mr. calabria of the cato institute. he commented that paul samuelsson, the noted former economist and professor at m.i.t., i believe, predicted that cutting spending in 1946 by 40% would cause another recession or depression. instead, the economy grew by 10%. i found that comment very interesting. i was wondering if mr. calabria if he knows, and i assume he does, what professor samuel attempted to explain his error. and if so, was it in terms of the decrease in military spending at the end of the war, world war ii, or pent up consumer demand. i would be very interesting in your comments in that regard. >> go ahead. >> thank you, george. that was military spending and demobilization. obviously i was not there at the time. that's fair to say, despite a couple of gray hairs. there wouldn't be jobs. there wouldn't be sufficient demand. there was rationing. that was a widely held view in the economics recession. and there was concern the economy would not be able to handle all the soldiers coming home. in that time there was