perspective of the board and from staff and management that we worked on this year would be ab 2865 by mr. chu, the hot lane measure that would allow an alternative for the authority to consider using that law to implement hot lanes. the lady merging, but very important measure, ab 1184 by mr. tang which authorizes the city and county of san francisco to do a t.n.c. tax, that was supported and the bill was chaptered. a bill you had on the watch list, didn't take a formal position, but which has garnered a lost attention throughout the bay area is mr. chu's ab 2923 which was chaptered. and if that is the bill that deals with t.o.d. units near b.a.r.t.-owned properties. jumping on from that -- oh, i should mention, the table 2 is the list of bills that were watched and monitored but for which no position was taken this year. looking back at this particular last year, i think one of the under stated themes of the year was the state budget. the revenues that poured into the state coffers put the state budget over $200 billion for the first time in its history and it allowed the governor to fund th

one for mrs. chu, i was curious because you spoke so much as to how chinese education focuses on the collective. i'm curious asca to how they handle students with interms or disabilities with by their nature are different from what we perceive as normal. and h for mr. driver i was curis with the push for inclusion in our public schools, and moving away from modified or resource classes towards the full inclusion based model, where do you see educational law going award to the spectrum of services offered to students with disabilities. republican national committee were you talking about kids with special needs? okay. it's fairly the prospects for these kids are dismal. if i can put it frankly. i talked to there are several activists in china, they are trying to call the attention to this issue. they're setting up separate sisters, throughout is nothing in the school system that can identify special needs. even the diagnosis is incredibly primitive. the document says every city with 300,000 population