mr. conway? >> no. >> mr. conway, no. mr. thorntonbury? >> no. >> no. big, no, no, no. mr. rooney, no. mr. gibbs, no. yes. mr. gibson, no. mr. sutherland, no. mr. crawford? >> no. >> mr. crawford, no. mrs. heelscamp, no.

mr. conway. mr. conway, no. mr. thompson? >> no. >> mr. thompson, no. mr. rooney? >> no. >> mr. guzman, no. >> mr. gibbs. >> no. >> mr. gibbs, no. mr. sutherland. >> no. >> mr. sutherland, no. mr. crawford. >> no. >> mr. crawford, no. >> no. >> mr. gibson? >> yes. >> mr. gibson, yes. no. no. >> mr. schilling? >> yes. >> mr. schilling, yes. >> mr. ribble? >> no. >> mr. peterson? >> no. >> mr. peterson, no. mr. holden, no. >> mr. mcintire, yes. >> yes. yes. mr. clayton? >> no. >> mr. costa? >> yes. >> mr. walls? >> yes. >> mr. straiter? >> yes. >> mr. kissle? >> yes. >> mr. owings? >> yes. >> mr. kingery, yes. yes. yes. yes. mr. johnson, no. mr. king? >> no. >> mr. king, no. mr. kardosa? mr. chairman? >> no. >> mr. chairman, no. the vote is 18 ayes, 26 nays. >> amendment number 29 is not accepted. >> i have an amendment. >> what is the number? >> it's number 12 on broad band. >> the clerk will distribute amendment number 12. the gentleman may begin his explanation when he's prepared. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i appreciate the bipartisan leadership that's been brought to this bil

mr. conway? >> no. >> mr. conway, no. mr. thorntonbury? >> no. >> no. big, no, no, no. mr. rooney, no. mr. gibbs, no. yes. mr. gibson, no. mr. sutherland, no. mr. crawford? >> no. >> mr. crawford, no. mrs. heelscamp, no. mr. gibson? >> yes. >> mr. holgrin? >> no. >> -- is this. >> this agriculture markup started at 10:00 eastern this morning and could go until 9:00 tonight. the legislation reduces spending by $1.6 million our live coverage of a markup is using to the companion network, c-span 2. in a few moments, a discussion of the tax provisions of the 2010 health care law. and in an hour and a half, a hearing on state and federal cooperation on border security. >> when you realized they were trying to escape really into the west, that's when he collapsed, when he felt he realized finally it had come to an end. his main priority is not to be captured by the russians. he was afraid of being ridiculed. so he was determined to die. >> now a discussion of the tax provisions of the 2010 health care law. this is an hour and a half. >> for the next hour and a half or so, we're going to look

mr. conway -- >> no. >> mr. conawway -- >> no. >> mrs. schmidt? no. mr. thompson? mr. thompson, no. mr. rooney? mr. rooney, no. mr. stusman, no. mr. gibbs, mr. gibbs, no. mr. tipton? mr. tipton, yes. mr. sutherland. mr. sutherland, no. mr. crawford? mr. crawford, no. mrs. robey? mrs. robey, no. mr. hulescamp, no. mrs. elmers? mr. gibson? >> yes. >> mr. gibson, yes. mr. hultgren, no. mrs. hartsler, no. mr. shilling? mr. shilling, no. mr. ribble? mr. ribble, no. mrs. nome? mrs. nome, no. mr. peterson? mr. holden? mr. holden, no. mr. mcentire? >> no. >> mr. mcintyre, no. mr. boswell? mr. bacca? yes. mr. car doze za. mr. david scott, yes. mr. quayar, yes. mr. costa? mr. costa, yes. mr. walls, mr. walls, yes. mr. schrader, mr. schrader, yes. mr. kissle, mr. kissle, yes. mr. owens, mr. owens, yes. miss pingree? miss pingree, yes. mr. courtney? >> yes. >> mr. courtney, yes. mr. welch? mr. welch, yes. miss fudge? mr. sublon? mr. sublon, yes. miss sewell? miss sewell, yes. mr. mcgovern? mr. mcgovern, yes. mr. goodlatte? mr. goodlatte, no. mr. johnson? mr. johnson, no. mr. naugabauer? mr. naugaba

mr. conway, h.p., sf-city. this is an incredible accomplishment. and i want to thank our new officers. this is a sight for sore eyes. this is what mayor leigh made possible through his work with the board of supervisors. this information technology is going to them. they are more second knowledge sandovaly. look at them. they are younger. they were raised on laptops. i want to thank everybody for being here and making this possible. thanks. [applause] >> i want to reasure everybody that even though we couldn't share information, we are a very chatty police department, and we told everybody what happened the day before. our next speaker is no stranger to really anything that is progressive in the bay area. he has been a great friend to the city and to me, and that would be ron conway, chairperson of s.f.-city. [applause] >> thank you. it is an honor to be here. i represent sf-city, which is an organization that i founded in january. it is kind of a product of the election of ed leigh as mayor of san francisco and more specific engagement in the city. sf-city has approaching 300 member c

mr. conway, h.p., sf-city. this is an incredible accomplishment. and i want to thank our new officers. this is a sight for sore eyes. this is what mayor leigh made possible through his work with the board of supervisors. this information technology is going to them. they are more second knowledge sandovaly. look at them. they are younger. they were raised on laptops. i want to thank everybody for being here and making this possible. thanks. [applause] >> i want to reasure everybody that even though we couldn't share information, we are a very chatty police department, and we told everybody what happened the day before. our next speaker is no stranger to really anything that is

mr. conway recognized for two minutes to explain his amendment number 34. >> thank you, mr. chairman. my good friend and i present this amendment. this amendment simply put an end to the rulemaking plaguing cattle producers for more than two years. aware of the fact that the -- rulemaking went well beyond the language of 2008 farm bill and threaten l the livestock and poultry market. in particular threat to end the value added marketing opportunity producers use to satisfy their customers remain profitable. i want to thank him for cooperating with the amendment with me it impacts producers across the country. to kill the issue once and for all and allow them to get back to fighting back. >> who seeks recognition on the topic? >> mr. chairman. the ranking member seeks recognition. >> i move to strike the last word. >> recognized two for minutes. >> what this does is repeals what we did in 2008, the farm bill, he said it was another situation write locked him in the room, and dhaim to an agreement. it also repeals a role of the secretary is finalized since 2008, and prohibits the secret