mr. buckley has tried to get their money back by building a house that is ridiculous the outsized for the rest of the neighborhood. if any of you lived on this treaty would be standing there saying the same thing i was not notified of the second go around with this. i went through the first one i just object to the entire process. if you're going to open it up to another d.r., that would be great. but the fact is, you are dropping this down into eight -- this bloated thing down into a quiet neighborhood. it is just wrong. consider the neighborhood. look at the pictures she presented and put this thing in the middle of it. it is shameful. i thank you very much for your time. >> did you respond at all to the notice of proposal that was sent out in july? but the first time when we went through this when it was mr. lee proposing the project, the fellow that is third there in line -- >> i am talking the more recent. >> i was not notified of it. what i did mine, 300 ft.. we had to send it out to the people on the next street, across the street come up and down the street. it is just not the sam

i think you do want to strike it all down to avoid a readout of buckley i reserve the remainder of my time. >> thank you, mr. clement. >> thank you, mr. chief justice. may it please the court? there should be no occasion to consider issues of severability because as we argue, the minimum coverage provision fully consistent with article i of the constitution. but if the court were to conclude otherwise, it should reject progression or sweeping proposition the entire act must fall if one provision is held unconstitutional. as an initial matter, we believe the court should not even consider that question. the vast majority of the provisions of this act do not even apply to petitioners, but instead millions of citizens and businesses who are not before the court. how does your proposal actually were? your ideas when they take care of it themselves, do contemplate them bringing litigation? insane i guess the insurers are the most obvious ones without the mandate, the whole thing falls apart that we will bear peter krause. so the rest of the law should be struck down. that's all another line of litigation. >> i t