mr. christensen. my comments, my initial comments for this is that we are aware that the mission is heavily saturated or not just mission but priarily on the eastern side of the city. and i think for me what i'm finding problematic is that we lack of equity policy when it comes to cannabis. and so what is happening, i feel like, is that you know, communities are resorted to cbas. and again, in terms of the negotiation that's happening between the community and the project sponsor on the community benefits, you know, again, the committee are left to negotiate on those things. and us in the planning, i feel like we need to assess, especially if it's a big -- if it's a bigger square footage of a place, where just about 5,000 square feet, that if we're -- that there need to be a tracking of cannabis dispenary and whether this is appropriate in this area and if this is appropriate in tis area, then what are the best measurements for equity. i'm having a hard time on this. i'm not going to be -- i'm just go

had binds developing countries on sustainable development it's good to have you on the program mr christensen let me ask you let me just get your reaction to president biden bringing the u.s. back into the paris climate agreement. yeah thank you for having me and of course it was a very strong symbolic act that they gave us the decree signed yesterday and it was immediately also transmitted to the un and us for not a month's time be part of the pair's agreement again and maybe they will still be participating but of course the terms real and climate hasn't been much active but as a patient and. already last night the u.n. secretary general welcomed the u.s. backed by the u.s. leadership both internationally but also looking at with a climate plan right button and her. hair is receding and passed to domestic action that emerged in the introduction also so we're coming very much in and out of my u.s. friends i'm quite optimistic because if we not only have you got john kerry as the lead on its initial climate issues but you can also see it now but of the d.d. climate experts coming back in the

mr. christensen. my comments, my initial comments for this is that we are aware that the mission is heavily saturated or not just mission but priarily on the eastern side of the city. and i think for me what i'm finding problematic is that we lack of equity policy when it comes to cannabis. and so what is happening, i feel like, is that you know, communities are resorted to cbas. and again, in terms of the negotiation that's happening between the community and the project sponsor on the community benefits, you know, again, the committee are left to negotiate on those things. and us in the planning, i feel like we need to assess, especially if it's a big -- if it's a bigger square footage of a place, where just about 5,000 square feet, that if we're -- that there need to be a tracking of cannabis dispenary and whether this is appropriate in this area and if this is appropriate in tis area, then what are the best measurements for equity. i'm having a hard time on this. i'm not going to be -- i'm just go

mr. christensen, do you have indication from other facilities that have on site consumption? is there any reasons to be caution about what you're describing? >> any complaints or thing that happened after their cannabis begin to operate? >> the difficulty is, these permits we've been discussing today are all new. for the most part, we don't have any facilities that are open and the ones that could have opened in the last year have been tax cu--shut down due to covid. we don't have a good picture. it does appear that the type a and b consumption permit are generally more popular. likely something we'll see more because type c looking in vaporizing ventilation system will cost few hundred thousand. we will get to see that more in the future. it's not an activity that's been happening recently. >> commissioner tanner: okay. [indiscernible] i wanted to make sure that -- i want to clarify, at the time of the application meeting, there will be no on site consumption. that seem like that changed? >> i would make clear, at this point, we have not heard from the project sponsor that t