mr. cooper. mr. cooper votes no. mr. turner? mr. turner votes aye. ms. berdaio? she votes no. mr. klein? mr. klein votes aye. mr. courtney? mr. courtney? mr. rodgers? mr. rodgers? ms. tsonag votes no. mr. garamendi? mr. garamendi votes no. mr. schuster? mr. schuster? mr. johnson? mr. johnson votes no. mr. conoway? mr. conoway votes aye. ms. speer? ms. speer votes no. mr. lamborn? mr. lamborn votes aye. mr. castro? mr. castro votes no. mr. whitman? mr. whitman votes aye. ms. duckworth? ms. duckworth votes no. mr. hunter? mr. hunter votes aye. mr. peters? mr. peters votes no. dr. fleming? dr. fleming votes aye. mr. vissi? mr. vissi votes no. mr. kauffman votes aye. ms. gabbard? ms. gabbard votes no. mr. gibson? mr. gibson votes no. mr. walls? mr. walls votes no. ms. hartzler? ms. hartzler votes aye. mr. o'rourke votes no. dr. heck? dr. heck votes no. mr. nor cross? mr. nor cross votes no. mr. scott? mr. scott votes aye. mr. gallego votes no. mr. brooks votes aye. mr. takai? mr. takai votes no. mr. nuj envotes aye. ms. graham? ms. gram vogt no. mr. cook votes aye. mr. ashford? mr. as

mr. cooper what is your response? >> guest: that's what they always say. you have to be able to protected and the answer is the way the order is written in the way the laws written you will protect the quality. you will protect privacy radio protect the advertising stream and letting people connect which is exactly what's been the issue with the home recording industry. they want to stop dvr and they want to stop mp3 players. under the copyright laws they can defend themselves. they have won all those cases. the court has never let them dictate technology to did protect their copyright and for us that's a critical point. they win the court cases in the marketplace just opens the system up because there is a lot of value in consumer choice. this is exactly the same thing. it has worked so many times that the question is should we experiment and they answer is absolutely yes. if the go fund me can close the door. they honestly believe it won't go wrong because of that experience. >> guest: it has gone wrong and the telephone marketing edge remember the reaso

mr. cooper, what do you think about what the fcc has proposed? >> guest: we think we need competition in the set-top box market. the '96 act that we want competition, competition, competition, some places it's worked, some places it hasn't, this is one place where it really hasn't, and we think consumers would have lower prices and more choices if we got vigorous competition into that space. >> host: george ford. >> guest: well, the fcc's nprm asked the question whether the set-top box is competitive, the first question x. actually the first question is, is there a market for set-top boxes, and in terms of what's delivered over the cable network, no, because the set-top box is actually a component of the network. that's the most efficient way to design and deliver cable television service, so it's the cheapest way to do it, the most efficient way to do it, is so no market has developed. the companies would prefer a market if it was more efficient to do it that way. >> host: let's bring in lydia beyoud as well, she is with bloomberg bna where she

mr. cooper?>> well, agree with my colleague from alabama on many issues, i think that the sub-committee made a mistake when they adopted the franks' amendment. for those not regular attendees at our sub-committee meeting, one of the most respected leaders is admiral searing of the missile defense agency and let me repeat what rick larsson has already quoted here. his testimony. and this isn't outdated. this is as after april 14th of this year. he said, quote, i have serious concerns about the technical feasibility of the interceptors in space and i have serious concerns about the long-term affordability of a program like that. two thoughts. one, will it work. because we should be, for anything that protects america, that will work. but we should not be for pipe dreams and science fiction. and no one is better positioned than admiral searing to be a judge of this. second, and it is second, because the first thing is whether it will work, and he is at the cutting-edge of science and r&d in this. th

mr. cooper -- anderson cooper that is.ing up a springtime spaghetti that's so good, it's newsworthy. plus, we've got an exclusive first look at michael's brand-new barbecue paradise, mabel's. >> these ribs are lip-smacking. >> announcer: the fun starts right now here on "the chew." ♪ [ cheers and applause ] >> hey, everybody. welcome to "th

mr. cooper, what do you think about what the fcc has proposed? : we think we need competition. some places it has worked, some places it has not. this is one place where it really hasn't. consumers would have low prices and more choices if we had competition. host: george? asked thed: they question if these set-top boxes competitive. the first question is there a market for set-top boxes? the answer really come in terms of what is delivered over the cable network, no. the set-top box is actually a component of the network. that is the most efficient way to design and deliver cable television service. it is the cheapest way to do it. the most efficient. the companies would prefer a market if it was more efficient. host: let's bring lydia beyoud in she is with bloomberg. up, kevinfollow wheeler come in introducing this idea said he wants to open up this market and make it more where consumers can buy their own devices like with mobile phones, tvs, and other electronics. do either of you think there is something similar or different to that analogy that would make it such this pro

mr. cooper, what you think about what the fcc has proposed? >> guest: we think we need competition in the set-top box market. and 96 act said we want competition, competition, competition. some places it's worked, some as a. this is one place where really hasn't and we think consumers would have lower prices and more choices if we got some vigorous competition into that space. >> host: george ford? >> guest: the fcc's nprm asked the question was not the set-top boxes were competitive, the first question. actually the first question is is there a market for set-top boxes? the answer really concerned about is delivered over the cable network, no, because the set-top box is actually a component of the network. that's the most efficient way to design and deliver cable television service so it's the cheapest way to do, the most efficient way. that companies would prefer a market. >> guest: let's bring lydia beyoud in. she's our guest reporter this week and she is with bloomberg where she covers telecommunications. >> thank you. to follow up on both

mr. barr: as we continue to pray for these families, i'd like to ask congressman roe and congressman cooper to join me and for all of my colleagues to stand and please join us in a moment of silence and prayer to honor these young american eople. thank you, mr. speaker. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from kentucky yields back. for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? without objection, the gentlewoman is recognized for ne minute. >> thank you, mr. speaker. today i rise to recognize florida state university for the important research they're conducting into the deadly zika virus. in coordination with johns hopkins and emery universities, florida state researchers have made crucial breakthroughs that will be useful in slowing our preventing the virus from spreading. as you know, zika has wreaked havoc across south america and it poses a great threat to our country, especially to my home state of florida. there have already been more than 80 zika cases reported in florida and as summer approaches, the situation will likely worsen. we can't wait

mr. cooper. mr. cooper votes aye. mr. turner. mr. turner votes no. ms. bordio. ms. bordio votes aye. mr. klein. mr. klein votes no. mr. courtney. mr. courtney votes no. mr. rogers. mr. rogers? ms. songas. aye. mr. franks. mr. franks votes no. mr. maur amend. votes no. mr. schuster. mr. schuster. mr. johnson. mr. johnson votes no. mr. conway. mr. conway votes mow. ms. spear. ms. spear votes aye. mr. lamborn. mr. b no. mr. castro. mr. castro votes aye. mr. whitman. mr. whitman votes no. ms. duckworth. ms. duckworth votes aye. mr. hunter. mr. hunter? mr. peters. mr. peters votes aye. d dr. fleming, no. mr. visi. votes no. mr. kaufman, mr. kaufman votes no. ms. gabbart. ms. gabbart votes aye. mr. gibson. mr. gibson votes no. mr. walls. mr. walls votes no. ms. hartzler. ms. hartzler votes no. mr. o'rourke. mr. o'rourke votes aye. dr. heck. dr. heck votes no. mr. norcross. mr. norcross votes aye. mr. scott. mr. scott votes no. mr. gieggo. aye. mr. brooks. mr. brooks votes no. mr. takei. mr. takei votes aye. mr. nugent. mr. nugent votes no. ms. graham. ms. graham votes no. mr. cook. mr. coo

mr. cooper -- anderson cooper that is. and they're serving up a springtime spaghetti that's so good, it's newsworthy. plus, we've got an exclusive first look at michael's brand-new barbecue paradise, mabel's. >> these ribs are lip-smacking. >> announcer: the fun starts right now here on "the chew." [ cheers and applause ] >> hey, everybody. welcome to "the chew." thanks, guys. >> whoo!

mr. cooper is a tough political operative. maintaining the domain name.sident of the united states that is part of this investigation as well. deeper and deeper. stuart: nothing ever happens. >> yet. this investigation is not over yet, mr. varney. >> nikki haley testifying on capitol hill. the possible transfer of gitmo detainees. here she is just a few minutes ago. listen to this. >> i think that all the governors know what this means. put it in north carolina. put it in kansas. this is not my backyard. this is the united states of america. and area that we're trying to keep safe and bring terrorists from a place where they cannot harm anyone to an area that has populations within their states that they can't harm. topher bid one ever happened. one. none of that wants that on us. none of us. we cannot afford that. and for what? why are we having this conversation? what is the urgency to move these detainees? i have yet to hear a logical explanation. >> governor haley is not wrong about this. she is right about this. she also is not a loan. whether the pr

mr. cooper. those in favor say aye. as of close say no. the no's have it, the no's have it and the amendment is not agreed to. the gentleman from washington mr. larson. >> thank you mr. chairman. amendment at the desk, 230. >> staff would distribute the amendment. [inaudible conversations] without objection the amendments considered read in the gentleman from washington is recognized for five minutes. >> mr. chairman i think we can move quickly on this. amendment 230 would simply add the new text to the section on ground-based strategic deterrent the incremental cost associated with missile designs which include the flexibility to develop mobile variants as well as the strategic doctrine which will inform an eventual decision on whether to include mobility requirements and future procurement. that is the language that is added to this thing gets to the issue of mobility as part of the version of gps d and i believe, i believe we have an agreement that we can move forward with this language in the committee and would ask for the support of t

mr. cooper, why don't you take it first? why are you bullish oil? >> sure.nless everybody just quits driving cars, we're going to have global command growth. u.s. production is down from last june's peak to 8.9 million barrels. it's fallen 13 of the last 14 weeks. the price is having an impact. unless we see global growth go to nothing, eventually we tighten up. it might be a year or two down the road. >> stuart, what's your thought? >> i'm bearish near term on crude prices. storage levels are too high. the last time we saw crude in this 35 to $40 range was early 2009 aerj storage right now is about 40% higher. i think there has to be a stronger blood letting of production to support these kinds of prices. i'm afraid that a lot of companies are going to kind of dip their toes back into production once we have prices in the 40s. the last time we were here was about a year ago. and they did the same thing. crude went up to $60 and back down to 30. >> what went right for exxon and wrong for chevron and which of the two do you like better? >> i don't look at any

mr. anderson cooper. they're right next door in "the situation room." >> happening now -- a battle of the front runners. hillary clinton and donald trump each looking for a sweep in the northeast. will they run away with victories in all five states? >> forging ahead, one eye on today's votes and other on primaries to come, cruz, kasich, sanders plan, strategize, try to bend the math in their favor. >>> pulse of the electorate. first exit polling starting to come in. in just a few moments, we'll show you data and what it could tell us about what the voters are thinking. >> i'm anderson cooper. >> i'm wolf blitzer. you're in "the situation room." >>> voting is under way right now in pennsylvania, connecticut, maryland, delaware, and rhode island. welcome to super tuesday number 4, a showdown in five northeastern states. reports at polling stations. we also have exit polling data coming into "the situation room" in a few moments. hillary clinton and donald trump, they're hoping today's contests bring them o

mr. anderson cooper. next door in "the situation room." >> happening now -- a battle of the front runners. hillary clinton and donald trump each looking for a sweep in the northeast. will they run away with victories in all five states? >> forging ahead, one eye on today's votes and other on primaries to come, cruz, kasich, sanders plan, strategize, try to bend the math in their favor. >>> pulse of the electorate. first exit polling starting to come in. in just a few moments, we'll show you data and what it could tell us about what the voters are thinking. >> i'm anderson cooper. >> i'm wolf blitzer. you're in "the situation room."

mr. anderson cooper starts right now. >>> good evening. we begin tonight with breaking news.ic candidates have reached an agreement on another cnn debate. it's going to take place in new york city on the 14th. just five days before the primary in new york. wolf blitzer will be moderating. it is a fitting capper to a very full day in the run-up to tomorrow's primary. donald trump telling john kasich, hit the road jack, get out of the race, asking supporters to tell him seal the nomination. governor kasich, who is on the program tonight, calling ted cruz, senator smear, telling him and trump to get over it and put aside the personal attacks and prepare for a contested convention in cleveland. senator cruz with a late-night rally in walk ka shaw wisconsin saying there will only be two candidates left by

mr. cooper, this idea that there is some kind of tort mechanism that's going to help people, uber drooimps don't have any -- you know, they may have minimal insurance that doesn't cover anything, so you can get a liability award maybe, but you can never get compensated under that program. >> thank you. how about some closing remarks from each of us in terms of the short-sightedness, how short-sighted are we being, the discrimination tax, is it enough, or should we look at playing the game differently, new rules and not just allowing the shared economy to get by with such a tax? >> as we've seen the sharing economy grow in recent years we certainly see the good and the bad. i think it's incumbent on all of us to work to make the sharing economy work better for all of us, to make it a situation where it's creating good jobs rather than piecemeal jobs. i think it's one of those things where we want to welcome that innovation but make sure there is a level playing field. there's so much opportunity here and let's grasp it and make sure that there's a strong regulatory environment that protects

mr. anderson cooper starts right now. >>> good evening. we begin tonight with breaking news. this network and the two democratic candidates have reached an agreement on another cnn debate. it's going to take place in new york city on the 14th. just five days before the primary in new york. wolf blitzer will be moderating. it is a fitting capper to a very full day in the run-up to tomorrow's primary. donald trump telling john kasich, hit the road jack, get out of the race, asking supporters to tell him seal the nomination. governor kasich, who is on the program tonight, calling ted cruz, senator smear, telling him and trump to get over it and put aside the personal attacks and prepare for a contested convention in cleveland. senator cruz with a late-night rally in walk ka shaw wisconsin saying there will only be two candidates left by then, himself and donald trump. donald trump has a late-night event in milwaukee practically next door to a bernie sanders event. he's hoping to nab another victory in wisconsin tomorrow while campaigning hard for an upset in new york where he an

not specifically fingerprints, but cooperation. mr. walberg: so cooperation would include information that is necessary for protecting our citizens, correct? ms. saldana: it could. mr. walberg: it could. maybe that's why this hear something being held today. i hope the information will come out so that families won't be seated in the room again, because there's indication that we have not done what's necessary to protect them. that's my concern. again, it's not the i.c.e. agents, it's the administration that isn't doing what's necessary or at least pushing for the funds, the resources, the systems in place to make sure that we have that capability and that's my concern. that's not a charge. that's a request, help us to do the right thing. but in turn, don't give us the excuse. i yield back. ms. saldana: another part though is the congress, sir. could you help us by -- mr. walberg: i think we have helped you with plenty of things. we've asked questions today about why you haven't used some of those resources. why there hasn't been the pu

mr. defazio, for his statement and for his cooperation on this legislation. i also want to thank chairman shuster. as the gentleman mentioned, the transportation and infrastructure committee is oftentimes an example of how we can put politics aside to work together and do good things for the american people. this legislation is very important to my constituents in south florida, in the florida keys, and really to coastal communities all over the country. so i thank the gentleman for his statement. i thank everyone who had a part in crafting this legislation, and i urge all of my colleagues to support it. i reserve the balance of my time. i'm prepared to close. mr. defazio: well, actually i have one other speaker who is vitally interested and concerned about this legislation, the gentleman from florida, mr. murphy. the speaker pro tempore: mr. murphy is recognized. mr. defazio: i'd yield him such time as he may consume. mr. murphy: i thank the gentleman from florida and oregon for their efforts to protect our environment. as the gentleman from florida and i kn

about whether it is allowed to go forward, whether it goes forward, will it discourage cooperation in the future? mr. clapper: i don't know. i'm reluctant to comment on an ongoing matter of litigation. i really can't and shouldn't say anything about it. the likelihood that we are going to engage and hire contractors to do extraordinary interrogation techniques, i think is slim and none. from that standpoint, maybe not. but, i can't really speak to what the total and final legal implications of that case are. >> a question about syria. as you know, the president announced today that he has approved the deployment of 250 additional special operations troops on the ground in syria. this comes after several years in which the assessment of most of the intelligence community was that the arab opposition forces in syria really had very little capability in terms of organization, military impact, saying power, anything you wanted. has that assessment changed, and is it possible yet to set out any plausible timelines if there capability increases, if pressure on isis continues, for the fall of raqqa. mr. cl

make sure there's a side note or a footnote that says this has been accomplished because of our cooperation. mr president, my friend also talked about the accomplishments of the various committees. my caucus knows how much i believe in the committee system. i think it's very important that committees work well, and we know one committee that's not working well, led by the senior senator from iowa. the senior senator from iowa says he feels no pressure of blocking president obama's supreme court nominee merrick garland. if that's really true, senator grassley must not read the papers from iowa. to date there have been two dozen iowa editorials condemning senator grassley's refusal to consider the president's supreme court nominee, and many more letters to the editor. this is only in iowa. around the country, there have been scores and scores of editorials talking about how wrong it is that the judiciary committee is taking a vacation. but in iowa, there was a column published in the "des moines register" over the weekend that was especially discerning. it was offered by veteran iowa political jo

mr. cartoon trump, how do you respond to anderson cooper comparing you to a 5-year-old?derson cooper is a dumb-dumb. he's a stupid head, a total poopy pants. >> you're running for president of the united states. >> excuse me. i didn't start it. >> with all due respect that's the argument of a 5-year-old. >> i didn't start it. >> the argument of a -- >> you would say that that's the problem with our country. >> every parent knows a kid who says he started it. >> then he gave anderson a wedg wedgie. >> lewandowski was charged with simple battery for allegedly grabbing the arm of a reporter. >> he was grabbing me. and just so you understand she was off base because she went through the secret service. she had a pen in her hand which secret service is not liking because they don't know what it is, whether it is a little bomb. >> maybe but she started it. >> how did she start? >> she was holding one of those little bombs. >> a bomb, you mean like one of these. >> aaagh, get it away, steve. >> tomorrow is april fools' day. which means everyone will be waiting for donald trump

cooperation. can nato assure them stability and security in the region with respect to iran? the other question is how much can you give nato in projecting stability in the region? mr. stoltenberg: well, as i said, i very much believe we can expand cooperation with the gulf cooperation council. this is the united arab him it -- i visited the united arab emirate a couple of weeks ago. i think by helping countries in the region to stabilize the region, we are also making the country's more secure. the whole idea is if nato task force is more stable, they are more secure and we are more secure. security is not something you get less of if you share it. you get more security if you create security together. so i strongly believe in us working together with the gcc, and i also believe that the gcc countries can help us, working jointly, for instance, with fighting isil, with building capacity in a country like iraq. for me, we have to do many things at the same time, and we have agreed that we will start to step up and, hopefully, we will be able to make decisions related to this in warsaw. karen: yes, lady in the back in red. >> i'm from the polish embassy. i wanted to

mr. president. if the president consult and cooperate with the senate or moderates his selection's absence consultation, then the nominee may enjoy my support as did justices kennedy and souter. but if he does not, as is the president right, then i will opposes teacher nominee as is my right -- his future nominee as is my right. the evaluation process begins, mr. president. here there is a dramatic change from the bork nomination in 1987 to the thomas nomination in 1991. let observation. , the eventst surrounding the nomination of judge bork have been so misrem embered that observers have completely overlooked one great reacher of these events. -- feature of these events. that is, in most respects, this for howxcellent model the contemporary nomination and confirmation process is debated and should be concluded and but conducted. shortly after he was debated, after observing his records, writings, and speeches, i announced my decision and several other members of the committee did the same. educational.was i laid out the bases for my position in two major national speeches, and other senators did likew

the prostitute has been cooperative in handing over gooey. that's the sex gratuity primate. mr. has been arrested for driving under the influence of methamphetamine. so avoid confusing etiquette problems like this by tipping your prostitute with bit coins. topic number two. governor and a half chris christie is a well-known bruce springsteen fan an turned out to the concert this weekend with some killer dance moves. there he is. oh, yeah, pull those pants up high. there he is miemg what he would like to do where ted cruz if he could get a grip on his lapels. there he is mouthing a few words. just singing along. no longer transfixed by donald trump's head. here is a close-up of chris christie at a concert from last year. it's so sexy. i hope someone gave him a primate as a tip. dear governor, here is gooey. topic number three. it takes time and discipline to train your dog. and it takes even more time and discipline to train your toddler. watch this. >> you want to feed him. sit, stay. stay. stay. kennedy: 472 that dogs are superior to cats. dogs have incredible self sh control.

mr. president. if the president can cooperate with the senate or moderate his selections absent consultation, can his nominees -- then his nominees can enjoy my support. if he does not, as is the president's right, then i will oppose the future nominees as is my right. made themination is evaluation process begins. here there has been a dramatic change from the bork nomination in 1997 to the thomas nomination in 1991. let me state this observation. in retrospect the actual events surrounding the nomination of judge bork have been so misremembered that observers have completely overlooked one great feature of these events. that is in most respects the bork nomination served as an excellent model for how can the contemporary nomination and confirmation process and debate should be concluded and conducted. shortly after judge bork was nominated, after studying his writings and speeches, i announced my opposition to his confirmation. several other members of the committee did the same. what ensued was an educational and enlightening summer. i laid out the basis for my position in two major national speec

cooperation. can nato assure them stability and security in the region with respect to iran? the other question is how much can you give nato in projecting stability in the region? mr. stoltenberg: well, as i said, i very much believe we can expand cooperation with the gulf cooperation council. this is the united arab him itih fighting isil, with building capacity in a country like iraq. for me, we have to do many things at the same time, and we have agreed that we will start to step up and, hopefully, we will be able to make decisions related to this in warsaw. karen: yes, lady in the back in red. >> i'm from the polish embassy. i wanted to ask a quick question, first regarding political deals with russia. what obligations must be fulfilled for full resumption of nrc work? the second question is as for the realignment of nato efforts to increase the presence on the eastern flank with the american eri initiative. and the last one -- is there an appetite in nato to look in the arctic? mr. stoltenberg: first, the nato-russian council -- it is important to underline the following, and that is after the illegal annexation of crimea in 2014, nato decided to suspend all

mr. president. if the president consults and cooperate or moderates the selections absent the consultation, then his nominees may enjoy my support as the justices kennedy. but if he does not as it is the president right then i will oppose the nominees as it is my right. once the nomination is made, the nomination process begins, mr. president. and here it has been a dramatic change from the nomination in 1987 to the thomas nomination in 1991. let me start with this observation. in retrospect the actual nomination of judge had been so misremembered that the observers completely overlooked one great feature of these events. that is, in most respects, the nomination served as an excellent model for how the contemporary nomination and confirmation process and debate should be concluded and deducted. shortly after he was nominated after studying his records and writings and speeches i announced my opposition to the confirmation and many others did the same. what ensued was an educational summer. i laid out a basis for my position and that the two major national speeches and other senators did likewise. t

mr. president. if the president consult and cooperate with the senate or moderates his selection's absence consultation, then the nominee may enjoy my support as did justices kennedy and souter. but if he does not, as is the president's right, then i will oppose his future nominee as is my right. once a nomination is made, the evaluation process begins, mr. president. here there is a dramatic change from the bork nomination in 1987 to the thomas nomination in 1991. let me state -- let me start with this observation. in retrospect, the events surrounding the nomination of judge bork have been so misremembered that observers have completely overlooked one great feature of these events. that is, in most respects, this was an excellent model for how the contemporary nomination and confirmation process is debated -- process in debate should be concluded and conducted. shortly after he was debated, after observing his records, writings, and speeches, i announced my decision and several other members of the committee did the same. what ensued was an educational and enlightening -- i laid out the bases for my

cooperation, they were of a different nature. so i think it is indeed most unfortunate that the russians will not be, that mr. putin or a designate will not be at the nuclear security summit. it's most unfortunate that russia believes it no longer needs to formally cooperate with the united states. but i think if one tries to identify an area in which it still may be possible, despite the chill and the nose dive in u.s.-russian relations, i would say non-proliferation remains one promising area. and to give you just an example, next week, in monterey, we will have various senior u.s. and russian officials joining with experts from both countries to talk about these matters, particularly as they pertain to north korea. and dr. hecker will be one of the participants in that meeting. so i would say that by way of background. if you could indulge me, if i could make just one other set of points, and that has to do with nuclear terrorism and nuclear security. about ten years or so ago, i co-authored a book on the four faces of nuclear terrorism. and as has been alluded to, these different faces of terrorism involve

mr. stoltenberg: well, as i said, i very much believe that we can expand cooperation with the gulf cooperation council. this is the united -- i visited the united arab emirate a couple of weeks ago. i think by helping countries in the region to stabilize the region, we are also making the country's more secure. the whole idea is if nato task force is more stable, they are more secure and we are more secure. security is not something you get less of if you share it. you get more security if you create security together. so i strongly believe in us working together with the gcc, and i also believe that the gcc countries can help us, working jointly, for instance, with fighting isil, with building capacity in a country like iraq. for me, we have to do many things at the same time, and we have agreed that we will start to step up and, hopefully, we will be able to make decisions related to this in warsaw. >> you can watch the rest of this and all of our programming online at www.c-span.org. i am a history buff. seeing the fabric of our country and seeing just how they work and how they are made. >

mr. olsen. my question is very simple. how ought national counterterrorism center coopera cooperate, information sharing with japan, for counterterrorism? >> right. the question is sort of -- how does the -- where i was at the national counterterrorism center, how do we conduct information sharing with japan or that can make it more broadly other countries. so we're -- when i was at the national counterterrorism center, we weren't the main way that information gets shared on counterterrorism that really is largely done by the collection agencies, themselves, cia and nsa and fbi with their kou counterparts. since they were the initial collectors of the information they understood who to share it with, what the rules would apply to the sharing of information. you know, that said, we had -- we had strong relationships with japan and particularly countries in europe and elsewhere in asia on the counterterrorism efforts. so what we were often sharing was analytic products. somethings that we would analyze the information that was collected and we had a rigorous way of sharing that information with other countries including japan. >> but hop

mr. prime minister. you spoke a lot about your value for european integration and cooperation and unification.and i was wondering if you could speak more about european expansion, specifically as it relates to the states coming out of the wars in the former yugoslavia, and a potential independence for catalonia. mr. eisen: when my wife asks me tonight about the meeting with the prime minister, i will say, well, we discussed donald trump and catalonia. [laughter] mr. sobotka: i would like to thank you reciprocity for the introducing debate and question because, for me, it is a great opportunity to formulate some of my ideas. well, the e.u. enlargement is a very ambitious task, and i don't think that the european union resigned on that, especially in view of the western balkans. there's a great number of countries that we're negotiating with about their potential joining of the european union. in my introductory speech, i spoke about the fact that in the 90's, still in the 90's, we saw a lot of bloodshed in the area of the western balkan, and we actually experienced the first migration crisis in

mr. prime minister. you spoke a lot about your value for european integration and cooperation and unification. and i was wondering if you could speak more about european expansion, specifically as it relates to the states coming out of the wars in the former yugoslavia and potential independence for catalonia? >> when they asked, when my wife asks me tonight about the meeting with the prime minister, i'll say, well we discussed donald trump and catalonia. [laughter] >> translator: i would like to interesting debate. because for me it's a opportunity to formulate some of my ideas. well, eu enlargement is a very big task. -- in view of the western balkans that we're negotiating with about their potential joining of the european union and in my introductory speech i spoke about the fact in the '90s. still in the '90s we saw a lot of bloodshed in the area of western balkans and we experienced first migration crisis in reto the refugees from the balkan countries and it is very important to realize western balkans continue to be stablized and stabilization will be achieved only countries like albani

mr. speaker. in my constituency, a family in the small village, despite full cooperation they face an uphill improvement battle with the home office, have their drivers licenses revoked and been forced out of the committee they serve and invested in by technicality. the local shop. will the prime minister look into this grossly unfair situation and work with me to achieve justice for the family? >> i will certainly have a look at the case you mentioned if he lets me know the names and the nature of issues and i will make sure the home office look at it urgently. >> try to as the prime minister window from getting stuck in traffic on thi his which is befe the general election last year, my constituency plagued by high air pollution and also congestion. gibbon discovers commitment to invest billions of pounds in infrastructure, something the previous labour government failed to do, will the prime minister look at committing to look at the construction of the long overdue and much needed missing link road that leads to my constituency? >> i will have a look at what my honorable friend says. he makes an imp

mr. lord nigel lawson, caroline andbairn, norman lamont, maurice levy. lord lamont. trade is actually for mutual cooperation. it is to everybody's advantage. people want trade deals. the idea that it is difficult to negotiate trade deals, i don't entirely accept. i don't accept that it is easier through the eu. if you look at small countries like chile, like singapore, like korea, they've negotiated free-trade agreements far larger than those of the eu. if you had a the gdp of the countries with which switzerland has free-trade agreements, it is larger than the combined gdp of the countries with which the eu has free-trade agreements. the free-trade agreements of many countries outside the eu include to some extent financial services, which the eu free-trade agreements have not been able to do. >> i don't think that is right. if you talk to people negotiating trade deals, because they benefit consumers but damage producers in the short run, they take a long time. nowhere nearl is conclusion. the swiss trade deals took years. deal took seven years. the evidence is that it takes a long time. in theory, they a

cooperation, they were of a different nature. so, i think it is indeed most unfortunate that the russians will not be -- mr. putten or a designate will not be at the nuclear summit. it's most unfortunate that russia believe that is it no longer needs to formally cooperate with the united states. but i think if one tries to identify an area in which it still may be possible despite the chill and the nosedive in u.s./russian relations i would say nonproliferation remains one promising area and to give you just an example, next week in monterey we will have very senior u.s. and russian officials joining with experts from both countries to talk about these matters, particularly as it pertain to north korea and dr. hecker will be one of the participants in that meeting. so i would say that by way of background. if you could indulge me, if i can make just one other set of points and that has to do with nuclear terrorism and nuclear security. about ten years or so ago i co-authored a book on the four faces of nuclear terrorism. and as has been kind of alluded to, these different facets or faces of terrorism involve

mr. cartoon trump, how do you respond to anderson cooper comparing you to a 5-year-old? >> anderson cooper is a dumb-dumb! >> you sound like an idiot. >> stephen, i have a lawyer and i will sue! >> she knows i love her when she wears yellow so she wears it whenever i have a chance. >> my job to make my man happy. >> that's right. >> retiring nba star kobe bryant the stands. the fan was so excited and decided to take a sniff. i hope it smells good! >> fourth time in history a team ranked tenths or lower has reached the final four. if the orange can't do it, i know chris is not happy in the control room. >> you're about to get yanked off the set! >> i know. i won't be back tomorrow. >> is there anything pete rose can do to lead to his reinstatement? >> i think he has a pretty good idea what he has to do. >> we didn't hear. what did he say? >> one of the things is his inability to stay away from betting on baseball. >> so no sunscreen and this equals that? >> yes, this is what we're saying. >> that is bad! wow! >> they said you're putting that on tv? right, i am. going to k

mr. trump wins, will he get the cooperation from the senate, the house, and everybody he needs cooperationm, plus the people he has verbally abused in public, to get some of the things accomplished that he says he would get accomplished? i look at it like this -- a president of the united states has a hard time getting things done, and he is not even half as abrasive as mr. trump, and they said he was going to be a one-term president. plus, if donald trump does not get elected, he does not have to go to washington and deal with all those people that he verbally abused and he will go back to being donald trump. my main question, will he get the cooperation that he really needs to get things done like he says he would get to make america great? thank you. host: jonathan swan, your thoughts? winning, victory, has its own effect. we have already seen -- if anyone ever said to me that the sitting governor of new jersey, chris christie, who, two years ago, was the establishment's great hope within be onstage endorsing donald trump, i would say you are crazy. of course, that happened. if donald t