mr. cantor: what can the american people or -- ms.pton: get past this period of dysfunction and hostility? mr. cantor: well, certainly if you look from the leadership level in terms of legislative bodies at the state level or in congress, i always say, we need to start -- we need to start seeing the practice of winning together again. and so at the legislative level, if you take an issue that may not be the sexiest or most consequential issue but, again, establish a pattern of working together, as i was saying earlier, it could really go a long way. we got to start go back the seeds of -- planting those seeds again. i think it is about re-establishing some norms or stop trying to go in and break up the norms every single day we wake up. because there's actually some value in some of these institutions that have developed, and they have developed based on what the subject of these several days are here in williamsburg celebrating jamestown, it is those pillars of democracy, that balance of power, the notion that we don't want mob rule,

mr. cantor: i don't this is where government will do it.t will be obsolete as government does something. i believe we have found ways going back to the kind of disruptive technology way back when centuries ago that society figured out a way to hold people account. i think it will be more market-based. you already got people out there now taking algorithms and trying to assess veracity and i think you will have a system that will develop out of the market. anytime the government gets involved, you start picking winners and losers. ms. hutchinson: two things can be true at the exact same time. you can have guardrails that got -- guardrails that ought and must do. all of our conversations need to be either/or, these are the things we must act. mr. cantor: government needs to require transparency. >> i am with tony on this. one of the largest twitter accounts hacked in the election was tennessee republicans, which was being run out of st. petersburg. our government did not find out about it until afterwards. the private sector -- they were the

mr. cantor ignored my request for a light well.nclusion -- the thoroughly documented and proper procedures and misrepresentations to city staff, and neighbors, the massive size of the proposed houses and inappropriate design, for example the faÇade of house number 27 with its commercial glass canopy, demonstrate little consideration for the neighbors. please deny this bond as a request to go forward with these plans. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> my name is josiah clark. i wanted to thank you all for being here. your patients on ability to focus after so many hours of this every day. i have lived at 1628 lake street my whole life. our house was built to in 1896. it shares a backyard property line with lot 21. i oppose this project because both of these proposed houses are out of scale with houses on the block and significantly reduce the mid block open space shared with homes on 17th and 18th avenue and on lake street. the open space would be entirely removed. according to the proposed plans removing a wall of s

mr. cantor did, miss taylor did, and i want to say they made it a better project. this neighborhood involvement made this a better project. let me say a few words about what my mayor said, and it is the history of the embarcadero freeway which was, by all accounts, a terrible urban planning mistake. and then, in 1989, after the loma prieta earthquake, we had a mayor who had the courage to rip that thing down. and by the time then-state senator quentin kopp transferred the property to the city for one american dollar, willie brown was mayor. and there was a little neighborhood fight about what we were going to do with those parcels. one was going to be a police station, one was going to be a butterfly museum, one was going to be affordable housing. i am pleased to say that today, they are all affordable housing for the city and county of san francisco. that is remarkable. [applause] >> supervisor peskin: now, it is true that i wanted this site, even though my friends at the barbary coast neighbors disagreed, i wanted this to be a temporary navigation site. but the m

mr. cantor. like to talk to you for a minute. 2013 after the sandy hook shooting he wrote a piece titled the responsibility of leadership and the fraternal order of police journal. you stated the fo ps a standing resolution one that was passed at the 1993 national conference to support the assault weapons ban passed by congress in 1994. are you personally supportive of an assault weapons ban? >> our last national conference the delegates overturn that standing rule and is an advocate for the fob it's been my position that i support what the members voted on. as atf director looking through a different lens i would much prefer to talk with the expert witnesses that atf and the other professional staff before i would render an opinion on the ban. as a law enforcement professional mike job would be to enforce the law. >> if i understand you correct do you are saying your position is consistent with and materially indistinguishable from the fob? >> is that folks be -- apple pay presents my job to be

. >> former house majority leader eric cantor and two former governor's joint mr. rove at the forum. you can watch monday night at 9:30 eastern. >> next, a roundup of events in the latest session of australia's parliament. political reporter annalise nielsen hosted the event looking at australian prime minister scott morrison and members of his cabinet answering questions on national security. detention of undocumented immigrants, and relations with the u.s. from sky news, this is 30 minutes. ♪ annelise: hello, and welcome to question time wrap where we look at the first sitting fortnight of the new morrison government. in february of this year, the government introduced a bill that would allow the minister to exclude anyone from entering australia for up to two years if they were suspected of being involved in any terrorist activity. with a strong mandate off the back of their resounding election when, they moved to pass the bill. they did ignore a number of key recommendations on the