mr. case, - some of us would think that, - or financial services. - we're already at that point. because many of us will use an app to call a car, or we'll use our app at the supermarket, hold our phone up to the cash register, and pay. there are things happening in the healthcare industry, we happen to be sitting in a state, texas, that has the most people without health insurance in the country. - right. - a lot of people can't get access to even doctors. well, telemedicine is becoming a way that people are suddenly transforming their own healthcare. so in some ways, that era, is here. - no, it's beginning. i would say healthcare take, is an example. yes, in the first and second wave, there have been some innovations in healthcare, but the way most people in most cities, when they go to the doctor, go to the hospital, do, is about the same as it was. - yeah. - and so there is still a lot of room for innovation, in terms of figuring out better ways to help people, when they're trying to stay

it is not a vote dilution case. mr. farr also mentioned somewhat incredibly there is no showing of injury here. evidence of injury -- respectfully, that is not what the record shows, and it's not what the district court found. the district court talked about the hundreds of voters actually disenfranchised in 2014 because of house bill 589. and it is there. it is throughout the opinion. i'm pretty in a commit knowledge, i want to make clear on alle record does show

mr. charles: when you have a boring case, you need to make it exciting. mr. goldstein: maybe you want to talk about the principle consumer case and maybe will will give us his thoughts as well. mr. gupta: i fear this may be the one case that people find even less exciting. it's a case about article iii, standing and abortion and immigration bribery voting. not a case that has got a lot of attention. spokeo versus robbins, but i think it is an important case in its own right, but it is also -- i am glad that tom made the time for this case. these cases are usually not the ones that they focus on, because they are about procedural issues, maybe not as sexy. so maybe when they involve race is committed to at walmart, they are often on the front page. you can say it is a case about access to justice, about separation of powers. you can say it's a case about whether people can put out false information on the internet because those are the facts of the case. spokeo is a web site that publishes reports with facts about people, so you can look up a job applicant or l

cases. judge motz: believe me we are , aware of that. [laughter] mr. farr: so what we can only do is look at the vote issue in the case and see what we can discern from vote dilution cases. you still have to prove discriminatory results. if you go back to the city noble case, but you have to prove purposeful discrimination. mr. farr: i was just trying to line up. if it was exactly the same, you would never have -- there would not be any difference to them. mr. farr: i think the difference would be for the 14th amendment, section two, intentional dissemination claim, they've have to prove purposeful discrimination claim. for the section to results claim, you only need to prove the results. judge motz: why would you ever do an intentional discrimination claim? you would always go to the results claim. mr. farr: not if you would want to do what only happened once in the country, working on the back, but effective preclearance requirement of the plaintiffs are seeking in this case. they don't get that simply by proving the results claim. they need to prove

we were mentioning earlier this week that mr. case passed away over the weekend. t i will bring you, not because the other ones are bad but i think this is the one that's most consistent for san francisco. >> very familiar name for many. >> for sure. >> all right. you described it as the gold standard. thank you very much, scott. >>> these women are sailing on san francisco bay. oh, yeah, that's a dolphin that just popped out of the water. you hear their delight. the video they shot may be a first. right near the golden gate bridge. bottle nose dolphins live off the coast of southern california. they do occasionally make their way into monterrey bay. sometimes as far north as the peninsula. researchers sigh that this is the first video they know of showing one in the bay. >> i want to see the ladies, too. memorable girls trip. >> a dolphins is jumping to hear them laugh. watch what i can make them do. >> sounds like a chow bac chewb >> any time you see wildlife you do document it so the researches can say, hey, this is unusual. >> there you go. very good they did t

mr. netanyahu in to that case. will mr. netanyahu ride back as well? it is not clear. both of those things are being investigated. france,that came from mr. netanyahu denied receiving any money. then he backpedaled and said yes i did receive some money, it wasn't 1 million and wasn't in 2009. declare any donations, he said it occurred earlier when he wasn't a member of parliament. all those questions to be looked at. and the current inquiry, the police inquiry and the french inquiry go hand-in-hand. willere are hopes they revert to an all-out civil war after the prime minister and the former leader ordered an immediate cease-fire. four days of fighting in the capital have killed at least 200 people. theviolence coincides with five-year anniversary of south's udon's independence. taking a look at how the country got to this point. >> south sudan's president signed a peace deal with this warning to his african counterparts. >> otherwise we made -- end a deal was meant to two-year civil war that killed tens of thousands of people and left millions displaced. supporters cl

mr. charles: when you have a boring case you need to make it exciting. [laughter] mr. goldstein: deepak gupta, maybe want to talk about the particular -- principle consumer case and maybe will will give us his thoughts as well. mr. gupta: i fear this may be the one case that people find even less exciting. it's a case about article iii, standing and abortion and immigration bribery voting. not a case that has got a lot of attention. spokeo versus robbins, but i think it is an important case in its own right, because -- but it is also, i am glad that tom made the time for this case. it's a case about access to justice for consumers and workers. these cases are usually not the ones that they focus on, because they are about procedural issues, maybe not as sexy. so maybe when they involve race discrimination at walmart, they are often on the front page. you can say it is a case about justice, about separation of powers. you can say it's a case about whether people can put out false information on the internet because those are the facts of the case. spokeo is a web site th

mr. ford. in this case, the proposal we just defeated and the one that i would have happily explained in detail tomorrow that would have fixed the rule for a long time to allow binding in the , it does notles sound like you haven't appetite for it so i will withdraw. >> it is so ordered without objection. .6, and go to final amendment from colorado. motion, the amendment would change the language of rule number 37 b. >> i will withdraw the amendment. >> without objection so ordered. go to final .23. change the language in numbermber 3070 -- rule 37 d. i've been around for a little while. i've been doing republican stuff since i was chairman of the college republicans at the university of iowa and voted for in my first seller job was with the republican national committee. had a good paper of serving as the chairman of the republican party on the rnc and general counsel and number of other positions. i know what my proposals are being considered and when they are being ignored. there are some good proposals i think and i'm glad i've had the chance to bring them and maybe someone else will have t

i of course know more about my case than i know about mr. sterling's case. we have a man who was permitted to carry a license. there is a legal permit. i have seen it. he was gainfully employed. he was adored by the children in the school where he worked, his coworkers and family talked about the fact that they had never even known him to have ever even been in a fight. so we have a man who's doing everything right. he is pulled over, he's asked for documentation. and then later very quickly he is shot to death. and there are some real concerns. and i am very honored to be representing the castile family in this matter. i really am. >> i want to talk a lot more about that and some new tape and possible video we have. we have to take a quick commercial break. stay with us. >> sure. >> judge glenda hatchet will be returning discussing the philando castile case and more on the other side of the break. from over 30 billion connected devices. just 30 billion? a bold group of researchers and computer scientists in silicon valley, had a breakthrough they called...

when you look at a case like mr. castile's and his driving record. it suggests a pattern of aggressive policing. >> reporter: according to the shooting officer's attorney, he said this had nothing to do with race and everything to do with a gun present at the scene. john, alison. >> rosa. the new developments in the death of alton sterling in baton rouge. the family is calling for the police to release the video taken at the store. the owner is suing police saying the officers illegally detained him and confiscated his security system without warrant. the district attorney in the case has recused himself because he is friends with the parents of one of the officers involved. the feds department of justice civil rights department has taken over the investigation. >>> donald trump is declaring himself the law and order candidate. what else he had to say about the police shootings and protests. that's next. >>> donald trump calling for an immediate end to hostilities to police and calling him the candidate of law and order. he is calling hillary clinton

associated with that, and the opportunity to collaborate more with government, if that is also the case. mr. white: challenges and nice word for the situation. we are unique, not only us, but other israeli companies. we are from one-sided 100% e-government controlled con -- 100% government-owned company, but on the other side we act like a private company. on one side there are tough limitations and challenges because the government is heavy, limitations, regulations we have to maneuver through, other side, some of the customers we are facing are having some kind of a -- let's say easy feeling talking with us backed we are so-called by the government or we are not a private company. we see the backing of the government as the backbone, a supportive argument for our marketing activities. on if you put both of them the table, it is a challenging situation for the ceo to manage through all of these, let's say, inputs into this big equation, but by the end of the day, personally, i can tell you, in spite being a 100% government-owned company, i don't feel at all that somebody stops me from runn

mr. castile. this case has nothing to do with race. and everything to do with the presence of a gun. >> in the video castile's girlfriend says they warned the officer he had a firearm and license to carry. >> i would like for that police officer to look me in my eyes, look me in my eyes officer, my hands are up. why? >> no justice, no peace. >> reporter: in baton rouge, louisiana overnight tense moments when up to 1,000 protesters stared down police over the death of another black man, that shooting partially caught on video this week. at one point during last night's protest an officer appeared to draw his gun. baton rouge police say they are reviewing the video. they acknowledge tensions were high but cooler heads prevailed. president obama today did reference the gun in the car here in minnesota saying even though it was licensed, the prevalence of guns in america makes all of us less safe. he says it adds to tensions between police and the public. >> that debate heating up. blake, thank you for that report. after this week's shooti

mrs. clinton's case?well the comparison to petty offenses i don't think is, useful but the question of ignorance of the law is no excuse but here's the distinction. you have to have general criminal intent. you don't need to know what particular statute you're violating but you must be aware of generally wrongful nature of your conduct. >> so congress, when they enacted that statute said gross negligence. that doesn't say intent. so what are we going to have to enact to get you guys to prosecute something based on negligence or gross negligence? oh by the way we really do mean you don't have to have intent there? >> that's a conversation for you all to have with the department of justice but it would have to be something more than the statute enacted in 1917 because for 99 years they have been very worried about it is constitutionality. >> all right. i think that is something this committee and congress as a whole, judiciary committee, mr. chaffetz and i also sit on will be looking at it. i was on televis

case. >> i am telling you we don't. and i hope people take the time to understand why. >> mr. chairman, i yield back. >> we with recognize mr. goat from arizona. we'll go to the gentlemen the gentleman from south carolina. >> thank you, mr. comey, you heard a long list of statements that mrs. clinton made both to the public and to congress that were not factually accurate. you went down the list. when she met with you. she didn't say the same things at that interview? >> i am not here without the 302. >> it is your testimony? >> i have no basis for concluding that she lied to the fbi. >> did anybody ask her why she told you one thing and told us another. >> i don't know. >> would that have been of interest to establishing intent. >> it could. >> did anybody ask her why she set up the e-mail system as she did in the first place? >> yes. >> the answer was convenience. >> it was there and a system her husband had. she jumped on to it. >> her assistant said this week it was to keep e-mailses from being accessible and concealment purpose. uma was asked why it was set up to keep per

mrs. clinton's case? >> well the comparison to petty offenses i don't think is useful but the question of ignorance of law is no excuse but here's the sbings, you have to have general criminal intent. you don't need to know which statute you are violating but you must be aware of the wrongful nature of the connect. >> what are we going to have to enact to get you guys to prosecute something based on negligence or gross negligence? by the way we don't mean -- we mean you don't have to have intent there? >> that's a conversation for you all to have with the department of justice but it would have to be something more than the statute enacted in 1917 because they've been worried about it's constitutionality. >> i think that's something this committee and congress will hold a judiciary committee that we also sit on and will be looking at it. i was on television this morning and i want to relay a question that i received from a caller into that television commercial and it's just real simple. why should any pe

mrs. clinton's case? >> well, the comparison to petty offenses i don't think is useful but the question of ignorance of the law is no excuse but here's the distinction. you have to have general criminal intent. you don't need to know what particular statute you're violating but you must be aware of the generally wrongful nature of your conduct. >> so congress when they enacted that statute said gross negligence. that doesn't say intent. what do we have to enact to get you guys to prosecute something based on negligence or gross negligence? and oh by the way we really do mean you don't have to have intent there? >> that's a conversation for you all to have with the department of justice but it would have been to be something more than the statute enacted in 1917 because for 99 years they've been very worried about its constitutionality. >> well, i think that's something this committee and congress as a whole, the judiciary committee that mr. chaffetz and i will be looking at. i was on television this morni

mr. trump, who's going to be making his case about why this was wrong. but that's politics. that's not really having anything to do with the independence of prosecutorial discretion. thank you, director comey. i yield whatever additional time i have to mr. cummings. >> i think the gentleman is going to yield back. i have spoken with mr. cummings. now recognize the gentleman from kentucky, mr. massey, for five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman. thank you, director comey, for showing up and your willingness to be transparency and answer a lot of unanswered questions. a few hours before this hearing started i went on to social media and asked people to submit questions. i've got over 500 questions. i don't think i'll get to ask them all in these five minutes, but i'm sure you'll be willing to answer them. one of the common themes that i came in here to ask that i realize it is not the right question now is what's the difference between extremely careless and gross negligence. but in the process of this hearing, what i'm hearing you say is, that's not what we -- that's not what

mrs. clinton's case. >> now, if that's true, and i don't know that it is, it's your opinion, right?> it is my opinion. >> but you look a little smug on the opinion, you look like you are 100% convinced that what you just said that comey puts politics over what's best for the country and you look like you're 100% convinced of that. >> i'm only 95% convinced of anything i say, but this is my best judgment. if you followed jim comey's career over many years, especially when he was going after people like john ashcroft in the first bush administration, the witch hunt against scootier libby, jim comey is very good going after targets who are already objects of hatred and derision among the liberal establishment in washington. so when we wrote that editorial three years ago, just lifting his record, we were relative loners. people were applauding him as a straight shooter. this coming as no surprise he would not take on a target as politically significant and favored by so much in washington as mrs. clinton. and i say that as no fan of the other guy. >> if what you're saying is true, this

mr. obama. ashleigh? >> this case is taking over for a big campaign story that plagued the headlines all weekend long and it had to do with a tweet and a picture of hillary clinton with a six-point star. many call that the star of david, saying crooked hillary, scattered dollar bills all throughout it, there you have it, most corrupt candidate ever. people say that is anti-semitic and it got changed to this. the star of david image, if that's what you call it, was erased and replaced with a circle instead. now, for the trump campaign's part, they say it wasn't a star of david. it was a sheriff's star. it's the kind of thing that you can find on any web-based image and that's not true. this specific image had come from a bigoted message board, identical, the dollar bills, the picture of hillary. it wasn't like i found a star and put it there. >> that's one school of thought. if you talk to people from the trump campaign, they have a different school of thought. and the person taking a fall for this, the social media di

mr. booker, i understand you made the case against mr. trump but who is hillary clinton almost as polarizing and divisive, how does she make the case she's the candidate for reconciliation? >> i patently disagree with you on issues of race and religious issues that she's polarizing. if anything, i've watched her in black communities and white communities put forth the spirit of america and our founders said this is a time we need to mutely pledge our sacred honor and she's manifested that on race, religion, of gender diversity, she's someone that can build our bridges and far more than the alternative. someone who is injecting more divisiveness through the affiliation and refusal to denounce patent racists. >> thank you both for coming on together. hopefully we can make this a habit again on "meet the press". appreciate it. >> thank you. >>> coming up, how will this week impact the presidential race and is this the week we'll learn who donald trump's running mate will be? we'll be right back. >>> welcome back. hillary clinton had this to s

mr. cruz. in this case we want a change and mr. trump clear live is going to give it to us.avid: tammy has the first and last word. it was a good first and last word. we are coming back with a lot more. stay with us. up next, the best of lou's recent interview with donald trump. >> there will be consequences for companies that close down companies and go to mexico and think they will just sell here because of free trade. another one on one final word for our viewers interview with trump up next. later in this show the bulldog is charging to get a bite of the sky. hey, heart, what's this? that's my resignation letter. you're resigning...why? because you're constantly ignoring me, you're half as active as you used to be and you eat stuff like this! you've been putting me under a lot of pressure, lately. that's why i'm ready to quit! i forgot! i'll do better. please don't quit on me! ok, but remember, it's not what you say, it's what you do. [narrator] listen to your heart. don't let it quit on you. let's go for a walk! [narrator] uncontrolled high blood pressure could lead to

mr. cruz. in this case we want a change and mr. trump clear live is going to give it to us.avid: tammy has the first and last word. it was a good first and last word. we are coming back with a lot more. stay with us. up next, the best of lou's recent interview with donald trump. >> there will be consequences for companies that close down companies and go to mexico and think they will just sell here because of free trade. another one on one final word for our viewers interview with trump up next. later in this show the bulldog is charging to get a bite of the sky. please stay with us. we are coming right back. david: lou dobbs recently sat down with donald trump for a wide range of issues. lou: your focus on hillary clinton. you are the first republican presumptive nominee to focus on the middle class, men and women and their families and international trade. the first. and you have a unique appeal to independents as well as to the republicans that you brought into the primary process. where do you take that message on illegal immigration. job creation and restoring prosperit

mr. grayson: in that case, mr. chair, you leave me no hoice but move to adjourn. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the motion to adjourn. so many as are in favor say aye. those opposed, no. in the opinion of the chair, the noes have it. mr. grayson: i request the yeas and nays. the speaker pro tempore: the yeas and nays are requested. those favoring a vote by the a sufficient will rise. number having arisen, the yeas and nays are ordered. members will record their votes by electronic device. this will be a 15-minute vote. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the noes are 373. present one. expenditure of funds the speaker pro tempore: on the motion there is zero yeas, 362 nays. and one present. the motion does not carry. for what purpose does the gentlelady fr

mr. cruz. in this case we want a change and mr. trump clear live is going to give it to us.avid: tammy has the first and last word. it was a good first and last word. we are coming back with a lot more. stay with us. up next, the best of lou's recent interview with donald trump. >> there will be consequences for companies that close down companies and go to mexico and think they will just sell here because of free trade. another one on one final word for our viewers interview with trump up next. later in this show the bulldog is charging to get a bite of the sky. it's the little things in life that make me smile. spending the day with my niece. i don't use super poligrip for hold, because my dentures fit well. before those little pieces would get in between my dentures and my gum and it was uncomfortable. even well fitting dentures let in food particles. just a few dabs of super poligrip free is clinically proven to seal out more food particles so you're more comfortable and confident while you eat. so it's not about keeping my dentures in, it's about keeping the food partic

mr. is about the case. constand accuses cosby of drugging and sexually assaulting her in 2004. cosby is awaiting trial on those charges in montgomery county court. >> well, coming up: pair of huge wild fires still burning today in california. >> just ahead, whole new way to look at the destructive and deadly flames. katie? >> and brooke, once more, we are tracking it additional wet weather here in our forecast. not necessarily for the rest of the day today but coming up for the weekend, which may put a dam perron your plans. i'm going to track everything coming our way for you in our full forecast after the break. donald trump: i could stand in the middle of 5th avenue i'm hillary clinton and i approve this message. and shoot somebody and i wouldn't lose any voters, okay? and you can tell them to go f--- themselves! you know, you could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever... you gotta see this guy. ahh, i don't know what i said, ahh. "i don't remember." he's going like "i don't remember!" >> we're getting a unusual view of the huge califo

mr. rose: in this case, washington was the field commander. mr.ullough: he rode with the troops but he was not commanding immediately. general greene and general sullivan were the commanders of the prongs that attacked. and the boston bookseller henry knox was in charge of the artillery. the artillery really were decisive in net battle. mr. rose: these guys that george washington chose early in 1775 served him at trenton. mr. mccullough: they served him through the entire war. they were the only general officers to stay the distance, to go the whole way with washington. only two of them. washington, knox, and greene are the only general officers. mr. rose: hamilton came in, didn't he? did he serve as an aide to washington? mr. mccullough: he was a young artillery officer. he fought at trenton and new york. mr. rose: what did he think of washington? mr. mccullough: he idolized him. later on they would have their differences. of course, he would become washington's secretary of the treasury. -- rose: did washington have after he is one of the great

cases henrik. henry was a german in east baltimore. he was such a good soldier he made sergeant the peer they interviewed him to death said mr. gunther, where was your motherboard? he's such a case where mr. father born? germany. thank you are coming in today. you can return to your duties. that was very common. he made the mistake when he wrote a letter to a kaizen and it was deemed a defeatist letter. he said don't come over. it's awful. don't come over if you can avoid it. they accused in a defeatist and then he was busted for the rest of the battle he did every dangerous task that he could do, including being a runner out messages. with seconds to go, all the men have to do is lay down on the ground. he stood up. the second to go before the armistice. he stood up, walked tories the browning automatic rifle and was shot in the head and killed. he is officially the last man to die in world war i. there is a monument to him that was erected by a small village as you can see in the lower left-hand corner in france. here you are driving up through the middle of nowhere. this is not in a terribly active area and you see this ame

mr. trump last night made the case that he is the candidate of safety, of national security, of law and order. today's events in munich certainly play into mr. trump's narrative that the world is unsafe and that america most especially has to do a better job at protecting itself and its citizens. >> there's no question that that's the case, tyler. donald trump painted a picture of a world on fire. and tragedies like we saw today, which have happened all too often recently, simply underscore the concern that so many americans have, so many people around the world have about the fight against terrorism and it allows him to say, i have not seen whether he has tweeted on this or spoken publicly since the event, but he is going to be able to say, this is exactly what i was talking about in my convention speech last night. >> you are in philadelphia, if i can turn you to the democratic convention, which is coming up this week, we widely expect hillary clinton to announce her running mate either tonight or certainly some time over the weekend. >> we do. and we also expect that it's going to be virgi

he messed it up, and i had to owe him a case of beer. [laughter] mr. collins: and we got sick, not physically sick, but we were upside down for some time and it was a mess. mr. rubenstein: jeff, suppose someone watching once to go to -- wants to go to space. where do they sign up, how much does it cost, and when will they be able to do it? mr. bezos: we do not know exactly what we will charge. virgin galactic is charging somewhere between $250,000 and $300,000 a ticket. we will be in the same range to start with and keep working overtime to make it cheaper. mr. rubenstein: when do you think that will be available? mr. bezos: 2018. we will fly our first test astronauts in late 2017, hopefully. if the test program continues to go. we are flying again this friday. we are webcasting that. if the test program continues to go well, we should be ready to put people on board late 2017 and paying astronauts on 2018. mr. rubenstein: can somebody sign up now? mr. bezos: we are not taking deposits or anything yet. mr. rubenstein: if people want to go, should they

in that case, as with mrs. clinton, investigators found no intent to leak the injured -- information to energy ages, but mr. cummings investigators made the case against the reservists, who pleaded to a misdemeanor charge. when he sits in that chair this morning, applicants -- republicans will come armed with times when the fbi did make a case against those who have mishandled classified information. let's go to rudy, san antonio, texas. democrat, good morning. caller: good morning. i have been paying attention to what is going on. they say that she, the state department computers were hacked. suppose this is a counter intelligence ruse. suppose they did put out information, but it was false and the market top secret. -- marked it top secret. -- it justcurity seems to me like something is not right. this is what i came up with. it was done in world war ii were the told the enemy false information, market top secret. why not now? and they use that computer, media, all that stuff. they found out that it was, that

but as trump often does, he wandered off message, and in some cases, way off message. mr.rump: hillary clinton cannot keep her e-mails safe. and you know what, folks? she sure as hell cannot keep our country safe. cannot do it. we are talking about the safety of our people. the laws are very explicit. stupidity is not a reason that you're going to be innocent. she went to extraordinary lengths to carry out a purge of her e-mails. i think the one with the most to lose -- he just lost today. she is crooked hillary, don't you understand that? we need unity in the republican party, real unity. and the leaders have to get supportive. saddam hussein was a bad guy, right? but you know what he did well? he killed terrorists. he did that so well, they did not talk, it was over. john: trump, we showed you a decent, pretty good attacks. he also made that comment about saddam hussein and a whole lot of other comments. and the saddam thing has gotten as much if not more attention from the hillary clinton issue. so mark, is trump seizing this moment, or wasting a valuable, maybe invalua

would you stick with that definition if that was the case? mr. earnest: we still need to learn more about this individual and his potential motivation. links to anytial other organization. we will certainly take a close look at this organization" supports the french investigators. there are significant capabilities we have to assist them. we won't hesitate to use them. i believe the security secretary traveled to sign condolences in france. any plans for the present to do that in the coming days? mr. earnest: i believe secretary johnson signed a condolence book, but also had time with the french ambassador to the united states. we certainly intend to continue those kinds of consultations in the days ahead. when you use the word terrorism on this. when you look at something like in orlando versus something centralized and developed, something that was planned and executed. the terms used by the white house is the same. but the situation seems to be different. can you explain how you see, and the thought in using better? mr. earnest: in this case w

talk about how many police we're talking about, how many state troopers, and what has happened at case. mr: initially we were informed by a whistleblower there would be 1500 police officers, and that prompted our petition peers subsequently we found out there would be 1700 police officers, and 200 members of the national guard that would be housed, essentially quartered at our university during the rnc. amy: what was your problem with that? mr. taylor: well, essentially, it is a third-amendment violation that these out-of-state police officers are coming into our university and, essentially, that there is no consent -- that president decidedr unilaterally to house these police officers, and no one at the university know about this -- not no one, but students and many members of the faculty did not know about this, and so that is what prompted, again, our petition, just to bring awareness to the campus community, and also to voice some of our concern that these police officers coming into town would be under the auspices of the cleveland police department. and, so, some of our concerns had

mr. trump, who's going to be making his case about why this was wrong. but that's politics. that's not really having anything to do with the independence of prosecutorial discretion. thank you, director comey. i yield whatever additional time i have to mr. cummings. >> i think the gentleman is going to yield back. i have spoken with mr. cummings. now recognize the gentleman from kentucky, mr. massey, for five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman. thank you, director comey, for showing up and your willingness to be transparency and answer a lot of unanswered questions. a few hours before this hearing started i went on to social media and asked people to submit questions. i've got over 500 questions. i don't think i'll get to ask them all in these five minutes, but i'm sure you'll be willing to answer them. one of the common themes that i came in here to ask that i realize it is not the right question now is what's the difference between extremely careless and gross negligence. but in the process of this hearing, what i'm hearing you say is, that's not what we -- that's not what

mr. castile. this case has nothing to do with the race and everything to do with the gun.ng cured when castile was reaching into his back pocket to pull out identification for per the officer's request. castile told the officer he has a permit for a gun and he has a gun. immediately after the shooting, minnesota's governor mark dayton said he believed that had castile been a white man the outcome would have been different. there was racial issues at play here. he got a lot of pushback from law enforcement calling the remarks irresponsible. when i followed with the governor, he's standing by those. >> do you standby the remarks? >> i said them. i said them. i'm not going to back and rehash what i said yesterday. i standby what i said yesterday based on the information i had. >> the best piece of evidence you would have in a case like this is a body camera on the officer. unfortunately saint anthony police don't have body cameras. we won't have the direct point of view of the officer's. we have dash cam video with audio. the police cars were parked behind castile's car. we'r

in the case of mr. castille, this horrific vision of this andn who with utter calm composure is narrating what happens while there is a police officer holding a gun to her and her loved one is dying in front of her. and thend she is calm officer is not. jelani: the exact opposite of what you might expect in that situation where someone sees their fiancÉe shot and they become hysterical and the professional person, their training kicks in and they become calm but that is not what happened. and even more terrible idea here is that perhaps she was driven by a concern that she not do anything that might trigger him to fire again and also there is a four-year old girl in the car. all of it compounds into something too horrible to really think about. miles: let's talk about the political system. fundamental lack of faith in the system. donald trump frequently talking about the system being rigged, reinforcing peoples believe that the system is not in it for them. the fact there is a so little faith in the sys