mr. butler? can we see that? can you walk us through that, please? >> talking about the section with the 45 degree angles? >> yes. >> that's it. we have the issue with lynch and with several others. >> the rear yard of the building should be- >> could you pull it down so we can see it? pull the drawing down-there you go. >> this st. the actual requires rear yard depth, 25 percent of the lot width and 45 degree angle back to existing 3 story buildings shows it complying with the courtyard space. likewise, when you are back at the line of the variance, the 45 degree exposure also works for the other side when the third floor is set back away fwraum the variance line. >> how much? >> you can see coming out of the roof looks like to be about 9 to 10 feet back. that footprint of the back building i believe is 41 feet in depth and if it respected the rear yard it would be 32 feet in depth. i bleechb those are the numbers plus or minus. they have a 32 foot buildable envelope at the back but want 41. >> 9 foot off the top floor >> 15 from the front and have

mr. butler did that constituent that can be done unless conditioned to one or the other. >> commissioner johnson. >> okay i can make away the condition of the grass railing from my motion i added it in your renderings transparent or glass railing on the stairs in our revised staircase but i'll takeaway that the project sponsor to continue to work with the staff on the detailing of both the elevator and the railing because i agree if you put in a glass elevator maybe consistent to put in glass railing but if you didn't would be out of context. >> jonas did you get that and one note on pulling 9 railing away from the property lines normally i can go along with the change it's not warned with the roof deck to another roof deck to the property lines and one not used on the other side i don't know what it gets us when i support that we're looking at rh1 and pushing back the roof deck give us more open space this is not doing that i'm not seeing why that change wasn't what that would be in furtherance of this project. >> commissioner moore. >> i'd like to ask you - e - glass elevators with not

mr. butler let's go ahead and move into the public comment. anyone wish to comment - that would like to speak please come up and do so on item 2. >> hi my name is a neeley work for the ocean avenue association so we're working on projects and most of them relate to smaller buildings for retail use or other community we have lookers-on ocean avenue that stands out with the theatre building on the 1900 of the avenue near the medical building inside and out this is a special building we urge you to support this landmarking decision and thank by heritage and the landmarking expert in planning and that sproefz thank you very much. >> anyone else public comment is closed. >> i'll say i'll delighted to see that the landmarking experts in the planning department staff is coming together it is a fantastic building as a child i remember the gym i'm happy to see that it will be designated and preserved colleagues - mr. commissioner peskin. >> make a madam chair an amendment to be little the ordinance to address section 302 finding i can have someone brin

mr. butler and [inaudible] whether we are in the range where ubelieve there is a commize. i want to make sure we are not and what we are doing is 5 dr requests having different objectives we are not simplifying. there is a tendency we may simplify. could you please respond? >> the little house committee would support that motion. >> agreed. >> i second. >> very good commissioners shall i call the question? >> hang on a second. >> i would agree with the motion also with the other dr requesters. >> do you fully understand what we are proposing here? >> i think we have a good understanding and we are hearing the commission and i think you have seen dana up gibbing up the entire forth floor of union street. again, lets focus on give and take. we are compfortable with 5 feet off the top floor on the rear building. we are only deal wg 27 foot depth so cut 9 feet out. is this bigger than my bedroom? yes. is this new construction? do they want to do something nice, yes. not to say 20 or 19 feet isn't something that could work but we are saying we are willing to cut the forth story

mr. butler let's go ahead and move into the public comment. anyone wish to comment - that would like to speak please come up and do so on item 2. >> hi my name is a neeley work for the ocean avenue association so we're working on projects and most of them relate to smaller buildings for retail use or other community we have lookers-on ocean avenue that stands out with the theatre building on the 1900 of the avenue near the medical building inside and out this is a special building we urge you to support this landmarking decision and thank by heritage and the landmarking expert in planning and that sproefz thank you very much. >> anyone else public comment is closed. >> i'll say i'll delighted to see that the landmarking experts in the planning department staff is coming together it is a fantastic building as a child i remember the gym i'm happy to see that it will be designated and preserved colleagues - mr. commissioner peskin. >> make a madam chair an amendment to be little the ordinance to address section 302 finding i can have someone brin

mr. butler let's go ahead and move into the public comment. anyone wish to comment - that would like to speak please come up and do so on item 2. >> hi my name is a neeley work for the ocean avenue association so we're working on projects and most of them relate to smaller buildings for retail use or other community we have lookers-on ocean avenue that stands out with the theatre building on the 1900 of the avenue near the medical building inside and out this is a special building we urge you to support this landmarking decision and thank by heritage and the landmarking expert in planning and that sproefz thank you very much. >> anyone else public comment is closed. >> i'll say i'll delighted to see that the landmarking experts in the planning department staff is coming together it is a fantastic building as a child i remember the gym i'm happy to see that it will be designated and preserved colleagues - mr. commissioner peskin. >> make a madam chair an amendment to be little the ordinance to address section 302 finding i can have someone brin

mr. butler has presented before you and to consider their project. know it's a great challenge where you have neighbors who are opposing it but we have to have some normal guidelines to go by . to help families remain in the city. it is a real challenge and i have seen this over the past three decades. thank you for your time. >> be thanks. any other speakers in support of the project sponsor? dr requester, you have a two-minute rebuttal. >> i'm just going take a second. i appreciate the fact that real estate agent wants to sell property. but i don't think it is pertinent to what we are talking about today. mr. butler was correct. as i mentioned, actually, rdt did consider this more than once. but i was talking about was their final decision when they took a good look at the situation that is what we are asking for. john? >> i just want to point out that there are a total 54 houses in a midblock open space and starting here there's 39 of them identical that were built by herman christiansen in 1939. there are 15 houses in this midblock open space tha

mr. butler let's go ahead and move into the public comment. anyone wish to comment - that would like to speak please come up and do so on item 2. >> hi my name is a neeley work for the ocean avenue association so we're working on projects and most of them relate to smaller buildings for retail use or other community we have lookers-on ocean avenue that stands out with the theatre building on the 1900 of the avenue near the medical building inside and out this is a special building we urge you to support this landmarking decision and thank by heritage and the landmarking expert in planning and that sproefz thank you very much. >> anyone else public comment is closed. >> i'll say i'll delighted to see that the landmarking experts in the planning department staff is coming together it is a fantastic building as a child i remember the gym i'm happy to see that it will be designated and preserved colleagues - mr. commissioner peskin. >> make a madam chair an amendment to be little the ordinance to address section 302 finding i can have someone brin

mr. butler owe represent the this house committee for the dr and variance application we oppose the variancespplied for their without hardship and materially and enjuris to the project as you consider the project you should know about the players and the larger moves yet to be played on many unwelling chest board the project manager is - his father owns four lots and doing two projects on more this will have bigger repercussions it's fathers make no mistake we're friends of owners but the fabricate that owns the 4 properties on the block his son has positions as a curator of luxury housing in san francisco as well as agents rolling russel are serial erect oversees from oakland and share nine hundred and 55 evictions between them they and so forth to have the delipidated building and boosts of a multi if i may dispositioning that is ellis act but make no mistake about who's hidden the curtain and with the so many lots in play in the ultimately luxury for the most part the sponsors give you a little bit of background janlt building and lightwells and local scale they put in modern architecture

mr. butler let's go ahead and move into the public comment. anyone wish to comment - that would like to speak please come up and do so on item 2. >> hi my name is a neeley work for the ocean avenue association so we're working on projects and most of them relate to smaller buildings for retail use or other community we have lookers-on ocean avenue that stands out with the theatre building on the 1900 of the avenue near the medical building inside and out this is a special building we urge you to support this landmarking decision and thank by heritage and the landmarking expert in planning and that sproefz thank you very much. >> anyone else public comment is closed. >> i'll say i'll delighted to see that the landmarking experts in the planning department staff is coming together it is a fantastic building as a child i remember the gym i'm happy to see that it will be designated and preserved colleagues - mr. commissioner peskin. >> make a madam chair an amendment to be little the ordinance to address section 302 finding i can have someone brin

mr. trump never treated a woman like that. >> the butler?> absolutely. >> she doesn't say the butler saw trump trying to shove his tongue down her throat. trump looked at her and said have you ever been for steaks, i'll take you. we're going to have an affair, i'm telling you. he said you remember, best sex i ever had. it's very detailed. i mean i'm not saying it ie true. i don't know whether it's true or not true. but it's certainly very detailed, is it not in. >> just like within the last hour one of the other women has already changed her story. no it's definitely not true or true. mr. trump denied this. i take him at his word. >> why don't you take him at his word on the bus where he says he does do this in. >> because that was on a hollywood access bus, he was with another guy doing what guys do. whether you like it or not, that's how it happens. >> the fact that they were having a private conversation leads many to believe that what he said was true. this is guy to guy -- >> no, megyn. two guys talking about girls one upping each other

and i was grateful when trump's long-time butler burst into the room a minute later as i tried to unpin myself. this writer ends her piece with for the record, mr. trump, i did not consent." >> on the website site of people magazine by one of its journalist, we want to bring in a.j. delgado. a.j. you have the task of issuing the first defense and what is your reaction and defense to these varied charges we've laid out tonight? >> i'm quite angry to read about them. not only do i find them credible i'll explain why but angry on a personal level having to been around mr. trump gotten to know mr. trump, somebody who has experienced racism, i was drawn to his candidacy in elevating women in the work place, that really touched me but having gotten to know him knowing there are women smearing him with these false allegations is something that angers me on a personal level. as a woman sexual assault having experienced it myself is a very, very serious matter and to trivialize it it is downright sickening, for america, not just mr. trump, but america when we are trivializing sexual assault in this way. >> is his answer to anderson cooper, does that sti

butler was in the with them in that room the entire time. he walked into the room, he didn't see anything. that doesn't disprove anything. >> these people didn't come out when mr. trump was running "the apprentice". they can't come forward when he announced. when he won the nomination. >> they came forward after he said he likes to grab them by the crotch and denied he'd done it. >> they came forward, with effort of swinging this election. >> jason, eric trump is speaking to eric hummer. >> he did a great job. he brought the case to her. he talked about many short comings, frankly, moderators won't talk about in the past he talked about tonight. i think he brought the case to her and how america has been bailing and left behind. it's left many citizens behind. and we need to get our country back. we need to get our deficit in control and we need to take education back. we have to stop the really bad trade deals that put our country at a huge disadvantage. we have to bring jobs back to our nation. >> what is the intention of not answering a question about a fair election in america this year? >> when you look at the main stream media, the way they've been cover