price last in a discount that's by the manufacturer. >> mr. eberle? >> very similar. it does ver vary by brand and generic generics, there are not rebates and units we're looking at what the pricing of the generic is available in the marketplace so we do surveys to determine what pharmacies are buying that drug for. we look at that on the brand drug that rebated com, it's thet price minus any rebates, discounts we received for manufacturers and pharmacies. that combined, that sets the net cost. we look at things in terms of clinical value, how does the cost and value compare. >> we heard earlier testimony about administrative fees. i believe pharmaceutical companies talk about adm