just a suggestion. >> just to make sure i understand, mr. chenhat we'd work together on the language and then it would go where? >> it would not, that we'd -- >> that would -- if there is this no objection from my fellow commissioners. >> chairperson keane: i think that is a good idea. commissioner chiu will help you out with regard to this and no one october to that. we have a motion and seconded and before us. all those in favor say aye. all those opposed. >> no. >> chairperson keane: the motion passes 4-1. thank you all very much. let's move to the next and commissioner chiu i want to thank you for all that hard work you put in on it. it was above and beyond. let's see now. let's go to item number seven. discussion and possible action on proposed changes to ethic commission regulations 67.331, and 15.102-1 sunshine and ethics training. kyle. >> hi, commissioners. i'm going to keep brief on this. this has been in front of you twice in terms of a policy report. the two regulations that we're seeking to amend which are on agenda item 7 page 3, we

mr. chen: i think this is part of the problem. on health care, for example, he did come in and make a late push on the house side and they were able to get a bill across the finish line. but when it got to the senate, he went back and called the mean, and that hurt a lot of people feelings and made things very difficult, politically. president see if the will focus in and save use of the things i really want out of this package. it's important that you support this package. we haven't seen that yet. i do tend to think that the president comes in and really weighs in hard on a particular set of reforms that he wants and really pushes legislators, i do think we will see that will make a difference, but we haven't really seen so far that concerted effort to push on one set of policy reforms and to do it in a focused way. scarlet: there's been some talk that president trump may be pressuring republicans, or republicans on their owner wanted to fold in repeal efforts into the tax reform bill, espec

(applause) >> mr. chen. >> i meng-hsiu chen do solemnly swear too support the constitution of the united states and state of california against all enemies foreign and domestic. >> can you repeat that? >> yeah. >> that i will bare true faith and allegiance to the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of california. >> that i take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evaluation. that i will well and faithfully discharge the duties that i'm about to enter and during such time that i hold the office for member of the board of examiners, registered mechanical engineer seat in the city and county of san francisco. congratulations. >> i am honored to be with all you people. i have a master degree from u.c. berkeley in mechanical engineering. i have been working in the city of san francisco since 1977. so i'm a little experienced at least in my field. i'll be honored to serve for the board. thank you. >> we're honored to have you. (applause) >> commissio

. >> i think mr. chen has -- you'e indicating you have something te on what commissioner kopp said? >> just this is probably not the for a full discussion of the pr, but to clarify, the ethics commn cannot place a charter amendmene ballot, that would be somethingt needs to go through the board of supervisors. >> both of those changes requira charter amendment. not sunshine? >> that would be an ordinance. >> on what grounds? >> so section sa 15.102 of the r is the provision that allows ths commission to place measures one ballot. that specifies that the etics cn only places ordinant ordinance . >> what do you recommend as our attorney? >> if the commission wished to e such a charter amendment, it wod forward to the board of supervir further consideration. >> what is that suggest as a recommendation from you to us? >> that the commission can still consider it and that the commisa is -- is amenable they can forwo the supervisor. it can be any recommendation the on a matter of recommendation. >> what would the form of the recommendation be? >> a vote in favor from the memf the ethics co

chairman -- >> commissioner kopp -- >> through the chair to mr. chen, there was distributed this may 18, 2012 memorandum all city departments from the sunshine ordinance task force, it refers to the office of the city attorney in this way task force disagrees with the office of the city attorney's interpretation for requirements of summaries and meeting minutes. have you you being the office, issued a written opinion on the subject matter? >> our advice on this issue is contained in the good government guide which is referenced. >> does the brown act require that will the local government body accepts to be reproduced within the minutes? >> no that

mr. chen tells us he and his wife just want to hold onto the street because they like it. whatever the case it will be here tomorrow. kpix5, phil matier in san francisco, back to you. >>> investigators say a bomb mailed to an alameda police officer could be retaliation for his work finding a gang. kpix5's juliette goodrich tells us the bomb that injured the officer's wife is similar to one mailed to an east palo alto address. >> reporter: somehow a mailed bomb package got through the system twice in the fast two months. on friday it was to a police officer's home. inspector jeff fitch is with the united states police office and said multiple agencies are investigating. this is a huge safety issue to your investigators and the public. >> if anyone spots anything, we're asking them to call 911 or call postal inspectors. >> reporter: kpix5 has learned the package was delivered by the usps to the home of the officer who was off duty at the time. sources tell us when the officer's wife opened the package, she thought it looked suspicious, so she threw it. when the bomb exploded