mr. cherry. are there any questions for oewd? seeing none, are there any public comment on items 8 or 9? seeing no public comment, do we have a motion -- supervisor safai? >> i just want to make sure, the streets will be accepted back and they'll be fully-accepted streets by the city? i understand the city will own those streets, but they'll be fully-accepted streets? >> yes. all of the streets that you saw in dark green, all of the streets will be fully-accepted, fully-owned streets. >> chair peskin: thank you, supervisor safai. so on item 8, i would like to insert the date being december 10. on item number -- there's a blank. so that's the -- -- >> apologize, chair. for the date, that would be the november 5 resolution. >> chair peskin: no, i think that's december 10. if we're talking about file 150969, this is the resolve that says notice is here by given on blank date, 2019 i believe was the november 5 date? okay. we will take that and fill that in and forward that to the full board with a positive recommendation. and then on

mr. jimmy , did he look pretty ill we decided that we would have a soda cherry red flavor, jimmy my song d to me, and that was dead i said to him you can't always get what you want now you can't always get what you want you can't always get what you want ♪ but if you try some time, you just might find you get what you need ♪ ♪ >> campaign 2020. watch our live coverage of presidential candidates on the campaign trail and make up your own mind. c-span's campaign 2020, your unfiltered view of politics. ♪ >> live friday on the c-span networks at 10:00 a.m. eastern, former education secretary's arne duncan and john king discussed education policy in the 2020 election. at 8:00 p.m., president trump holds a campaign rally in lake charles, louisiana. on c-span two edit: 50 a.m., the family research council old its annual values voters summit in washington. among speakers are congressman mark meadows, the usaid administrator and sebastian gorka. on c-span3 at 8:30 a.m., presidential candidate governor steve bullock of montana speaks at the new hampshire institute of politics at the politics and eg

mr. johnson: this week the democratic majority will hold more secret meetings in the capitol basement, release more selective cherry-picked leak designed to confuse the american people -- leaks designed to confuse the american people, and proven their proven -- guilty -- guilty until proven innocent. the russian collusion hoax failed miserably and the robert mueller testimony gave them nothing. so now they're on to plan b. they say they have the evidence to impeach. but we've already heard that song. democratic leaders have claimed to have evidence before. let's see if they can actually produce their evidence this time. let's get on with working for the american people. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> to address the house for one minute. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentleman is recognized for one minute. >> madam speaker, my colleagues on the other side of the aisle have been trying to impeach president trump since he took office and we all know this. they've made it very clear, they deem the president's every action to b

mr. wright: from the beginning, this effort has lacked transparency. the american public deserve the truth. instead, all they're getting are cherry-picked leaks and classic washington fashion -- in classic washington fashion. in its current form, this process is an outrage and counter to our interests and the values of our republic. i urge my colleagues to abandon this political charade and adhere to the constitution. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired. for what purpose does the gentlewoman from indiana seek recognition? without objection, the gentlewoman is recognized for one minute. >> thank you, madam speaker. mrs. walorski: i rise today because what we are witnessing is unprecedented in the history of this country. house democratic leaders are conducting an impeachment inquiry behind closed doors with selective leaks instead of transparency with no due process, without a vote on the house floor. why do they want to keep this process hidden from view? because they know the american people will see right through this partisan scheme. democrats decided to impeach this president the day he too

mr. johnson: this week the democratic majority will hold more secret meetings in the capitol basement, release more selective cherry-picked leak designed to confuse the american people -- leaks designed to confuse the american people, and proven their proven -- guilty -- guilty until proven innocent. the russian collusion hoax failed miserably and the robert mueller testimony gave them nothing. so now they're on to plan b. they say they have the evidence to impeach. but we've already heard that song. democratic leaders have claimed to have evidence before. let's see if they can actually produce their evidence this time. let's get on with working for the american people. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> to address the house for one minute. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentleman is recognized for one minute. >> madam speaker, my colleagues on the other side of the aisle have been trying to impeach president trump since he took office and we all know this. they've made it very clear, they deem the president's every action to b

mr. schiff has been running. >> jordan once again called for release of the full kurt volker transcript who was grilled behind closed doors for a full day and republicans say quotes have been cherry his day of testimony. >> sandra: it's only 10:00 on the east coast. thank you. >> bill: bring in the a-team. liz peek, robert wolf, ceo of 32 advisors and tom bevan co-founder of real clear politics. let's start with theories? you want to start there? what's going on, tom? >> the president is clearly taking a scorched earth approach forcing the democrats' hand. he wants them on record with a vote and wants them to force them into subpoenaing witnesses. but this certainly reinforces the mess that's going on. republicans have a point this is now being done behind closed doors. why don't we do it in public? doesn't the public deserve to hear exactly what all of these folks that are involved have to say? why are we doing it behind closed doors? democrats are using it to say the trump administration is hiding something. >> bill: what do you believe? >> i think that's exactly right. a political show. the republicans feel the way the democrats are handling it is working in their favor behind

would require the cherry committee to file report to asking why information or witnesses in this committee which is an effort to add additional hoops for people to get through. i yield mr. cole. i >> don't know any committee that would go through this process. the chairman of the subcommittee would require something from my ranking member and witness and i didn't do myself. if that's the problem here, by all means and if it's something they know particularly you think it's important, fine. but every witnesses comes they decide by whoever calls them. >> the ranking member will have every right to request subpoenas and information from witnesses and only the chair can decline the appeals process which is why i would urge to free the amendment. >> i would require the same of everybody of why see one side? >> it's not on the coal amendment all members say i. (roll call) >> i'm doesn't number nine. >> with the events? >> the house revolution six six zero strike line 24 on page seven and the ranking minority member of the house judiciary is authorized to requests witnesses relevant to the investigation with the resolution on a number of witnesses that's equal requested by th