i know you want to say something, mr. clegg. but you know when it comes to fighting the war on terror, the fact of the matter is that great britain and france are going through this similar situation right now where they have groups within the countries that are he's pousing radical ideas. they just expelled someone, i think, great britain, today, yesterday. i don't know when national security starts and individual liberties begin. what's your thought? >> i want to endorse what some of my co-panelists have said that it's very important in the war on terror that we have the cooperation of the overwhelming majority of individual americans, arab americans and muslim americans. >> don't you think one of the greatest strengths of our country is that even though home grown terrorism is on the rides, generally speaking, american muslims have assimilated in our society and our culture, thousands serve in the military, and that we're actually an example in the world how you assimilate? >> no, i think that's right. stereotyping is very da

i think i'm at the end of my five minutes, anyway. >> you this, mr. clegg. david harris, associate dean for research at the university of pittsburgh law school. he's one of the nation's leading scholars on racial profiling. author of the book in 2000 "profiles in injustice," why "racial profiling cannot work." and in 2005, "good cops, kay case point of view for preventive policing." professor harris appeared at both of the previous senator hearings on racial profiling. so welcome back. >> thank you very much, senator durbin, members of the subcommittee. i'm grateful for the chance to talk to you today. senator durbin's statement opened by recalling for us president bush's promise that racial profiling, quote, is wrong and we will end it in america. sad to say that that promise remains as yet unfulfilled. instead, we have a continuation of profiling as it existed then with a new overlapping second wave of profiling in the wake of september 11th, as other witnesses have described. directed mostly at arab americans and muslims. now we have a third overlapping w

more complicated today, as mr. clegg has said, because the war on terror raises legitimate concerns about the safety of our nation and how far will we go to respect our national security, without violating our basic values under the constitution. i thank you all for your testimony. it's been very positive part of this conversation, which we freed tone gauneed to engage in further. there's a lot of interest in today's hearings bp 225 organizations submitted testimony. thank goodness they didn't come leer to speak, but we're glad to have their testimony and will put it in the record without objection. that's good. it will include the episcopal church, coalition for immigrant refugee rights, japanese-american citizens league, leadership conference on human rights, muslim advocates, naacp. national immigration forum. rights working group sic coalition and poverty law center and these statements will be made part of the record kept open for a week for additional statements. it's possible someone will send you a written questi

mr. clegg's office being furious, mr. cables, is being unacceptable, that must though be a reference to mr. cables remarks that he wanted, he wanted to declare war on murdoch? >> or that he had. i think it was, it was an exposure of acute bias, i mentioned earlier. >> page 42, 01683, we are now christmas eve. mr. michel, you and others, mr. michel just spoke to jh, must have spoken to mr. hunter directly. this is the last of the communications which is mr. hunter directly, according to mr. michel's witness statement, that he was very happy to meet to be point of contact with them. add-on is special adviser to mr. hunter on behalf of jr am going forward. very important to avoid giving the anti-any opportunity -- to affect the process and find that political level, while also legal teams are in touch. so to be clear, by the series mr. hunt is now being seized with response before making a decision, hadn't he? >> yeah, that's right. and my understanding is this is, we have sought to understand what the right way to liaise wi

more complicated today, as mr. clegg has said, because the war on terror raises legitimate concerns about the safety of our nation and how far will we go to respect our national security, without violating our basic values under the constitution. i thank you all for your testimony. it's been very positive part of this conversation, which we freed tone gauneed to engage in further. there's a lot of interest in today's hearings bp 225 organizations submitted testimony. thank goodness they didn't come leer to speak, but we're glad to have their testimony and will put it in the record without objection. that's good. it will include the episcopal church, coalition for immigrant refugee rights, japanese-american citizens league, leadership conference on human rights, muslim advocates, naacp. national immigration forum. rights working group sic coalition and poverty law center and these statements will be made part of the record kept open for a week for additional statements. it's possible someone will send you a written questi

more complicated today, as mr. clegg has said, because the war on terror raises legitimate concerns about the safety of our nation and how far will we go to respect our national security, without violating our basic values under the constitution. i thank you all for your testimony. it's been very positive part of this conversation, which we freed tone gauneed to engage in further. there's a lot of interest in today's hearings bp 225 organizations submitted testimony. thank goodness they didn't come leer to speak, but we're glad to have their testimony and will put it in the record without objection. that's good. it will include the episcopal church, coalition for immigrant refugee rights, japanese-american citizens league, leadership conference on human rights, muslim advocates, naacp. national immigration forum. rights working group sic coalition and poverty law center and these statements will be made part of the record kept open for a week for additional statements. it's possible someone will send you a written questi

mr. clegg's office being furious, mr. cables, is being unacceptable, that must though be a reference to mr. cables remarks that he wanted, he wanted to declare war on murdoch? >> or that he had. i think it was, it was an exposure of acute bias, i mentioned earlier. >> page 42, 01683, we are now christmas eve. mr. michel, you and others, mr. michel just spoke to jh, must have spoken to mr. hunter directly. this is the last of the communications which is mr. hunter directly, according to mr. michel's witness statement, that he was very happy to meet to be point of contact with them. add-on is special adviser to mr. hunter on behalf of jr am going forward. very important to avoid giving the anti-any opportunity -- to affect the process and find that political level, while also legal teams are in touch. so to be clear, by the series mr. hunt is now being seized with response before making a decision, hadn't he? >> yeah, that's right. and my understanding is this is, we have sought to understand what the right way to liaise wi