mr. bruno -- i'd like to call up the appellant, mark bruno and save north beach to describe to us the grounds of their appeal. >> my name is mark bruno and i am the appellant in this matter. as many of you have seen before, i will place it here but you will see more details about this notice of public hearing. we see them all the time in our world, especially yours because it's how we rely on telling our constituents and our friends and our neighbors and fellow citizens of san francisco about something important happening in their lives. this was given to us here in north beach. >> it's upside down. >> i just got out of a medical hearing and i feel upside down. if yo you have to interrupt me, please feel free. i'm hoping not to take 10 minutes. our argument is simple. when da dan mackarini came to me following this hearing on may 16th, and he and i filed an appeal on june 15th, 30 days following this hearing on may 16th, the last day possible, that we did what was proper, what was called for an

just keeping in mind, mr. bruno, you have three minutes. >> thank you all for allowing us to come here today with this project which is much importance to us in north beach. you've seen fantastic people from north beach on both sides of the very important issue. that's why, as legislators, it's so important to be fair referees to offer an administrative process that is fair and neutral. let me read you something from the administrative code. i'm sorry to bore you with the administrative code, the last thing you wanted to hear someone talk about was the administrative code. we have someone and i apologize for not recalling the representative's name from the planning department but she stated it's the tradition or the practice of the senior planning and the environmental control officer to do something. that's something something was what? it was like, oh, well when the project of a whole is considered and the project is considered as this whole, it's nothing about that in the administrative code. what the administrat

mrs. bruno's appeal but i also wanted to say i object to the whole project for many different reasons. at the last -- there were no public meetings about close the park, built irrigation system and about adding a seemingly at the last minute that this cement sidewalks around the park were just thrown in on top of it. this is the a whole separate project of the there was no public hearing about it. at first, it was said it would be completed in six months by mr. conner and then it was a year or less and now the history of the m.t.a. is such that i doubt very many people truly believe that two separate projects involving closing the park, could be completed within a year. also, it seems that an easterly

and, so, mr. bruno with his pastor and church friends and community went to the facility, along with his son, and as he filled out the paperwork, that's when plainclothes members of the ice team entered the room, tackled the man, took him to the ground, put him in a van and were ready to deport him to mexico. the van was surrounded by the church members who stand in solidarity with him as well as the two of us that represent that area in congress. and we are going to continue to insist that deferred action be granted to this man based on humanitarian reasons and the fact he has been law-abiding and in the country now for two and a half years. >> let me go to you because you again were pivotal in getting him into that church where he was taking sanctuary in the first place. ice issued a statement saying in part he is a convicted criminal who has received all appropriate legal process under federal law, has no outstanding appeal and has no legal basis to remain in the u.s. so why did mr. oliver bruno take

mr. lemaire. >> he was very open on stage, and we had an opportunity to catch up with bruno lemaire, he did said he wanted a smooth process of brexit, that that would be good for europe keep in mind that let's go back to where the french started. they wanted to extract blood effectively from the uk in this process. they wanted to send a message to europe that exit at your peril they wanted the toughest possible deal. just some comments in the last couple of months saying any decision that leaves european citizens with the impression that you can leave the european union and keep all of the adv t advantages would be suicidal when i caught up with bruno lemaire on stage, i asked if this deal was suicidal for the uk >> the british people decided to go out of the eu i would think it was histoa mis. that's the sovereign choice of the british people now we have to take into account the consequences of that choice. you cannot be out of the european states, out of the european union and keep all the benefits of being in the european union either you're out or you're in but you can't be in, you can't be

finance minister, bruno lemaire, says japan and france will push ahead with the consolidation between renault and nissan he added he still needs to see evidence of the allegations against mr. ghosn. julianna is at the renault headquarters outside of paris and has been monitoring events what is the latest >> a fast-moving story, and your recap of the board meeting last night was great. putting it all together, renault is taking an innocent until proven guilty approach this draws stark contrast to the comments out of nissan earlier this week with the ceo explicitly putting blame and guilt on to carlos ghosn and calling for his immediate dismissal this thursday at an egm in japan now the french government owns 15% of rerenault their thoughts on the matter are crucial. this morning bruno lemaire held a press conference in paris and echoed the thoughts of renault and said there is no proof of wrongdoing at this point i would just say bear in mind that nissan has been sitting on this story for a number of months they've been running their own internal investigation renault just entered the picture this week. so we're looking at a different time frame and a different amount of i