mr. buehler you have a comment. >> good afternoon, commissioners i'm sorry to be late for this item i wanted to refer back to the discussion regarding compliance with the standards i agree with that interpretation there's a difference between contains and whether or not there's a significant impact, however, the recommendations of the sequa 12 and 13 and 16 are an effort to encourage good behavior with the secretary standards. in this gray area of compliance with the standards and significant adverse impact many on the task force expressed concerns about the cost establishing whether or not there's a significant adverse impact if you don't comply with the standards. the example raised by sarah the demolition in the historic district this attempts to provide guidelines, however, there's no easy kind of rule of thumb percentage for example of buildings that must remain in the district to retain their eligibility and integrity. the members of the task force felt the safe harbor there is in terms of saving time for the sequa proposals >> thank you. commissioners any other questions >> i'm going