mr. collier? >> sure. >> let's assume that the court strikes down the lifetime lease but not the moratorium. >> right. >> under this poison pill -- if i may call it that -- there would be no conversions until the 10 year moratorium expires. is that right? >> yes, the balance of the ordinance. >> and when the lottery would come back it would come back with the new rules minus the lifetime lease since that was struck down. >> if the court interpreted that as being seferable, yes. >> that means five or six unit buildings let's say in the 2013 lottery are effectively permanently banned from converting assuming they couldn't get the tenant map within six months of filing of the lawsuit. >> correct. we're talking about changing the rules in 2024. we're not talking about changing the rules in a year from now because the rules -- they are only allowed to convert through an expedited process if the lifetime leases and moratorium are upheld. that's the balance otherwise there would be no legislation. >> rig

mr. collier and others given the increase in owner occupancy which i am willing to support in the legislation, i think that it makes sense to allow there to be transfers of ownership and under what i am proposing it couldn't be more frequently than three years so you don't see the continual transfer of ownership. i know people for many reasons are living in any kind of housing situation at times need to move or need to sell and under the current version before us if you are in theoretical future lottery for eight or 10 years -- let's say it's a three-four unit building any change by any of the occupants for any of the unending reasons that people need to move or sell would put them to the back of the line and given that we're increasing owner occupancy i think this is an appropriate change to accompany that increasing owner occupancy that we're requiring so what i would request is that we duplicate the file and put this amendment into one but not the other. continue both because i understand it must be continued under president chiu's amendments so in two week when is we come back we can forw

mr. chairman. i find this to be an overwhelming experience. i think it is important to call the names, we should always take a moment to recognize them. collier,indsay, sean and krystall. we should take a moment to recognize them. i want to proceed with enormous thanks, commissioner davis, for the leadership and heroics of everybody in boston. many of us have worked with officers. we thank you and we think the people of boston and your great state, the commonwealth of massachusetts. i want to pursue, senator lieberman, we are limited in this time frame, but the russian contact. it baffles all of us, in spite of diplomacy, why if nothing --se, it was not a trigger and center,oint terrorism to share that information with local law enforcement. what do you think happened? >> i agree with you. hindsight is always clearer. this was an unusual circumstance to notify us. it includes the mother of tsarnaevy.-- the brother initially. we understand that we are operating in the context of mistrust and there is cooperation in some areas. it seems to me that the fact that this a original notification, you investigate what went wrong. at what point could s