mr. clark -- i think you need to weigh it by looking at each document in dispute. that's the only way to do it i think under the constitution and frankly under the presidential records act. the only way to do this effectively and to have the former president's, you know, rights to executive privilege to be heard is to have a review by the court of each document as it comes out that's in dispute. judge -- other than slowing down the process what would this -- and can you point to me a case that says i'm required to do that? mr. clark -- no, i can't. judge shulkin said she agreed with donald trump's lawyer on one point. one she said some of these requests are alarming broad, but some of them are very specific and are specifically, you know, geared or targeting events of january 6th. the judge then cited a supreme court decision which she says held, quote, that the former president's rights are less significant because he is a former president. and where the current president has waived privilege, the court must necessarily consider that waiver. our discussion tonight

mr. clark. no i can't. judge said she agreed with donald trump's lawyer and one point, when she said, some of these requests are alarmingly broad. but, some of them are very specific, in our specifically geared or targeting events from january 6th. the judge then cited a supreme court decision, which she says, held quote, the former presidents rights, are less significant because he's a former president. and where the current president has waived privilege, the court must necessarily consider that waiver. leading off our discussion tonight is adam shift of california, he's the chair of the house intelligence committee, and he's a member of the january 6th select committee, he was the lead impeachment manager in the first impeachment trial of donald trump, thank you very much for joining us tonight, as a former legal practitioner yourself, standing in those courtrooms, what did you make of this hearing today? >> the judge was clearly very skeptical of what the trump lawyers were arguing and for good reason.

to also prosecute mr. clark. the only real difference is that mr. k can say, well, i didn't work for the government. bannon couldn't even say that in terms of the questions he was going to be asked. he wasn't even a government employee. but that doesn't make this a valid defense. >> got i. maya wiley, as always, thank you, my friend. great to see you. i hope you come back a lot more on my program. great to see you back on the air doing what you always do. thank you. >>> all right, truth, lies, and home remedies, everybody. nfl star aaron rodgers taking hits for misleading comments about his vaccination status. what the league knew and when. we're getting destroyed out there. we need a plan! right now, at t-mobile, customers on magenta max can get the new iphone 13 pro... and t-mobile will pay for it! upgrade to the iphone 13 pro... on us. ♪ ♪ ♪ hey google. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ tonight, i'll be eating lobster ravioli with shaved truffles. yes! you look amazing! no, you look amazing! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! haha, you're

>> mr. clark is in a small group that has continued to stonewall us.s not produced any documents. he came to the deposition but refused to answer questions and exerted both executive privilege and attorney/client privilege, which is a little confusing, and so we're going to proceed. and that's what the business meeting on wednesday meeting will be about is the referral for criminal contempt. we feel he has shown just a willing -- unwillingness to come forward and testify. we feel that of the 250 people that have come before us and submitted interviews, this should be no different including his two superiors at the time, acting attorney rosen and donahue. we've received a lot of information. there was information put out that talked about mr. clark's role and delegitimizing the election results, and we feel he has an obligation to come before us and share what he knows. >> did you say over 250 people have communicated with the investigation at this point either giving you documents or testified or both? over 250? >> 250 interviews. there has been a ton

so, for example, mr. clark, you could say, with respect to these particular documents, there's going to be some concrete form to the executive identified, presenting to the court, explaining, but it's sort of in the same vein of judge wilkins and judge moll et was talking about because you come back and say, here it is. here is why the incumbent president wants to waive the president. it needs to stay in place and i need to be able to prevent these documents from being disclosed. here's the concrete harm that this particular document will cause if it goes out to congress. >> i -- the harm here is the constitutional harm to the executive branch which i know we've discussed. and i don't believe that i've raised this specifically at the beginning of my argument that the former president's determination with respect to privilege in some instances is going to be a more -- a better determination with respect to privilege because of the context and conversations and documents, records, whatever. and the court needs to

she kept pressing mr. clark, who represented mr. trump. wha what's the harm to your client? k kept saying executive privilege. and she said, no, we're past that. we only have one president at a time. >> so if one is alarming and the other is alarmingly worse, it could go into favor here that congress has a right to all they requested? >> maybe they'll trim a few, like april 2020. she said maybe some of the political polls that were involved then, maybe they don't have to be produced. but even though she could trim around the edges, congress is going to be told it's entitled to everything it wants. she's not going to stay her judgment, either, because mr. clark can't even assert harm to his client. >> gloria, we know some people around trump, what they were saying about the insurrection. we also know everything awful we found out came from contemporaneous notes. in this case this is what they want. they don't have those yet. but we do have some public statements from some of the individuals around trump on that day and days prior to the insurrection. here's john eastman right

his attorney provided a letter saying mr. clarkdicial decision, but for now he must decline to testify. clark's complete failure to cooperate today is unacceptable. we need the information that he is withholding and we are willing to take strong measures to hold him to his obligation. we have a national correspondent of politico who has been reporting on his deposition and she joins me now. betsy, do you have any sense of how the deposition itself went after the letter? >> that's right, the deposition clearly went quite badly. clark was in that room with his lawyer for no longer than 90 minutes. we know clark and his lawyer delivered this letter that i obtained to members of the committee and we can say with a high degree of confidence that committee investigators were not particularly impressed. the gist of this letter that i read and that we have published at politico is that because trump has tried to use executive privilege to block other people from playing ball with the select committee, that means that jeffrey clark, additio

it looks like the evidence suggests that mr. clarkto try and launch a coup. and he angled to even replace the acting attorney general. clark was a relatively low-level person but he tried to angle with trump to replace and run the justice department, and indeed so much so that it said that the entire senior leadership of the justice department voted for him to resign because of clark and what he was trying to do and steal the election. so when you look at madison and the federalist paper, about how men aren't angels, there's a picture of jeff clark. i mean, this is someone who has really got to go and tell the truth about what happened because his role looks really, really serious and it's certainly not something protected by executive privilege. >> and then there's the structural questions. do you see anything coming out from all of this that suggests there should be some more concrete reform so that the doj is not as contactable, persuadable from a tyrant who wants to use it? >> there is a structural set of rules and one of my first

so, you know, congress has heard from a variety of other witnesses who refused those by mr. clarknd now we need to go straight to the horse's mouth. >> except that jeffrey clark never gave that deposition. he showed up but he didn't cooperate. in response, the chairman of the committee, bennie thompson, issued this statement the next day. quote, he has a very short time to reconsider and cooperate fully. we need the information that he is withholding and we're willing to take strong measures to hold him accountable to meet his obligation, end quote. it appears jeffrey clark's time is up on wednesday. the committee plans to vote on wednesday on whether or not to recommend a committee referral tore congress. katie is an msnbc contributor. jeffrey clark is someone no one has really heard about before. to the extent there was a mastermind of a clown car dumpster fire insurrection attempt, he was it. he's important for them to hear from. what happens now? >> sure, so they're going to vote to hold him in contempt and it will go to the justice department. it's very likely the justice dep

mr. clarke. hello, heidi. [ laughter ] have you been in a helicopter before?ers. but i've never been strapped into a gurney. i've never been strapped into anything without a safe word, you know? [ laughter ] >> jimmy: what is your safe word? by the way. >> matt damon. [ laughter ] [ applause ] >> jimmy: from boston, okay. >> so they're wheeling me out of the hospital. and people are, lenny, can i have a autograph? i'm strapped in! take a selfie. [ laughter ] when i was really fat i would have never fit in this helicopter. >> jimmy: what? >> oh, yeah. we get in. now they're tying stuff on me. i'm, wow, if this chopper goes down, i've got to chew through these things to save heidi. [ laughter ] that's what you think about when you're about to die. as we get up to the mass general hospital, chopper's spinning out of control, only five feet off the deck. i'm like, turn the key off! let it drop! i don't want to fall off the building. boom, we hit. he turned, lenny, it's me, freddie, i used to fly you when i flew helicopters for ernie bosh! it never ends. [ laughter

mr. clark's role in delegitimatize the election results.chool bus share what he knows. >> did you say over 250 people communicated with the investigation at this point, either given you documents or testified, 50? >> 250 interviews. there has been a ton of activity that's going on. 25,000 documents the committee is sorting through and has sorted through. there's a lot of activity, and i know that some of these names that are in the news, obviously, but an overwhelming portion of the people who we have asked to sit for interviews and folks who we have subpoenaed have come forward and have been interviewed. so we continue the make progress. chairman thompson and vice chair cheney continue to guide and lead our group in our pursuit of the truth, and we just want to make sure our fundamental goal is that this never happens again. so in order to do that, we're going to need documents and testimony and we're going to need to tell the story. >> congressman pete aguilar, democrat of california, member of the january 6th investigation. sir, thank yo

so, congress has heard from a variety of other witnesses who refused treaties by mr. clark go straight to the horse's mouth. >> except that jeffrey clark never gave that deposition. he showed up, but he didn't cooperate. in response the chairman of the committee, bennie thompson, issued the statement the next day. quote, he has a very short time to reconsider and cooperate fully. we need the information that he is withholding and we are willing to take strong measures to hold him accountable, to me his obligation, and quote. well, it appears that jeffrey clark's time is up. on wednesday, the committee plans to vote on wednesday night, whether to recommend a criminal referral for contempt of congress. joining us now is katie benner the justice department reporter for, and an innocent bc contributor. jeffrey clark is the most famous person that nobody had ever heard about, before people like you, wrote about him. to the extent that there was a mastermind of the clown car dumpster fire of an insurrection attempt. he was it. he is important for them to hear. from what happens n

mr. clark, would you said, you know? yeah, i think it was the one that i don't know what the passion nicole in the waste, you know, no one you know, go, peter will not was noticing that today. they've been stress. oh, ship with the how somebody shrinks. preferred to quibble that she is a norm. yeah. are you sure spending the course with but don't concern because this year with us not from smile. it's not that you got those to sit in the wine. yeah. yeah. that, that for choose those with the over when you bought a home or she don't want to buy books that there are because those so you can do with a dinner for your see something which makes it easier. no good to be on what it is. i received them. wow, if you want them down more days for critical illness, korea to critique to pin yet the leash that i keep opinions, the question a and that's no surprise because what they do can be extremely dangerous. the pilots never used the word last, but instead talk about then lane just flight. they went so on buttons all take pictures

mr. clark, would you said usa? no, yeah, we think a shot and you're calling the smoke about a week. no one you margaret peter will not all of them was noticing that today. they've been stress ship with people that she is a norm. yeah. are you sure spending the course with concern because this year with us not from smile. it's not that you got those to sit in the wine. yeah. you got to talk to what you thought when you bought a home or near a sheet or don't want to buy books that though, because i was still working with a dinner for just the same thing, which makes it easier. no good to be on what it is i received for the wow. is it going down more just for critical illness, korea to critique the pin? yet the mission, the critique, to bring the car to what a and that's no surprise because what they do can be extremely dangerous. the pilots never used the word last, but instead talk about then the latest flight. they went so on buttons or take pictures before a flight and always greet their blame by caressing its knows all too often quite personal rituals known only to one person. the

mr. clark, would you say, you know? yeah, missing a shot and nicole in the waste, yours? no one, you know, graffiti will not all of them was noticing that there had been stress oh, ship that you thought how somebody transferred to people that she is a norm. yeah. are you sure spending the course with concern because this year with us not once it's not that you got those to sit in there right now. you cook the doctor, choose those who thought when you bought a home or a new russian or don't want to buy books that they are because i was still working with a dinner for your so you simply wish mr. is here. he no good to be on what it is. i receive them. wow. is it going down more just the grad school. miss korea, to keep the pin yet the mission. they got you to bring up the question a and that's no surprise because what they do can be extremely dangerous. the pilots never used the word last, but instead talk about then latest flight. they went so on buttons or take pictures before a flight and always greet their plane by caressing its nose. all too often quite personal ritual

mr. clark, would you say, you know? yeah, think a shot and nicole in the smoke, but we still no one. you know, graffiti will not wallace. i'm noticing that since i had there been stress oh shit. because that's how somebody shrinks beside the people that she is a norm. yeah. are you sure spending the course with concern because this year with us not once it's not that you got those to sit in. i one. yeah, you got the doctor choose those who don't did when you bought a home with my others and that was an issue or don't want to buy books that though i was, i was still working with a dinner for your so you simply wish mr. is here? no good to be on what it is i received. a lot of them are just the grad school, miss korea, to critique the pin. yet the mission to bring up the question a. and that's no surprise because what they do can be extremely dangerous. the pilots never used the word last, but instead talk about then latest flight. they went so on buttons or take pictures before a flight, and always greet their plane by c

mr. clark, would you say, you know? yeah. a nicole in the smoke about a week. no. one you margaret. beautiful. not wallace. noticing that there have been stress. oh, ship that you thought how somebody transferred to people that she is a norm? yeah. are you sure spending the core should be seen this we but don't concern because this year with us not from smile. it's not that you got those to sit in. i one yeah, you group the doctor, choose those with all of i did when you get, i'm here through you up with my others and that there was a new rush or don't with our because those still working with a dinner for just the same thing which makes it easier. no good to be on what it is. i received a go at them, and we're just the grad school miss korea to critique the pin. yet the mission critique a and that's no surprise because what they do can be extremely dangerous. the pilots never used the word last, but instead talk about then lane just flight. they went so on buttons or take pictures before a flight, and always greet their blame by caressing its knows all too often quite personal ritu

mr. clark would just send, you know, yeah, a shot and nicole english woke up. what are we still? no one you, margaret peter will not. all of them was noticing that today. they've been stress. oh, ship the dogs, how somebody transferred to people that she is a norm. yeah. are you sure spending the course with concern because this year with us not the one. it's not that you got those to sit in the right now. you cooked at that for choose those with all of i did when you bought a home with my others and that was in your shoes or the most that books are because i was still working with a dinner for just the same thing, which makes it easier no good to be i'm what is i received furthermore, huh. is it going down more? does the grad school in this career? tricky the pin. yet the mission, they got you to bring up the question a and that's no surprise because what they do can be extremely dangerous. the pilots never used the word last, but instead talk about then lane just flight. they went so on buttons all take pictures before a flight and always greet their blame by caressing its know

mr. clark, would you say, you know? yeah. a nicole in the smoke, but we still no one, you know, graffiti will not was noticing that there, there been stress. oh, ship that you thought how somebody transferred to people that she is a norm? yeah. are you sure spending the course based in 3 bathrooms concerned because this year with us not from smile. it's not that you got those to sit and i one yeah, you group the doctor, choose those with all of i did when you bought a home with my others and that was in your shoes or don't want to buy books. i those so yeah. with ah, with the for your so you simply wish mr. is here. he no good. cbm was with his i received, filed them. wow. is it going down more just the grad school, miss korea, to critique the pin. yet the mission critique appears to crush the little box, and that's no surprise because what they do can be extremely dangerous. the pilots never use the word last, but instead talk about then linguist flight. they went so on buttons or take pictures before a flight and always gre

what mr clark had to talk i about there was marketing, it was not science, and to hear the ceo of thisr many years, for— the evidence that has been used not only against michael but against hundreds . of defendants around - the country, it's outrageous. all chant: i can't breathe! following the death of george floyd in may last year, the use of shotspotter became even more controversial as trust in the police was at an all—time low. we need to steer them away from technology and to the people. in chicago, activists argue the tech is disproportionately deployed in black and brown communities, so could be dispatching police to neighbourhoods where they think a gunshot has been fired, guns drawn, when, in fact, there has not been. like, we might not get the answers that we want. alyxandra is overseeing today's meeting and wants chicago's shotspotter contract to be cancelled. it's sending police in to, like, these situations that they expect to be hostile, they expect there to be a gun. because, again, of like, where this is deployed, they are expecting a black or latinx person to be holdi

mr. clarkwhat can you tell us? is price inflation eating into holiday spending? what do you expect this season? >> well, we're right in the middle of what we call "turkey five, "which is between thanksgiving and cyber monday, and we're off to a great start. we had a record-breaking brack friday, and we're seeing customers engage-- it's really interesting to see how customers are spending in this first

mr. clark, good morning to you. >> good morning. >> brennan: from where you sit, what can you tell us? is price inflation eating into holiday spending? what do you expect this season? >> well, we're right in the middle of what we call "turkey five, "which is between thanksgiving and cyber monday, and we're off to a great start. we had a record-breaking brack friday, and we're seeing customers engage-- it's really interesting to see how customers are spending in this first postvaccine holiday as we start to come back together. and as you might expect, consumers are spending on things like apparel. we're seeing a lot of uptick in denim and dresses. we're seeing a lot of things like home decor, particularly in our holiday decor, which is showing i think families and friends are preparing to come back together, as they just did at thanksgiving, and plan to do in the christmas holidays. we continue to see spend on things like toys, lot of kids are going to have a good visit from santa this holiday s

mr. clark's claim of privilege and rejected it. ery short time to reconsider and cooperate fully. the statement doesn't say that committee is considering a criminal contempt referral of clark. thompson said earlier in the day that is something that the on the table. ryan nobles, cnn, capitol hill. >>> key law enforcement agencies are sounding the alarm over the potential damage domestic drone strike could do. warning comes from a bulletin obtained by cnn. it says a drone crashed a pennsylvania station was meant to damage the electrical equipment. the damage was the done. it's still not clear who was responsible. it's the first known case of a drone being used to specifically target infrastructure in the u.s. authorities are sending the bulletins to state and local officials to raise awareness about the first-hand and the threats posed by drones. >>> a u.s. air force veteran and founder of p3 tech consulting, joins me now from colorado springs. thanks so much for being here with us. first of all, what more you can tell us about the d

meadows, mr. clark or any others. >> you said there were communications. mean there's some cooperation or is it just communication? can you describe that? can you see getting to a point where you won't refer for criminal charges? >> i can't talk specifically about a particular witness. with a variety of witnesses we've had engagement with them through counsel, some like bannon flatly refused to cooperate. others like clark who came in, refused to answer questions and still others that we've been in communication with so it varies witness to witness but we discuss with legal counsel what is the appropriate step to get the american people information. we intend to hold public hearings again soon to bring the public along with us and show what we're learning in real time. we'll make decisions soon. >> a federal judge overseeing some of the january 6 cases he said in a court hearing this month that the rioters that day were "called to washington, d.c., by an elected official prompted to walk to the capitol by an elected official, those who created the conditio

meadows, mr. clark>> and cnn senior legal analyst and former attorney preet perar joins us now. preet, meadows and bannon are both trying to hide under trump's umbrella. >> of the entire universe of people that the committee wants to talk to, steve bannon, among the folks who have asserted some kind of privilege, was in the weakest provision. in other lay terms, he wasn't even in the building leading up to january 6. mark meadows has some details potentially, but that needs to be worked out with the committee. my sense is he doesn't want to get ahead of bennie thompson, but they use steve bannon as someone they are pursuing criminally to make the case for mark meadows, you better be forthcoming. if there are things you think are privileged, maybe there is some oaccommodation that can be made, but lots of things that mark meadows heard, saw or communicated are clearly not in the privilege. >> and they are clearly important to getting to the bottom of january 6. that is the question i have been wrestling

mr. clark's boss to testify. it is really tough to maintain that there is any sort of a privilege. client privilege but he wasn't president trump's lawyer or alone in the room giving legal advice. so clark really gives every appearance of someone that just does not want to talk to the committee and forces us to contemplate the question what is it he is trying to hide. >> there is so much news it would have been easy to miss the steele dossier -- >> i would defer to joyce for that. one media pundit made a comment saying one person that was a contributor to the christopher steele dossier, may have misled the department of justice. you know, nothing actually comes out in the investigation that says that everything that we have discussed over multiple years of the president of the united states campaign, chairman giving election material to a known russian spy who passed it on to a russian oligarc, that has nothing to do with this. trump siding with the dictator of russian over u.s. intelligence. the durham investigation is an interesting animal, set up by donald trump to find dirt on t

>> i think the most important questions to ask mr. clarkolve around his specific interactions with others at the department of justice and at the white house. both the president, the vice president, the white house counsel, the acting attorney general jeff rosen. the details of what he tried to do are still obscure, certainly within the department of justice. we have a good paper record. but hearing his version of what he was attempting to accomplish and why would lay a baseline for further inquiry. >> in terms of that baseline, how important is this interview in your mind, overall, based on what we know publicly about where this could lead? >> well, i think the attempt to politicize the department of justice was probably the single most dangerous effort by president trump in the post election time. the idea of the department of justice actively interfering in state electoral actions in the way that clark was advancing should scare every american. and but for the apparent real bravery of people like jeff rosen and pat rejected that, we may

mr. clark's complete failure to cooperate is unacceptable.ump and his team have been trying to block the january 6th committee from obtaining more than 750 pages of

so what mr. clarkr deputy undersecretary and i, we are the executive champions and standing up orca and it has been a different direction than we had before and at this point we expect anticipate that orca will be up underneath mr. clark in the field operations as really is a compliance and accountability arm to work with the field. still work in progress friedrich maybe later this fiscal year or early next year, there has been a working group with detailed employees including senior executive over saying at. for several months now. >> thank you and recently we were briefed on enjoy executive council oversight of vha and bba efforts for the sexual harassment and assault how does this differ with orca as well as the working group mentioned in the response letter that i sent in march braided several hundred groups working in parallel and how the work together and work to the differences are pretty. >> i think that is a demonstration of the va broad commitment that and him and many levels to help and assi

mr. clark's claim of privilege and rejected it. y short time to reconsider and cooperate fully. and the question tonight, wolf, will the committee take the step of criminal contempt against jeffrey clark? >> for weeks, the january 6th select committee has been trying to talk to this man. >> good morning. i'm jeff clark. i'm the head of the civil division. >> reporter: jeffrey clark, a former trump-era department of justice official, was seen in this exclusive video friday morning entering a house office building to answer questions from the committee. the meeting did not last long. committee chairman bennie thompson said clark did not answer any questions. >> my understanding is he did not cooperate. and we will look forward after our meeting this afternoon as to next steps. i have as chair the ability to rule on some of the issues that were raised. >> reporter: one of those steps could be a criminal contempt referral of congress. clark is a key figure in the january 6th probe. a trump loyalist, who peddled false claims about electi

meadows, mr. clarkothers. >> reporter: schiff said they'll make a decision about meadows this week and possibly others. the committee has actually subpoenaed more witnesses just this week including roger stone and alec jones. alex? >> thank you, julie, for that. >>> murder convictions against three men in the killing of ahmaud arbery in georgia represent just the beginning in the pursuit of justice in this case. travis mcmichael, his father, gregory mcmichael and william bryan will be sentenced in a matter of weeks. joining us now is al sharpton. you were closely involved in this case. you were wearing your hat as the head of the national action network but looking ahead, does it feel to you like there's a long road yet to be traveled? >> definitely the road is certainly not ended. you have the federal hate charges that will be moving forward and then, of course, all three defendants have announced they're going to appeal the conviction that they just all were given in the state trial that just conclude

profitability and growing revenues and eps it has not missed since july 2018 >> all right jim, you're up >> mr. clarkvice and thank you for your support of the show which is well known to all of us. my answer is look at the next year as a relay race use energy, xle and that will only last about six months or so and then i want you to switch to faang and if you need one faang name you can use apple. >> we'll take a quick break and jon has unusual activity and how investors should be vitinagang the next big market theme, the metaverse. we'll be back right after this i go to work. ♪♪ strength isn't a given. it's grown. it's earned and tested. ♪♪ we all have the strength to see what's possible. it's up to us to unlock it. tonal. be your strongest. this is the new world of work. each day looks different it's u than the last.ck it. but, whatever work becomes, the world works with servicenow. esg is responsible investing. who's responsible for building esg into your investments? at pgim, the pursuit is on for outperformance. as active investors, to outdeliver with customized strategies, integrating esg best

. >> leigh ann, is there any chance that mr. clarkttee before tomorrow night? are they in active communication or is this inevitable -- does it look like we're on an inevitable contempt charge. >> there's always a chance but it looks like it's on that inevitable path. jeffrey clark appeared before the committee several weeks ago, but in that appearance he cooperated zero. and so he has publicly presented himself, but he hasn't given them anything that they want. and so it looks like that's the path. of course anything can change. you know, this is a question for pete, that actually our team was talking about. what sort of legal ramifications does he have for his bar license should it go down this path. we didn't know if that was going to be something that would discourage him from doing that. but it seems like the vote will take place tomorrow night in the house and it will go -- or in the committee and then it will go to the full house, chuck. >> pete williams, leigh ann caldwell, two separate parts of the january 6 story. thank you

mr. clark's complete failure to cooperate is unacceptable. the disgraced former president himself donald trump and his team have been trying to block the january 6th committee from obtaining more than 750 pages of documents from the national archives, but on thursday they argued their case before a federal judge in d.c. who seemed skeptical of the trump team's request to withhold records from the committee. even as the january 6th committee makes progress, the defense has not stopped. they just look different than january 6th. seven republicans who were at the january 6th rally just got elected to office on tuesday. these seven republicans will soon be part of local politics across new jersey, pennsylvania, connecticut and idaho and they all traveled to d.c. under the false premise that the 2020 election was stolen. peddlers of the big lie have been reckless with our democracy. they've laid the groundwork for the republican party's past, present and future election delusions. in deposition videos obtained by cnn rudy giuliani said under oath,

let me read you what the chairman of the one-sixth commission said mr. clark time to reconsider and cooperate fully. we need the information he's withholding and we're willing to take strong measures to hold him accountable to meet his obligation. so i think that, you know, he should expect to get subpoenaed again. let's go back to rudy giuliani for a second. you know, tim, i'll give you and this is a fun one. the four seasons landscaping company was one of rudy giuliani's darkest moments and funniest moments. there is a documentary on msnbc we're running about it. take a look. >> i got a phone call from my son anthony and he said mom, this is bigger than we think and he sends me a picture while i'm talking to him. and rudy is sitting at my desk and a plaque in front of my desk says boss lady. i told my husband, we got to get over there. >> i wonder if you think his entire reputation that stemmed from his handling of 9/11 was as much a fraud in someways as donald trump's because i think people have been surprised by how sort of low he sunk unless people like m

mr. clark i know you have a really busy night. >> rachel, thanks for the invitation. >> i feel like as soon as i saw that, i wanted to talk to you about it because i feel like you have hit something that has been driving me crazy for a long time, which is the last point you made, we'll hold a politician accountable if they say something vile once but not if they do it every day. and the reason we don't do that is because of the word "new" in news, it becomes the same old same old thing, with people who have made that their stock in trade. i wanted to know if you felt like you had a proposed solution to this, in addition to just the diagnosis. >> i don't have a proposed solution. we have some ideas. and we're engaging our community in colorado to find a better way forward. but it seemed to me like we could no longer wait to acknowledge the problem until we had a solid solution, because the problem, the fact that we will hold an elected official accountability if they say something vile once but

mr. clark's complete failure to cooperate -- he was testifying before the committee.e considered his claims of privilege and have rejected it. we need the information that he is with holding and we are willing to take strong measures to hold him accountable to meet his obligation. this nonsense continues in front of a congressionally mandated committee charged with getting to the bottom of what happened on january 6th. people go there and number their nose at this process. >> you are absolutely right, ali, and i cannot imagine how we're letting it happen, but bannon certainly stone waled and he hasn't been held accountable yet. he was voted in contempt by congress, but he hasn't been indicted. until he is, others will continue to follow in the path. there is no legal defense to jeffrey clark and actually i don't think anybody heard of him until after the january 3rd meeting that he had at the department of justice when his name started coming out as someone who was trying to overturn the election, and i am one of those who believes very much that we need to have accou

mr. clarkyou've got a really busy night. >> rachel, thanks for the invitation. >> i feel like, as soon as i saw that i wanted to talk to you about it. because i feel like you've hit something that has been driving me crazy for a long time. which is, the last point that you made, if will hold the politician accountable if they say something vial once, we won't do it if they do it every day. and the reason, of course, as you know, the reason we don't do that is because of the word new in news. it becomes the same old, same old thing in members of congress, with some members of congress, with some elected officials who made up their stock in trade. i wanted to know if you felt like you had a proposed solution to this, in addition to the diagnosis. >> i don't have a proposed solution. we have some ideas. and we are engaging our community in colorado to find a better way forward. but it seemed to me like we could no longer waits to acknowledge the problem, until we had a solid solution. because the

these five regional offices and in speaking with our deputy undersecretary for field operations, mr. clark, he assures me that the training is completed before the work is routed to those individuals. mr. mrvan: finally, in my past experience i managed a bensen aireo where case managers worked with clients on benefits and when you mentioned to me that certain protocols were not followed based on getting second signatures, that is specifically tailored to training and availability and technologies that could correct that any way as a member of this committee could assist you in the vitality of making sure those corrections are made so things don't fall through the cracks based on human error, when it comes to m.s.t., it's very important so we'd like to assist you and let you no know we're here for you. ms. murphy: thank you very much. mr. mrvan: thank you. i yield back. chairman luria: i now recognize mr. luis. mr. luis: as a emergency physician i know the barriers survivors of sexual assault face in getting the help and support they need. we're having this hearing today because the v.a. ha

mr. nick clark as in the scottish highlands, where forcing oil platforms wait for either the contracts or to be decommissioned chromarty for the kind of barometer of the state of the you case oil and gas industry because when there's a down. so it gets pretty crowded in here, as unused rigs are brought in from the north sea and a weight new contracts. back in 2019 new case, oil and gas all authority estimated there were between 10 to 20000000 barrels of oil left to be recovered in the north sea. and indeed, as we speak as a bid underway to open up the john camber oil field, about 250 kilometers north of here, around the shetland islands. for the truth is, as the move away from fossil fuels gathers momentum fights like this will become more and more common for there still clearly a very, very long way to go at the you and climate conference in glasgow delegates there are still digesting the news or the emissions nearly back to pre pandemic levels and still increasing. but there is some good news to on the 1.5 degrees celsius target. remember before the conference, we were heading for 3.7 d

mr. clark, thank you very much for joining us tonight.right now looking at the returns in your district? >> yes, you got it right. we're up by 13. >> how are you feeling about the prospects tonight? obviously your race is an important one. every race in the house of delegates tonight is important. but these governorships -- the governorship returns tonight are pretty spooky for democrats thinking that the prospect there may be a republican governor elected tonight in your state. >> yeah, definitely we're still hopeful. we've got some early votes that still is coming in. you know, we're still staying optimistic. we ran a great campaign. democrats up and down the ballot. and i'm hoping that turnout will come out and results will give us what we're looking for. but we're still ready to fight for these great causes democrats have been fighting for up and down the ballot. there's so much still on the line. we're still keeping our fingers crossed and hoping for the best tonight. but it's looking like -- i believe terry will pull it off once the

mr. clark will handle the other issues.n assessing subject matter jurisdiction, this court asked us to prepare to answer two questions today. the first is whether this court and the district court have jurisdiction notwithstanding the limitations on the presidential records act. the second is whether the court's jurisdiction over the remedies sought by the appellant

we will take that up in the business committee tomorrow based on what mr. clark has done thus far. are suggestions that the house, contempt referral to the department of justice. he has been so far unwilling to engage in any fruitful discussions and claimed both executive privilege and privilege when he was in front of us. so this is something that obviously we haven't seen and would expect a better level of engagement from someone who's a former department of justice official. >> when it comes to the d.c. court of appeals before the former president's lawyers to keep secret records that could provide insight into his actions on the day of the insurrection, the lead up to the insurrection, those arguments i'm sure you heard today, met with skepticism by the three presiding judges. their comments. who decides when it is in the best interest of the united states to disclose presidential records? the current occupant or former? we have a conflict of incumbent or former. another one. we have one president at a time under our constitution. do you expect hearing all of that, the courts t